tiprankstipranks
Advertisement

PPH - ETF AI Analysis

Compare

Top Page

PPH

VanEck Pharmaceutical ETF (PPH)

Rating:73Outperform
Price Target:
PPH, the VanEck Pharmaceutical ETF, earns a solid overall rating largely because it is anchored by strong global pharma leaders like Merck, Novartis, Johnson & Johnson, and GSK, which show robust financial performance, positive earnings outlooks, and healthy growth pipelines. Eli Lilly, Pfizer, and Novo Nordisk also support the fund with solid fundamentals, though issues like high leverage, bearish technical signals, and revenue or market-share challenges, along with weaker names such as McKesson and AbbVie facing financial stability and profitability concerns, slightly weigh on the rating. The main risk is the fund’s concentration in a single industry—pharmaceuticals—meaning sector-specific setbacks could impact many holdings at once.
Positive Factors
Strong Recent Performance
The ETF has shown steady gains over the past month, three months, and year to date, indicating solid recent momentum.
Leading Pharmaceutical Holdings
Several of the largest positions, including major drug makers like Eli Lilly, Merck, Bristol-Myers Squibb, AbbVie, and Johnson & Johnson, have delivered strong year-to-date performance that supports the fund’s returns.
Focused Healthcare Exposure
By concentrating on the health care sector, the ETF gives investors targeted exposure to large, established pharmaceutical companies that can benefit from long-term demand for medicines.
Negative Factors
High Stock Concentration
A small number of companies, especially Eli Lilly and a few other large positions, make up a big share of the portfolio, increasing the impact if any of these stocks stumble.
Sector Concentration Risk
Almost all assets are in the health care sector, so the fund could be hit hard if pharmaceutical stocks face regulatory, pricing, or industry-specific challenges.
Mixed Performance Among Top Holdings
Some key positions like Novo Nordisk and Pfizer have shown weak or slightly negative year-to-date performance, which can drag on overall returns if this trend continues.

PPH vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)

PPH Summary

VanEck Pharmaceutical ETF (PPH) is a fund that follows the MVIS US Listed Pharmaceutical 25 Index, focusing on major drug and medicine makers. It holds big, well-known companies like Eli Lilly and Pfizer, along with other global pharmaceutical leaders. Investors might consider PPH if they want simple, one-stop exposure to the healthcare and drug industry, which can benefit from aging populations and rising demand for treatments. However, this ETF is heavily concentrated in pharmaceutical stocks, so its price can swing with changes in drug regulation, patent issues, and overall health care market conditions.
How much will it cost me?The VanEck Pharmaceutical ETF (PPH) has an expense ratio of 0.36%, which means you’ll pay $3.60 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is slightly higher than the average for passively managed ETFs because it focuses on a specialized sector, the pharmaceutical industry, which may require more research and management to track effectively.
What would affect this ETF?The VanEck Pharmaceutical ETF (PPH) could benefit from trends like aging populations, increased healthcare spending, and advancements in medical research, which drive demand for innovative treatments and medications. However, it may face challenges from regulatory changes, patent expirations, or pricing pressures in the pharmaceutical industry, which could impact the profitability of its top holdings like Eli Lilly, Novartis, and Pfizer.

PPH Top 10 Holdings

PPH is essentially a bet on Big Pharma, with Eli Lilly sitting in the driver’s seat: its longer-term gains help power the fund, even though the stock has cooled recently. Merck, Bristol-Myers Squibb, AbbVie, and Johnson & Johnson form a strong supporting cast, all showing rising momentum that keeps the ETF’s health in good shape. Novo Nordisk is more of a mixed story, losing steam this year and acting as a small drag. With all holdings in global drugmakers, the fund is tightly focused on the pharmaceutical world rather than broader health care.
Name
Company Name
Weight %
Market Value
Market Cap
Yearly Gain
Overall Rating
Eli Lilly & Co18.96%$188.38M$1.05T47.70%
72
Outperform
Merck & Company11.10%$110.26M$355.10B73.81%
80
Outperform
Novartis9.33%$92.70M$250.94B10.50%
80
Outperform
Pfizer5.18%$51.47M$157.99B16.13%
74
Outperform
Bristol-Myers Squibb4.95%$49.17M$130.00B37.75%
78
Outperform
Novo Nordisk4.93%$48.99M$189.94B-21.50%
73
Outperform
McKesson4.81%$47.79M$102.78B23.91%
62
Neutral
AbbVie4.64%$46.10M$454.36B17.76%
66
Neutral
Johnson & Johnson4.57%$45.42M$640.02B49.15%
78
Outperform
GlaxoSmithKline4.06%$40.33M$95.90B17.88%
77
Outperform

PPH Technical Analysis

Technical Analysis Sentiment
Positive
Last Price
Price Trends
50DMA
111.64
Negative
100DMA
107.39
Positive
200DMA
105.45
Positive
Market Momentum
MACD
-0.31
Positive
RSI
46.06
Neutral
STOCH
10.09
Positive
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For PPH, the sentiment is Positive. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 113.75, equal to the 50-day MA of 111.64, and equal to the 200-day MA of 105.45, indicating a neutral trend. The MACD of -0.31 indicates Positive momentum. The RSI at 46.06 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 10.09 is Positive, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Positive sentiment for PPH.

PPH Peer Comparison

Comparison Results
Name
Price
Price Target
AUM
Expense Ratio
Overall Rating
$994.73M0.36%
73
Outperform
$992.65M0.39%
59
Neutral
$940.92M0.40%
63
Neutral
$874.80M0.17%
66
Neutral
$458.69M0.35%
72
Outperform
$204.53M0.75%
60
Neutral
Performance Comparison
Ticker
Company Name
Price
Change
% Change
PPH
VanEck Pharmaceutical ETF
109.44
23.02
26.64%
SLVP
iShares MSCI Global Silver Miners ETF
GII
SPDR S&P Global Infrastructure ETF
AVRE
Avantis Real Estate ETF
BBH
VanEck Biotech ETF
CANC
Tema Oncology ETF
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
DisclaimerThis AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents
Advertisement