ROE - ETF AI Analysis
Top Page
Astoria US Quality Kings ETF (ROE)
Rating:73Outperform
Price Target:―
Positive Factors
Solid Year-To-Date Performance
The ETF has delivered strong gains so far this year, showing that its overall strategy has worked well in the current market.
Broad Sector Diversification
Holdings spread across technology, financials, communication services, consumer sectors, health care, and more help reduce the impact of weakness in any single industry.
Healthy Asset Size
With a sizable pool of assets under management, the fund appears established and liquid enough for everyday investors to trade without much difficulty.
Negative Factors
Mixed Performance Among Top Holdings
Several of the largest positions, including well-known technology and media names, have shown weak or lagging returns this year, which can drag on future results.
Higher-Than-Average Expense Ratio
The fund’s fee is on the higher side for an ETF, meaning more of the gross return is eaten up by costs over time.
Heavy U.S. Market Concentration
With almost all assets in U.S. companies, investors are highly exposed to the U.S. economy and have limited diversification across global markets.
ROE vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)
AUM285.75M
RegionNorth America
Expense Ratio0.49%
Beta0.95
IssuerAstoria
Inception DateAug 01, 2023
Dividend Yield0.98%
Asset ClassEquity
Index TrackedNo Underlying Index
Share Statistics
EPS (TTM)N/A
Shares OutstandingN/A
10 Day Avg. Volume21,012
30 Day Avg. Volume24,388
Financial Highlights & Ratios
PEG RatioN/A
Price to Book (P/B)N/A
Price to Sales (P/S)N/A
P/FCF RatioN/A
Enterprise Value/Market CapN/A
Enterprise Value/RevenueN/A
Enterprise Value/Gross ProfitN/A
Enterprise Value/EbitdaN/A
Forecast
1Y Price Target
51.60Price Target Upside― Downside
Rating ConsensusModerate Buy
Number of Analyst Covering101
EPS Forecast (FY)N/A
Revenue Forecast (FY)N/A
ROE Summary
Astoria US Quality Kings ETF (ROE) is a U.S. stock fund that focuses on “quality” companies across the total U.S. market, rather than tracking a specific index. It looks for businesses with strong finances and steady earnings in many sectors, especially technology, financials, and communication services. Well-known holdings include Apple and Microsoft. Investors might consider this ETF for long-term growth and diversification, since it spreads money across many leading U.S. companies. A key risk is that it leans heavily toward U.S. stocks and tech-related names, so its price can rise and fall sharply with the overall stock market and technology sector.
How much will it cost me?The Astoria US Quality Kings ETF (Ticker: ROE) has an expense ratio of 0.49%, meaning you’ll pay $4.90 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is slightly higher than the average for passively managed ETFs because it focuses on a niche strategy of selecting high-quality U.S. companies, which requires more active decision-making. It’s designed for investors seeking a balance of stability and growth.
What would affect this ETF?The Astoria US Quality Kings ETF, with significant exposure to technology and financial sectors, could benefit from continued innovation and strong corporate earnings in these areas, especially if economic conditions remain favorable for growth. However, rising interest rates or regulatory changes affecting key sectors like technology and healthcare could pose challenges, potentially impacting the performance of its top holdings such as Micron and Eli Lilly. Its focus on high-quality U.S. companies provides stability, but broader economic downturns or geopolitical tensions could negatively affect its overall returns.
ROE Top 10 Holdings
ROE is leaning into U.S. tech and AI powerhouses, with Microsoft, Arista Networks, NetApp, and Palantir doing much of the heavy lifting as their cloud and AI stories keep rising. Adobe, however, has been more mixed and is losing some steam, tempering the tech tailwind. Outside of tech, health care names like Halozyme and Tenet Healthcare are quietly adding steady strength, while Newmont and APA give the fund a cyclical boost from materials and energy. Overall, it’s a U.S.-centric, quality-tilted portfolio with a clear tech and innovation backbone.
Name | Company Name | Weight % | Market Value | Market Cap | Yearly Gain | Overall Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Palantir Technologies | 1.64% | $4.69M | $418.93B | 13.86% | 74 Outperform | |
| Halozyme | 1.49% | $4.25M | $12.51B | 47.06% | 73 Outperform | |
| Adobe | 1.41% | $4.03M | $105.94B | -23.63% | 80 Outperform | |
| Microsoft | 1.39% | $3.98M | $3.71T | 0.95% | 79 Outperform | |
| Tenet Healthcare | 1.38% | $3.95M | $21.34B | 35.10% | 74 Outperform | |
| Fox | 1.34% | $3.83M | $25.96B | 6.37% | 77 Outperform | |
| Newmont Mining | 1.33% | $3.80M | $134.97B | 68.16% | 81 Outperform | |
| APA | 1.29% | $3.68M | $14.98B | 88.00% | 73 Outperform | |
| Dell Technologies | 1.21% | $3.45M | $339.79B | 319.88% | 65 Neutral | |
| Ameriprise Financial | 1.19% | $3.39M | $49.52B | 14.57% | 64 Neutral |
ROE Technical Analysis
Positive
―
Price Trends
42.84
Positive
41.64
Positive
38.82
Positive
Market Momentum
0.15
Positive
53.24
Neutral
47.33
Neutral
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For ROE, the sentiment is Positive. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 43.71, equal to the 50-day MA of 42.84, and equal to the 200-day MA of 38.82, indicating a neutral trend. The MACD of 0.15 indicates Positive momentum. The RSI at 53.24 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 47.33 is Neutral, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Positive sentiment for ROE.
ROE Peer Comparison
Comparison Results
Performance Comparison
ROE
Astoria US Quality Kings ETF
43.52
10.23
30.73%
VFMF
Vanguard U.S. Multifactor ETF
―
―
―
BGDV
Bahl & Gaynor Dividend ETF
―
―
―
AVTM
Avantis Total Equity Markets ETF
―
―
―
ULTY
YieldMax Ultra Option Income Strategy ETF
―
―
―
SMRI
Bushido Capital US Equity ETF
―
―
―
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
DisclaimerThis AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents