TipRanks
Advertisement

LVHD - ETF AI Analysis

Compare

Top Page

LVHD

Legg Mason Low Volatility High Dividend ETF (LVHD)

Rating:70Outperform
Price Target:―
LVHD’s rating suggests it is a relatively solid, income-focused ETF that aims to balance steady dividends with lower volatility. Strong, stable companies like Verizon, Johnson & Johnson, PepsiCo, and Coca-Cola support the fund’s quality through solid cash flows, strategic growth plans, and reliable dividends, while more mixed names such as Kimberly-Clark and Altria, which face leverage, technical, and industry challenges, slightly weigh on the overall assessment. The main risk is that the fund is heavily built around mature, dividend-paying companies, so it may lag more growth-oriented markets and is exposed to sector-specific issues in staples, telecom, and energy.
Positive Factors
Strong Top Holdings
Most of the largest positions, including well-known dividend payers like Altria, Chevron, Johnson & Johnson, and Coca-Cola, have shown strong year-to-date performance, helping support the fund’s returns.
Defensive Sector Tilt
Heavy exposure to traditionally steady areas like utilities, consumer defensive, and real estate can help smooth out returns during market volatility.
Solid Recent Performance
The ETF’s year-to-date and recent three-month results have been strong, indicating that its low-volatility, high-dividend strategy has been working well in the current market.
Negative Factors
U.S.-Only Focus
With almost all assets in U.S. companies, the fund offers very limited international diversification and is heavily tied to the health of the U.S. economy.
Sector Concentration Risk
Large weights in utilities, consumer defensive, and real estate mean the fund could be hurt if these sectors face pressure at the same time.
Mixed Performance Among Top Holdings
While many top holdings are doing well, some names like Home Depot have been weak year-to-date, which can drag on overall returns if the weakness continues.

LVHD vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)

LVHD Summary

LVHD is the Legg Mason Low Volatility High Dividend ETF, built to track the Franklin Low Volatility High Dividend Index. It focuses mainly on U.S. companies that pay steady dividends and tend to have smaller price swings, with big names like Coca-Cola and Johnson & Johnson among its top holdings. Many of its stocks come from defensive areas such as utilities and consumer staples, which can help provide regular income and smoother returns over time. A key risk is that, even with lower volatility, the ETF’s value can still go up and down with the stock market and may lag during strong growth or tech-led rallies.
How much will it cost me?The Legg Mason Low Volatility High Dividend ETF (LVHD) has an expense ratio of 0.27%, which means you’ll pay $2.70 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is slightly higher than average for passively managed ETFs because it uses a strategic approach to select lower-volatility, high-dividend stocks, requiring more active oversight. It’s designed to balance income and stability for investors.
What would affect this ETF?The LVHD ETF, with its focus on high-dividend, low-volatility stocks in sectors like Utilities and Consumer Defensive, could benefit from stable economic conditions and increased demand for income-generating investments, especially during periods of market uncertainty. However, it may face challenges if interest rates rise, as higher yields on bonds could make dividend-focused ETFs less attractive, or if sector-specific regulations negatively impact industries like Utilities or Real Estate. Its U.S.-centric exposure also ties its performance closely to the health of the domestic economy.

LVHD Top 10 Holdings

LVHD leans heavily on classic U.S. defensive names, with consumer staples and utilities doing most of the heavy lifting. Johnson & Johnson and Chevron have been steady climbers, helping to prop up overall returns, while Procter & Gamble adds a more modest but reliable boost. On the other side of the ledger, Kimberly-Clark, PepsiCo, and McDonald’s have been lagging, acting like a brake on the fund’s progress. With its top holdings clustered in dividend-rich, low-volatility sectors, this ETF is clearly built for stability over sizzle.
Name
Company Name
Weight %
Market Value
Market Cap
Yearly Gain
Overall Rating
Coca-Cola2.92%$17.21M$368.51B28.51%
75
Outperform
Johnson & Johnson2.90%$17.06M$617.01B35.72%
78
Outperform
Chevron2.81%$16.58M$408.37B34.61%
71
Outperform
Verizon2.77%$16.34M$190.79B5.15%
81
Outperform
Altria Group2.60%$15.32M$112.46B2.46%
64
Neutral
Procter & Gamble2.58%$15.20M$336.58B-4.83%
69
Neutral
US Bancorp2.57%$15.12M$89.60B19.64%
76
Outperform
PepsiCo2.47%$14.58M$171.83B-11.33%
78
Outperform
Kimberly Clark2.47%$14.54M$31.38B-23.02%
63
Neutral
McDonald's2.35%$13.85M$164.09B-22.96%
65
Neutral

LVHD Technical Analysis

Technical Analysis Sentiment
Negative
Last Price―
Price Trends
50DMA
43.69
Negative
100DMA
43.48
Negative
200DMA
42.59
Negative
Market Momentum
MACD
-0.68
Positive
RSI
24.55
Positive
STOCH
21.29
Neutral
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For LVHD, the sentiment is Negative. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 42.51, equal to the 50-day MA of 43.69, and equal to the 200-day MA of 42.59, indicating a bearish trend. The MACD of -0.68 indicates Positive momentum. The RSI at 24.55 is Positive, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 21.29 is Neutral, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Negative sentiment for LVHD.

LVHD Peer Comparison

Comparison Results
Name
Price
Price Target
AUM
Expense Ratio
Overall Rating
――$584.34M0.27%
70
Outperform
――$978.33M0.50%
76
Outperform
――$964.32M0.59%
68
Neutral
――$926.19M0.30%
73
Outperform
――$875.63M0.15%
72
Outperform
――$861.91M0.27%
71
Outperform
Performance Comparison
Ticker
Company Name
Price
Change
% Change
LVHD
Legg Mason Low Volatility High Dividend ETF
41.48
1.71
4.30%
HLAL
Wahed FTSE USA Shariah ETF
―
―
―
SYLD
Cambria Shareholder Yield ETF
―
―
―
SEUS
SEI QiM U.S. Equity Factor Allocation Active ETF
―
―
―
FDMO
Fidelity Momentum Factor ETF
―
―
―
AUSF
Global X Adaptive U.S. Factor ETF
―
―
―
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
DisclaimerThis AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents
Advertisement