KVLE - ETF AI Analysis
Top Page
KFA Value Liner Dynamic Core Equity Index ETF (KVLE)
Rating:71Outperform
Price Target:―
Positive Factors
Strong Overall Performance
The fund’s year-to-date and recent three-month returns have been strong, showing solid momentum in the current market.
Leading Blue-Chip Holdings
Several top positions like Nvidia, Broadcom, Alphabet, Apple, Goldman Sachs, Johnson & Johnson, Cisco, and JPMorgan have delivered strong gains, helping support the ETF’s performance.
Broad Sector Diversification
The ETF spreads its investments across many sectors, including technology, financials, real estate, industrials, consumer, health care, and energy, which helps reduce reliance on any single industry.
Negative Factors
Higher Expense Ratio
The fund’s expense ratio is on the higher side for an ETF, which means more of the returns are used to cover fees.
Heavy U.S. Market Dependence
With almost all assets invested in U.S. companies, the ETF is highly sensitive to the U.S. economy and offers little geographic diversification.
Mixed Results Among Top Holdings
While many top holdings are performing well, some large positions like Microsoft and Automatic Data Processing have shown weaker recent performance, which can drag on overall returns.
KVLE vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)
AUM41.12M
RegionNorth America
Expense Ratio0.56%
Beta0.82
IssuerKraneShares
Inception DateNov 24, 2020
Dividend Yield8.17%
Asset ClassEquity
Index TrackedValue Line Dynamic Dividend Equity Index
Share Statistics
EPS (TTM)N/A
Shares OutstandingN/A
10 Day Avg. Volume2,023
30 Day Avg. Volume2,165
Financial Highlights & Ratios
PEG RatioN/A
Price to Book (P/B)N/A
Price to Sales (P/S)N/A
P/FCF RatioN/A
Enterprise Value/Market CapN/A
Enterprise Value/RevenueN/A
Enterprise Value/Gross ProfitN/A
Enterprise Value/EbitdaN/A
Forecast
1Y Price Target
33.67Price Target Upside― Downside
Rating ConsensusModerate Buy
Number of Analyst Covering81
EPS Forecast (FY)N/A
Revenue Forecast (FY)N/A
KVLE Summary
KVLE is an ETF that follows the Value Line Dynamic Dividend Equity Index, focusing on large U.S. companies that appear undervalued but financially solid. It holds many well-known names like Microsoft and Nvidia, along with firms from technology, finance, health care, and more, giving investors broad exposure to major parts of the U.S. stock market. Someone might invest in KVLE for long-term growth and diversification, especially if they like the idea of buying strong companies at attractive prices. A key risk is that the fund’s value can rise or fall with the overall stock market, especially tech stocks.
How much will it cost me?The expense ratio for KVLE is 0.56%, which means you’ll pay $5.60 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is higher than average because KVLE is actively managed, aiming to select undervalued large-cap stocks with strong growth potential.
What would affect this ETF?KVLE’s focus on large-cap value stocks, particularly in technology and financial sectors, could benefit from strong corporate earnings and innovation within these industries. However, rising interest rates or economic slowdowns may negatively impact growth prospects for these sectors, especially technology companies like Microsoft and Nvidia, which are top holdings. Additionally, regulatory changes in the U.S., where the ETF is geographically concentrated, could create challenges for certain industries within the portfolio.
KVLE Top 10 Holdings
KVLE is leaning heavily on U.S. large-cap value names, with a clear tilt toward tech and financials. Nvidia and Micron are the headline drivers, riding the AI wave and giving the fund much of its recent spark, while Broadcom has been more mixed and occasionally acts like a brake on the semiconductor engine. Microsoft adds steady, rising support from cloud and AI, and JPMorgan plus Goldman Sachs provide a solid, if more traditional, backbone from the financial sector. Overall, it’s a U.S.-centric, tech-flavored value play with a few standout winners pulling the cart.
Name | Company Name | Weight % | Market Value | Market Cap | Yearly Gain | Overall Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nvidia | 5.82% | $2.37M | $5.15T | 24.46% | 76 Outperform | |
| Broadcom | 3.02% | $1.23M | $1.62T | 0.56% | 76 Outperform | |
| Microsoft | 2.56% | $1.04M | $3.64T | -3.90% | 79 Outperform | |
| Cisco Systems | 1.98% | $803.63K | $424.77B | 61.62% | 77 Outperform | |
| Texas Instruments | 1.82% | $737.96K | $238.06B | 42.13% | 78 Outperform | |
| Goldman Sachs Group | 1.80% | $731.62K | $273.11B | 18.20% | 73 Outperform | |
| Conagra Brands | 1.74% | $706.90K | $7.26B | -19.04% | 52 Neutral | |
| Automatic Data Processing | 1.71% | $695.27K | $108.53B | -6.43% | 70 Outperform | |
| Bristol-Myers Squibb | 1.68% | $682.11K | $129.92B | 39.58% | 78 Outperform | |
| Simon Property | 1.66% | $673.35K | $65.66B | 13.54% | 70 Outperform |
KVLE Technical Analysis
Neutral
―
Price Trends
28.82
Negative
28.20
Positive
26.96
Positive
Market Momentum
-0.18
Positive
39.16
Neutral
13.46
Positive
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For KVLE, the sentiment is Neutral. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 28.90, equal to the 50-day MA of 28.82, and equal to the 200-day MA of 26.96, indicating a neutral trend. The MACD of -0.18 indicates Positive momentum. The RSI at 39.16 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 13.46 is Positive, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Neutral sentiment for KVLE.
KVLE Peer Comparison
Comparison Results
Performance Comparison
KVLE
KFA Value Liner Dynamic Core Equity Index ETF
28.30
3.05
12.08%
PQUS
Pictet AI Enhanced US Equity ETF
―
―
―
PRMR
PeakShares RMR Prime Equity ETF
―
―
―
ALTL
Pacer Lunt Large Cap Alternator ETF
―
―
―
FCUS
Pinnacle Focused Opportunities ETF
―
―
―
SPXE
ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Energy ETF
―
―
―
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
DisclaimerThis AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents