tiprankstipranks
Advertisement

PWER - ETF AI Analysis

Compare

Top Page

PWER

Macquarie Energy Transition ETF (PWER)

Rating:65Neutral
Price Target:
PWER, the Macquarie Energy Transition ETF, earns a solid overall rating largely because several of its key holdings like ConocoPhillips, EOG Resources, Steel Dynamics, and Ero Copper show strong financial performance, positive earnings call sentiment, and supportive technical trends, which together provide a stable foundation for the fund. Some holdings such as Valero Energy, HF Sinclair, Teck Resources, and First Solar face issues like valuation concerns, cash flow challenges, and operational pressures, which modestly weigh on the rating. The main risk factor is the fund’s concentration in energy and transition-related industries, which can make performance more sensitive to commodity prices, sector cycles, and policy changes.
Positive Factors
Strong Year-to-Date Performance
The fund has delivered strong gains so far this year, showing that its strategy has recently worked well for investors.
Leading Holdings with Strong Momentum
Several of the largest positions, especially in energy and materials companies, have shown strong performance, helping drive the ETF’s overall returns.
Focused Exposure to Energy Transition Theme
The ETF concentrates on materials and energy sectors tied to the energy transition, giving investors targeted exposure to this specific long-term trend.
Negative Factors
High Sector Concentration
Heavy weights in materials and energy mean the fund is less diversified and more vulnerable if these sectors face a downturn.
Mixed Performance Among Top Holdings
A few key positions, including some in renewable-related names, have shown weak or negative performance, which can offset gains from stronger holdings.
High Expense Ratio
The fund charges a relatively high fee, which can eat into investor returns over time compared with lower-cost ETFs.

PWER vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)

PWER Summary

The Macquarie Energy Transition ETF (PWER) is a fund that focuses on companies helping move the world toward cleaner energy, rather than tracking a traditional stock index. It invests in businesses tied to renewable power, cleaner fuels, and materials needed for the energy transition. Well-known holdings include Valero Energy and Shell, along with First Solar, a major solar company. Someone might invest in PWER to tap into long-term growth from the shift to a low-carbon economy while spreading money across many related companies. A key risk is that it’s heavily focused on energy and materials, so its price can swing a lot with changes in those markets.
How much will it cost me?The Macquarie Energy Transition ETF (Ticker: PWER) has an expense ratio of 0.8%, meaning you’ll pay $8 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is higher than average because the fund is actively managed, focusing on a specialized niche in the low-carbon energy transition sector, which requires more research and management effort.
What would affect this ETF?The Macquarie Energy Transition ETF (PWER) could benefit from global efforts to combat climate change and increasing investments in renewable energy, clean technology, and sustainable infrastructure, as governments and corporations prioritize decarbonization. However, potential risks include fluctuating commodity prices in the materials and energy sectors, regulatory changes, and economic slowdowns that could impact funding for green initiatives or the adoption of new technologies.

PWER Top 10 Holdings

PWER’s story right now is less about shiny solar panels and more about the gritty backbone of the energy transition. Copper names like Ero Copper and Hudbay are rising and doing much of the heavy lifting, while Teck Resources adds another steady boost from the materials side. On the energy front, Valero and HF Sinclair are powering ahead, with ConocoPhillips and EOG providing solid, if unspectacular, support. First Solar, however, has been losing steam lately, slightly dragging on returns. Overall, it’s a globally focused, materials-and-energy-heavy bet on the transition rather than pure-play renewables.
Name
Company Name
Weight %
Market Value
Market Cap
Yearly Gain
Overall Rating
Ero Copper6.49%$829.22K$4.05B170.78%
76
Outperform
Hudbay Minerals6.27%$800.93K$13.02B144.08%
76
Outperform
Valero Energy5.88%$752.29K$101.45B131.80%
69
Neutral
Steel Dynamics5.84%$746.47K$33.63B79.24%
76
Outperform
HF Sinclair Corporation5.11%$653.10K$17.73B95.97%
68
Neutral
Conocophillips4.49%$574.19K$156.59B31.71%
78
Outperform
Wheaton Precious Metals4.09%$522.86K$69.63B52.69%
EOG Resources3.87%$495.13K$75.19B14.84%
78
Outperform
Shell3.72%$475.82K$249.66B23.05%
78
Outperform
First Solar3.72%$475.37K$21.97B4.75%
75
Outperform

PWER Technical Analysis

Technical Analysis Sentiment
Positive
Last Price
Price Trends
50DMA
42.81
Positive
100DMA
42.96
Positive
200DMA
40.26
Positive
Market Momentum
MACD
0.91
Positive
RSI
63.27
Neutral
STOCH
31.47
Neutral
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For PWER, the sentiment is Positive. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 45.51, equal to the 50-day MA of 42.81, and equal to the 200-day MA of 40.26, indicating a bullish trend. The MACD of 0.91 indicates Positive momentum. The RSI at 63.27 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 31.47 is Neutral, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Positive sentiment for PWER.

PWER Peer Comparison

Comparison Results
Name
Price
Price Target
AUM
Expense Ratio
Overall Rating
$12.72M0.79%
65
Neutral
$99.87M1.00%
69
Neutral
$90.60M0.50%
68
Neutral
$90.36M0.75%
71
Outperform
$82.95M0.90%
62
Neutral
$58.49M0.50%
63
Neutral
Performance Comparison
Ticker
Company Name
Price
Change
% Change
PWER
Macquarie Energy Transition ETF
46.23
15.93
52.57%
FFND
Future Fund Active ETF
IQM
Franklin Intelligent Machines ETF
FITZ
Fitz-Gerald Must Have Portfolio ETF
HECO
SPDR Galaxy Hedged Digital Asset Ecosystem ETF
TEKY
Lazard Next Gen Technologies ETF
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
DisclaimerThis AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents
Advertisement