LVHD - ETF AI Analysis
Top Page
Legg Mason Low Volatility High Dividend ETF (LVHD)
Rating:70Neutral
Price Target:―
Positive Factors
Strong Top Holdings Performance
Most of the largest positions have shown solid gains so far this year, which has helped support the ETF’s overall returns.
Defensive Sector Tilt
Heavy exposure to utilities, consumer defensive, and real estate stocks can make the fund more resilient during market downturns.
Moderate Expense Ratio
The fund’s fee level is reasonable for a specialized strategy, allowing investors to keep more of their returns compared with many actively managed products.
Negative Factors
High U.S. Concentration
With nearly all assets invested in U.S. companies, the ETF offers little geographic diversification and is heavily tied to the U.S. economy.
Sector Concentration Risk
Large weights in a few defensive sectors mean the fund could lag if areas like utilities or real estate fall out of favor.
Some Lagging Holdings
A small number of top positions, such as McDonald’s, have been weak recently, which can slightly drag on overall performance.
LVHD vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)
AUM600.83M
RegionNorth America
Expense Ratio0.27%
Beta0.29
IssuerFranklin
Inception DateDec 28, 2015
Dividend Yield3.28%
Asset ClassEquity
Index TrackedFranklin Low Volatility High Dividend Index (NTR)
Share Statistics
EPS (TTM)N/A
Shares OutstandingN/A
10 Day Avg. Volume52,837
30 Day Avg. Volume57,806
Financial Highlights & Ratios
PEG RatioN/A
Price to Book (P/B)N/A
Price to Sales (P/S)N/A
P/FCF RatioN/A
Enterprise Value/Market CapN/A
Enterprise Value/RevenueN/A
Enterprise Value/Gross ProfitN/A
Enterprise Value/EbitdaN/A
Forecast
1Y Price Target
47.46Price Target Upside― Downside
Rating ConsensusModerate Buy
Number of Analyst Covering114
EPS Forecast (FY)N/A
Revenue Forecast (FY)N/A
LVHD Summary
LVHD is an exchange-traded fund that follows the Franklin Low Volatility High Dividend Index, focusing on U.S. companies that pay relatively high dividends and tend to have smaller price swings. It holds well-known names like Coca-Cola and Johnson & Johnson, along with many utilities and consumer defensive stocks that aim to provide steady income. Someone might consider this ETF if they want regular dividend payments and a smoother ride than the overall stock market. A key risk is that it still invests in stocks, so its value can go up and down with the market, and its focus on dividend payers may lag fast-growing sectors.
How much will it cost me?The Legg Mason Low Volatility High Dividend ETF (LVHD) has an expense ratio of 0.27%, which means you’ll pay $2.70 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is slightly higher than average for passively managed ETFs because it uses a strategic approach to select lower-volatility, high-dividend stocks, requiring more active oversight. It’s designed to balance income and stability for investors.
What would affect this ETF?The LVHD ETF, with its focus on high-dividend, low-volatility stocks in sectors like Utilities and Consumer Defensive, could benefit from stable economic conditions and increased demand for income-generating investments, especially during periods of market uncertainty. However, it may face challenges if interest rates rise, as higher yields on bonds could make dividend-focused ETFs less attractive, or if sector-specific regulations negatively impact industries like Utilities or Real Estate. Its U.S.-centric exposure also ties its performance closely to the health of the domestic economy.
LVHD Top 10 Holdings
LVHD leans heavily on classic U.S. dividend stalwarts, with consumer defensive names like Coca-Cola and Altria doing much of the heavy lifting as they keep rising and provide a steady income backbone. Chevron is also pulling its weight, helped by firmer energy markets, while Verizon and Johnson & Johnson add a mix of stability and modest upside. On the flip side, household giants like Procter & Gamble and Kimberly-Clark have been lagging, which has taken some shine off the fund’s otherwise steady, low-volatility tilt toward utilities, staples, and other defensive sectors.
Name | Company Name | Weight % | Market Value | Market Cap | Yearly Gain | Overall Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coca-Cola | 2.64% | $15.90M | $355.47B | 14.73% | 75 Outperform | |
| Altria Group | 2.63% | $15.86M | $120.13B | 18.35% | 64 Neutral | |
| Johnson & Johnson | 2.54% | $15.31M | $579.83B | 51.82% | 78 Outperform | |
| Kimberly Clark | 2.52% | $15.18M | $33.95B | -21.07% | 63 Neutral | |
| Procter & Gamble | 2.50% | $15.05M | $348.38B | -6.48% | 69 Neutral | |
| Verizon | 2.49% | $15.03M | $200.89B | 13.20% | 81 Outperform | |
| US Bancorp | 2.48% | $14.96M | $91.49B | 36.59% | 76 Outperform | |
| Chevron | 2.40% | $14.44M | $372.87B | 23.54% | 71 Outperform | |
| Home Depot | 2.31% | $13.90M | $327.44B | -6.71% | 66 Neutral | |
| McDonald's | 2.26% | $13.64M | $202.36B | -3.43% | 65 Neutral |
LVHD Technical Analysis
Positive
―
Price Trends
42.71
Positive
42.74
Positive
41.25
Positive
Market Momentum
0.28
Negative
61.66
Neutral
89.95
Negative
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For LVHD, the sentiment is Positive. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 42.94, equal to the 50-day MA of 42.71, and equal to the 200-day MA of 41.25, indicating a bullish trend. The MACD of 0.28 indicates Negative momentum. The RSI at 61.66 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 89.95 is Negative, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Positive sentiment for LVHD.
LVHD Peer Comparison
Comparison Results
Performance Comparison
LVHD
Legg Mason Low Volatility High Dividend ETF
43.75
5.74
15.10%
SYLD
Cambria Shareholder Yield ETF
―
―
―
ULTY
YieldMax Ultra Option Income Strategy ETF
―
―
―
HLAL
Wahed FTSE USA Shariah ETF
―
―
―
FDMO
Fidelity Momentum Factor ETF
―
―
―
AUSF
Global X Adaptive U.S. Factor ETF
―
―
―
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
DisclaimerThis AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents