tiprankstipranks
Advertisement

LVHD - ETF AI Analysis

Compare

Top Page

LVHD

Legg Mason Low Volatility High Dividend ETF (LVHD)

Rating:70Neutral
Price Target:
LVHD, the Legg Mason Low Volatility High Dividend ETF, earns a solid overall rating thanks to stable, cash-generative companies like Verizon, Johnson & Johnson, Coca-Cola, and US Bancorp, which combine strong financial performance with generally supportive earnings commentary and reasonable valuations. These strengths are partly offset by holdings such as Kimberly-Clark, Home Depot, and McDonald’s, where higher leverage, bearish or weak technical trends, and growth or market challenges weigh on the fund. The main risk factor is that many top holdings share issues like high leverage and some bearish technical signals, which could limit upside in tougher market conditions.
Positive Factors
Strong Top Holdings Performance
Most of the largest positions have shown solid gains so far this year, which has helped support the ETF’s overall returns.
Defensive Sector Tilt
Heavy exposure to utilities, consumer defensive, and real estate stocks can make the fund more resilient during market downturns.
Moderate Expense Ratio
The fund’s fee level is reasonable for a specialized strategy, allowing investors to keep more of their returns compared with many actively managed products.
Negative Factors
High U.S. Concentration
With nearly all assets invested in U.S. companies, the ETF offers little geographic diversification and is heavily tied to the U.S. economy.
Sector Concentration Risk
Large weights in a few defensive sectors mean the fund could lag if areas like utilities or real estate fall out of favor.
Some Lagging Holdings
A small number of top positions, such as McDonald’s, have been weak recently, which can slightly drag on overall performance.

LVHD vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)

LVHD Summary

LVHD is an exchange-traded fund that follows the Franklin Low Volatility High Dividend Index, focusing on U.S. companies that pay relatively high dividends and tend to have smaller price swings. It holds well-known names like Coca-Cola and Johnson & Johnson, along with many utilities and consumer defensive stocks that aim to provide steady income. Someone might consider this ETF if they want regular dividend payments and a smoother ride than the overall stock market. A key risk is that it still invests in stocks, so its value can go up and down with the market, and its focus on dividend payers may lag fast-growing sectors.
How much will it cost me?The Legg Mason Low Volatility High Dividend ETF (LVHD) has an expense ratio of 0.27%, which means you’ll pay $2.70 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is slightly higher than average for passively managed ETFs because it uses a strategic approach to select lower-volatility, high-dividend stocks, requiring more active oversight. It’s designed to balance income and stability for investors.
What would affect this ETF?The LVHD ETF, with its focus on high-dividend, low-volatility stocks in sectors like Utilities and Consumer Defensive, could benefit from stable economic conditions and increased demand for income-generating investments, especially during periods of market uncertainty. However, it may face challenges if interest rates rise, as higher yields on bonds could make dividend-focused ETFs less attractive, or if sector-specific regulations negatively impact industries like Utilities or Real Estate. Its U.S.-centric exposure also ties its performance closely to the health of the domestic economy.

LVHD Top 10 Holdings

LVHD leans heavily on classic U.S. dividend stalwarts, with consumer defensive names like Coca-Cola and Altria doing much of the heavy lifting as they keep rising and provide a steady income backbone. Chevron is also pulling its weight, helped by firmer energy markets, while Verizon and Johnson & Johnson add a mix of stability and modest upside. On the flip side, household giants like Procter & Gamble and Kimberly-Clark have been lagging, which has taken some shine off the fund’s otherwise steady, low-volatility tilt toward utilities, staples, and other defensive sectors.
Name
Company Name
Weight %
Market Value
Market Cap
Yearly Gain
Overall Rating
Coca-Cola2.64%$15.90M$355.47B14.73%
75
Outperform
Altria Group2.63%$15.86M$120.13B18.35%
64
Neutral
Johnson & Johnson2.54%$15.31M$579.83B51.82%
78
Outperform
Kimberly Clark2.52%$15.18M$33.95B-21.07%
63
Neutral
Procter & Gamble2.50%$15.05M$348.38B-6.48%
69
Neutral
Verizon2.49%$15.03M$200.89B13.20%
81
Outperform
US Bancorp2.48%$14.96M$91.49B36.59%
76
Outperform
Chevron2.40%$14.44M$372.87B23.54%
71
Outperform
Home Depot2.31%$13.90M$327.44B-6.71%
66
Neutral
McDonald's2.26%$13.64M$202.36B-3.43%
65
Neutral

LVHD Technical Analysis

Technical Analysis Sentiment
Positive
Last Price
Price Trends
50DMA
42.71
Positive
100DMA
42.74
Positive
200DMA
41.25
Positive
Market Momentum
MACD
0.28
Negative
RSI
61.66
Neutral
STOCH
89.95
Negative
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For LVHD, the sentiment is Positive. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 42.94, equal to the 50-day MA of 42.71, and equal to the 200-day MA of 41.25, indicating a bullish trend. The MACD of 0.28 indicates Negative momentum. The RSI at 61.66 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 89.95 is Negative, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Positive sentiment for LVHD.

LVHD Peer Comparison

Comparison Results
Name
Price
Price Target
AUM
Expense Ratio
Overall Rating
$600.83M0.27%
70
Neutral
$949.14M0.59%
68
Neutral
$906.04M1.30%
65
Neutral
$902.66M0.50%
76
Outperform
$893.15M0.15%
73
Outperform
$860.22M0.27%
71
Outperform
Performance Comparison
Ticker
Company Name
Price
Change
% Change
LVHD
Legg Mason Low Volatility High Dividend ETF
43.75
5.74
15.10%
SYLD
Cambria Shareholder Yield ETF
ULTY
YieldMax Ultra Option Income Strategy ETF
HLAL
Wahed FTSE USA Shariah ETF
FDMO
Fidelity Momentum Factor ETF
AUSF
Global X Adaptive U.S. Factor ETF
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
DisclaimerThis AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents
Advertisement