tiprankstipranks
Advertisement

PALC - ETF AI Analysis

Compare

Top Page

PALC

Pacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF (PALC)

Rating:70Outperform
Price Target:
PALC’s rating suggests it is a solid, but not flawless, large-cap ETF, with much of its strength coming from high-quality financial and tech names like Wells Fargo and Meta, which show strong earnings, positive momentum, and attractive or reasonable valuations. Amazon and Goldman Sachs also support the fund’s quality through strong financial performance and growth initiatives, though issues like premium valuations, overbought or mixed technical signals, and cash flow or debt concerns at several holdings (such as AT&T and some other banks) keep the overall rating from being higher. The main risk is the fund’s heavy tilt toward large financial institutions, which can make performance more sensitive to interest rates, credit conditions, and broader economic stress in the financial sector.
Positive Factors
Strong Year-To-Date Performance
The ETF has delivered solid gains so far this year, showing that its strategy has worked well in the recent market environment.
Leading Technology and Semiconductor Exposure
Several top holdings are well-known technology and chip-related companies that have shown strong performance, helping drive the fund’s returns.
Broad Sector Diversification
The ETF spreads its investments across many sectors, which can help reduce the impact if any single industry experiences a downturn.
Negative Factors
Higher Expense Ratio
The fund’s fees are on the higher side for an ETF, which can slightly reduce the net returns investors receive over time.
Recent Short-Term Weakness
The ETF has slipped over the past month, showing that its performance can be sensitive to short-term market swings.
Heavy U.S. Market Concentration
Almost all of the ETF’s holdings are in U.S. companies, offering little geographic diversification if the U.S. market struggles.

PALC vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)

PALC Summary

The Pacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF (PALC) tracks the Lunt Capital U.S. Large Cap Multi-Factor Rotation Index, focusing on big U.S. companies across many industries, especially technology, industrials, and health care. It holds well-known names like Apple and Costco, giving investors broad exposure to leading U.S. businesses in a single fund. PALC aims for growth by shifting among different styles, such as value and growth, to adapt to changing markets. A key risk is that it is heavily invested in large U.S. stocks, especially tech, so its price can rise or fall sharply with swings in the overall stock market.
How much will it cost me?The Pacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF (PALC) has an expense ratio of 0.6%, which means you’ll pay $6 per year for every $1,000 you invest. This is higher than the average for passively managed ETFs because PALC uses an active multi-factor strategy to adapt to market conditions and optimize returns.
What would affect this ETF?The PALC ETF, with its focus on large-cap U.S. equities and multi-factor strategy, could benefit from economic growth and strong performance in sectors like financials, energy, and technology, which make up a significant portion of its holdings. However, it may face challenges from rising interest rates, regulatory changes impacting financial institutions, or economic slowdowns that affect consumer spending and cyclical sectors. Its adaptability to market conditions through its alternator methodology may help mitigate some risks while capturing opportunities.

PALC Top 10 Holdings

PALC is leaning heavily into big U.S. financials, with Bank of America, JPMorgan, and Goldman Sachs doing much of the heavy lifting as they’ve been steadily rising and benefiting from solid earnings. Citigroup is also contributing, though its momentum looks a bit more measured. On the flip side, Meta has been losing steam lately, acting as a mild drag despite strong fundamentals, while Wells Fargo’s mixed performance hasn’t helped much either. Amazon and AbbVie add a growth and health-care twist, but this is still very much a U.S.-centric, bank-led story.
Name
Company Name
Weight %
Market Value
Market Cap
Yearly Gain
Overall Rating
UnitedHealth4.39%$9.37M$356.47B25.92%
72
Outperform
Netflix3.49%$7.45M$325.83B-37.09%
73
Outperform
Salesforce3.27%$6.97M$213.35B3.38%
80
Outperform
Bank of America2.67%$5.69M$438.31B25.94%
72
Outperform
Berkshire Hathaway B2.43%$5.18M$974.25B1.25%
66
Neutral
AT&T2.37%$5.05M$175.97B-13.21%
71
Outperform
Verizon2.07%$4.42M$208.32B12.98%
81
Outperform
Abbott Laboratories1.98%$4.23M$187.45B-18.51%
73
Outperform
Wells Fargo1.96%$4.18M$272.07B13.94%
80
Outperform
ServiceNow1.95%$4.16M$146.06B-22.71%
75
Outperform

PALC Technical Analysis

Technical Analysis Sentiment
Neutral
Last Price
Price Trends
50DMA
57.18
Positive
100DMA
56.43
Positive
200DMA
54.64
Positive
Market Momentum
MACD
0.24
Positive
RSI
50.36
Neutral
STOCH
36.95
Neutral
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For PALC, the sentiment is Neutral. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 57.92, equal to the 50-day MA of 57.18, and equal to the 200-day MA of 54.64, indicating a neutral trend. The MACD of 0.24 indicates Positive momentum. The RSI at 50.36 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 36.95 is Neutral, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Neutral sentiment for PALC.

PALC Peer Comparison

Comparison Results
Name
Price
Price Target
AUM
Expense Ratio
Overall Rating
$213.23M0.60%
70
Outperform
$996.77M0.19%
72
Outperform
$973.37M0.15%
73
Outperform
$970.28M0.75%
71
Outperform
$906.61M0.25%
71
Outperform
$880.07M0.35%
74
Outperform
Performance Comparison
Ticker
Company Name
Price
Change
% Change
PALC
Pacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF
57.60
7.67
15.36%
IUS
Invesco RAFI Strategic US ETF
CVLC
Calvert US Large-Cap Core Responsible Index ETF
FTQI
First Trust Hedged BuyWrite Income ETF
SPHB
Invesco S&P 500 High Beta ETF
INFO
Harbor PanAgora Dynamic Large Cap Core ETF
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
DisclaimerThis AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents
Advertisement