PWER - ETF AI Analysis
Top Page
Macquarie Energy Transition ETF (PWER)
PWER, the Macquarie Energy Transition ETF, has a solid overall rating driven by strong contributors like EOG Resources and Alcoa, which bring robust financial performance, reasonable valuations, and supportive technical trends to the portfolio. However, holdings such as Generac, with mixed results, bearish momentum, and valuation concerns, slightly weigh on the fund’s quality. The main risk factor is the fund’s concentration in energy transition–related companies, which can make performance more sensitive to sector-specific and commodity market shifts.
PWER vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)
- AUM
- 12.36M
- Region
- Global
- Expense Ratio
- 0.79%
- Beta
- 0.77
- Issuer
- Nomura
- Inception Date
- Nov 28, 2023
- Dividend Yield
- 1.10%
- Asset Class
- Equity
- Index Tracked
- No Underlying Index
PWER Summary
The Macquarie Energy Transition ETF (PWER) is a fund that focuses on companies helping move the world toward cleaner energy, rather than tracking a traditional stock index. It invests in businesses tied to renewable power, cleaner fuels, and materials needed for the energy transition. Well-known holdings include Valero Energy and Shell, along with First Solar, a major solar company. Someone might invest in PWER to tap into long-term growth from the shift to a low-carbon economy while spreading money across many related companies. A key risk is that it’s heavily focused on energy and materials, so its price can swing a lot with changes in those markets.
How much will it cost me?
The Macquarie Energy Transition ETF (Ticker: PWER) has an expense ratio of 0.8%, meaning you’ll pay $8 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is higher than average because the fund is actively managed, focusing on a specialized niche in the low-carbon energy transition sector, which requires more research and management effort.
What would affect this ETF?
The Macquarie Energy Transition ETF (PWER) could benefit from global efforts to combat climate change and increasing investments in renewable energy, clean technology, and sustainable infrastructure, as governments and corporations prioritize decarbonization. However, potential risks include fluctuating commodity prices in the materials and energy sectors, regulatory changes, and economic slowdowns that could impact funding for green initiatives or the adoption of new technologies.
PWER Top 10 Holdings
PWER is a global play on the energy transition, but its story right now is a tug-of-war between old and new energy. Valero Energy and Generac are doing much of the heavy lifting, with rising share prices that help power overall returns. Traditional resource names like EOG Resources and Teck Resources are steady contributors, while Anglo American has been more mixed. On the other side, First Solar and Alcoa are losing steam, dragging on performance. Overall, the fund leans heavily into energy and materials, with a diversified mix across U.S. and international names.
| Name | Company Name | Weight % | Market Value | Market Cap | Yearly Gain | Overall Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EOG Resources | 4.40% | $545.77K | $82.88B | 47.33% | 78Outperform | |
| Teck Resources | ― | ― | ― | ― | 66Neutral | |
| Valero Energy | 3.57% | $442.04K | $128.04B | 184.36% | 69Neutral | |
| HF Sinclair Corporation | 3.55% | $439.64K | $22.27B | 147.46% | 68Neutral | |
| American Electric Power | 3.49% | $432.28K | $69.21B | 8.18% | 69Neutral | |
| First Solar | 3.24% | $401.39K | $18.55B | -27.40% | 75Outperform | |
| Xcel Energy | 3.35% | $415.05K | $47.67B | -5.91% | 61Neutral | |
| Conocophillips | 3.40% | $421.95K | $176.01B | 68.58% | 78Outperform | |
| Shell | 3.35% | $415.33K | $298.89B | 49.45% | 78Outperform | |
| Waste Management | 3.26% | $404.49K | $90.68B | 6.36% | 76Outperform |
PWER Technical Analysis
Price Trends
Market Momentum
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For PWER, the sentiment is Neutral. The current price of 44.50 is above the 20-day moving average (MA) of 44.29, below the 50-day MA of 45.04, and above the 200-day MA of 41.76, indicating a neutral trend. The MACD of -0.03 indicates Negative momentum. The RSI at 49.18 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 15.23 is Positive, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Neutral sentiment for PWER.
PWER Peer Comparison
Comparison Results
| Name | Price | Price Target | AUM | Expense Ratio | Overall Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| $44.50 | $46.00(3.38% Upside) | $12.36M | 0.79% | 63Neutral | |
| $31.73 | $38.94(22.74% Upside) | $96.06M | 0.98% | 69Neutral | |
| $96.90 | $142.27(46.82% Upside) | $80.24M | 0.50% | 69Neutral | |
| $51.11 | $98.16(92.05% Upside) | $69.49M | 0.90% | 63Neutral | |
| $42.59 | $56.34(32.27% Upside) | $57.27M | 0.50% | 63Neutral | |
| $23.64 | $29.54(24.98% Upside) | $54.25M | 0.60% | 62Neutral |
Performance Comparison
| Show on chart | Ticker | Company Name | Price | Change | % Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PWER | Macquarie Energy Transition ETF | 44.50 | 11.52 | 34.91% | |
| FFND | Future Fund Active ETF | 31.73 | 1.91 | 6.41% | |
| IQM | Franklin Intelligent Machines ETF | 96.90 | 7.70 | 8.63% | |
| HECO | SPDR Galaxy Hedged Digital Asset Ecosystem ETF | 51.11 | 5.25 | 11.44% | |
| TEKY | Lazard Next Gen Technologies ETF | 42.59 | 3.51 | 8.98% | |
| KWH | GMO Power Infrastructure ETF | 23.64 | -1.36 | -5.44% |
This AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.