RNTY - ETF AI Analysis
Top Page
YieldMax Target 12 Real Estate Option Income ETF (RNTY)
Rating:69Neutral
Price Target:―
Positive Factors
Strong Top Holdings
Many of the largest positions in the portfolio have shown strong gains this year, helping support the ETF’s overall results.
Focused Real Estate Exposure
The fund’s heavy tilt toward real estate gives investors targeted access to a range of property-related companies, including data centers, storage, and commercial landlords.
Option Income Strategy Potential
As an option income ETF, it is designed to generate additional cash flow from options, which can be attractive for investors seeking income from their investments.
Negative Factors
High Expense Ratio
The fund’s relatively high fee means more of the returns go toward costs, which can weigh on long-term performance compared with lower-cost alternatives.
Sector Concentration Risk
With almost all assets in real estate and a small slice in energy, the ETF is heavily exposed to downturns in just a few parts of the market.
Short-Term Performance Weakness
Recent one- and three-month returns have been weak, which may signal near-term volatility or pressure on the strategy.
RNTY vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)
AUM5.76M
RegionNorth America
Expense Ratio0.99%
Beta0.31
IssuerYieldMax
Inception DateApr 16, 2025
Dividend Yield13.06%
Asset ClassEquity
Index TrackedNo Underlying Index
Share Statistics
EPS (TTM)N/A
Shares OutstandingN/A
10 Day Avg. Volume2,217
30 Day Avg. Volume2,632
Financial Highlights & Ratios
PEG RatioN/A
Price to Book (P/B)N/A
Price to Sales (P/S)N/A
P/FCF RatioN/A
Enterprise Value/Market CapN/A
Enterprise Value/RevenueN/A
Enterprise Value/Gross ProfitN/A
Enterprise Value/EbitdaN/A
Forecast
1Y Price Target
55.43Price Target Upside― Downside
Rating ConsensusModerate Buy
Number of Analyst Covering26
EPS Forecast (FY)N/A
Revenue Forecast (FY)N/A
RNTY Summary
RNTY, the YieldMax Target 12 Real Estate Option Income ETF, is an actively managed fund focused on U.S. real estate companies. It aims to provide high monthly income by investing in real estate stocks and using options to generate extra cash flow. The fund holds well-known names like Prologis and Simon Property, giving investors exposure to properties such as warehouses, malls, and data centers. Someone might consider RNTY for income and diversification within real estate. However, it can go up and down with the real estate market and its income depends on option strategies that may not always perform as expected.
How much will it cost me?The YieldMax Target 12 Real Estate Option Income ETF (RNTY) has an expense ratio of 0.99%, which means you’ll pay $9.90 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is higher than average because it is actively managed, using a specialized covered call strategy to generate income and target a 12% annual yield. Actively managed funds often have higher costs due to the additional expertise and strategies involved.
What would affect this ETF?RNTY could benefit from a strong U.S. real estate market, driven by economic growth and demand for commercial and residential properties, as well as its covered call strategy, which provides additional income during stable market conditions. However, rising interest rates or economic slowdowns could negatively impact real estate valuations and rental demand, while regulatory changes in the real estate sector might pose challenges to its holdings.
RNTY Top 10 Holdings
RNTY is firmly anchored in U.S. real estate, with a tilt toward modern infrastructure like data centers and logistics. Equinix, Iron Mountain, and Digital Realty have been the main engines, rising on strong growth narratives tied to digital and storage demand. Welltower and Simon Property are steadier contributors, helping balance the ride with more traditional real estate exposure. On the flip side, Vivmark Residential and Realty Income have been lagging, acting as a bit of a weight on returns. Overall, the fund is concentrated in U.S. REITs, with performance driven by the tech-leaning side of real estate.
Name | Company Name | Weight % | Market Value | Market Cap | Yearly Gain | Overall Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Welltower | 6.69% | $388.48K | $165.94B | 31.19% | 77 Outperform | |
| Prologis | 6.56% | $380.72K | $125.85B | 11.82% | 76 Outperform | |
| Vivmark Residential | 6.28% | $364.48K | $47.01B | -5.21% | 70 Outperform | |
| Digital Realty | 5.77% | $334.58K | $65.12B | 2.38% | 69 Neutral | |
| Simon Property | 5.23% | $303.76K | $64.96B | 8.51% | 70 Outperform | |
| Howard Hughes Holdings | 4.90% | $284.54K | $4.40B | -13.70% | 68 Neutral | |
| Equinix | 4.85% | $281.23K | $99.81B | 30.70% | 73 Outperform | |
| St Joe Company | 4.53% | $262.92K | $3.74B | 32.67% | 78 Outperform | |
| Realty Income | 4.21% | $244.16K | $51.38B | -10.90% | 70 Outperform | |
| Iron Mountain | 3.94% | $228.35K | $33.03B | 8.50% | 55 Neutral |
RNTY Technical Analysis
Negative
―
Price Trends
48.23
Negative
48.39
Negative
47.55
Negative
Market Momentum
-0.60
Positive
28.03
Positive
17.15
Positive
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For RNTY, the sentiment is Negative. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 47.03, equal to the 50-day MA of 48.23, and equal to the 200-day MA of 47.55, indicating a bearish trend. The MACD of -0.60 indicates Positive momentum. The RSI at 28.03 is Positive, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 17.15 is Positive, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Negative sentiment for RNTY.
RNTY Peer Comparison
Comparison Results
Performance Comparison
RNTY
YieldMax Target 12 Real Estate Option Income ETF
45.95
1.09
2.43%
PSR
Invesco Active U.S. Real Estate Fund
―
―
―
REIT
ALPS Active REIT ETF
―
―
―
SRHR
SRH REIT Covered Call ETF
―
―
―
BYRE
Principal Real Estate Active Opportunities ETF
―
―
―
TRUR
VanEck Real Estate TruSector ETF
―
―
―
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
DisclaimerThis AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents