tiprankstipranks
Advertisement

QFHD - ETF AI Analysis

Compare

Top Page

QFHD

Pacer S&P 500 Quality FCF High Dividend ETF (QFHD)

Rating:70Outperform
Price Target:
QFHD, the Pacer S&P 500 Quality FCF High Dividend ETF, has a solid overall rating driven mainly by financially strong, income-focused holdings like Prudential Financial and T. Rowe Price, which combine healthy cash flows, reasonable valuations, and supportive dividend profiles. Additional support comes from names like Pfizer and UPS, which offer solid fundamentals and dividends but face some growth and strategic uncertainties, while weaker momentum and leverage concerns in holdings such as Best Buy and Kimberly-Clark slightly weigh on the fund’s overall appeal. The main risk factor is that many holdings share challenges like sluggish revenue growth, cost pressures, or technical weakness, which could limit upside in tougher market conditions.
Positive Factors
Solid Recent Performance
The ETF has delivered steady gains so far this year and over the past few months, showing resilient performance in the current market.
Diversified Across Many Sectors
Holdings are spread across financials, consumer defensive, utilities, technology, industrials, health care, energy, and other sectors, which helps reduce the impact of weakness in any single industry.
Several Strong Top Holdings
Some of the largest positions, such as LyondellBasell, Pfizer, and Altria, have shown strong or positive performance, helping support the fund’s overall returns.
Negative Factors
Higher Expense Ratio
The fund’s fee is on the higher side for an ETF, which can gradually eat into investor returns over time.
Heavy U.S.-Only Exposure
With almost all assets invested in U.S. companies, the ETF offers little geographic diversification and is highly tied to the U.S. market.
Notable Lagging Holdings
Several top positions, including Campbell Soup, General Mills, Prudential Financial, Best Buy, and T. Rowe Price, have shown weak or negative performance, which can drag on the fund’s results.

QFHD vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)

QFHD Summary

QFHD is the Pacer S&P 500 Quality FCF High Dividend ETF. It follows the S&P 500 Quality FCF High Dividend Index, which picks 100 large U.S. companies from the S&P 500 that pay relatively high dividends and generate strong cash flow. Well-known holdings include United Parcel Service (UPS) and Pfizer. Investors might consider this ETF if they want dividend income plus broad diversification across many sectors, rather than betting on just a few stocks. A key risk is that stock prices and dividend payments can go up and down with the overall market, so your investment value is not guaranteed.
How much will it cost me?This ETF has an expense ratio of 0.49%, which means you’ll pay about $4.90 per year for every $1,000 you invest. That’s higher than the cost of a typical low-cost index ETF because this fund uses a more specialized, rules-based strategy to focus on high-dividend, high-quality companies rather than simply tracking the broad market.
What would affect this ETF?This U.S. large‑cap dividend ETF could benefit if interest rates fall or stabilize, since steady or cheaper borrowing costs and a solid economy tend to support cash‑rich, dividend‑paying companies in sectors like consumer defensive, utilities, and health care, and can help holdings such as Campbell Soup, Pfizer, and General Mills keep paying and growing dividends. On the other hand, a weak U.S. economy, rising rates that make bonds more attractive than dividends, pressure on consumer spending that hurts retailers like Best Buy and shippers like UPS, or new regulations affecting high‑dividend industries such as energy and financials could weigh on the fund’s performance.

QFHD Top 10 Holdings

QFHD leans heavily on steady, cash-rich U.S. names, with consumer defensives and financials setting the tone. Best Buy and UPS have been quietly rising, helping pull the fund forward, while T. Rowe Price has been a bright spot with stronger recent momentum. On the flip side, Campbell Soup and General Mills have been losing steam, acting as a brake on returns, and Pfizer’s performance has been more mixed. Overall, this is a U.S.-only, dividend-focused portfolio, with no single stock dominating but a clear tilt toward mature, income-generating businesses.
Name
Company Name
Weight %
Market Value
Market Cap
Yearly Gain
Overall Rating
United Parcel2.42%$13.06K$94.06B7.46%
72
Outperform
T Rowe Price2.39%$12.92K$25.40B20.47%
75
Outperform
Best Buy Co2.38%$12.87K$16.44B8.97%
62
Neutral
Prudential Financial2.24%$12.09K$39.19B7.36%
77
Outperform
Altria Group1.98%$10.69K$121.42B22.54%
64
Neutral
General Mills1.87%$10.11K$20.05B-28.43%
66
Neutral
Skyworks Solutions1.85%$10.01K$9.41B-18.74%
70
Outperform
Pfizer1.85%$10.00K$138.61B-6.05%
74
Outperform
Kimberly Clark1.81%$9.75K$38.08B-12.68%
63
Neutral
Paychex1.79%$9.68K$37.82B-27.27%
77
Outperform

QFHD Technical Analysis

Technical Analysis Sentiment
Positive
Last Price
Price Trends
50DMA
26.22
Positive
100DMA
26.13
Positive
200DMA
Market Momentum
MACD
0.19
Negative
RSI
55.33
Neutral
STOCH
75.99
Neutral
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For QFHD, the sentiment is Positive. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 26.57, equal to the 50-day MA of 26.22, and equal to the 200-day MA of ―, indicating a neutral trend. The MACD of 0.19 indicates Negative momentum. The RSI at 55.33 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 75.99 is Neutral, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Positive sentiment for QFHD.

QFHD Peer Comparison

Comparison Results
Name
Price
Price Target
AUM
Expense Ratio
Overall Rating
$537.92K0.49%
70
Outperform
$97.16M0.45%
69
Neutral
$96.55M0.80%
67
Neutral
$93.97M0.35%
73
Outperform
$92.27M0.93%
63
Neutral
$88.28M0.49%
71
Outperform
Performance Comparison
Ticker
Company Name
Price
Change
% Change
QFHD
Pacer S&P 500 Quality FCF High Dividend ETF
26.74
1.80
7.22%
ACEP
ARS Core Equity Portfolio ETF
FCUS
Pinnacle Focused Opportunities ETF
JOYT
JPMorgan Equity and Options Total Return ETF
EGGQ
NestYield Visionary ETF
JHDG
John Hancock Hedged Equity ETF
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
DisclaimerThis AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents
Advertisement