GVIP - ETF AI Analysis
Top Page
Goldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF (GVIP)
GVIP’s rating suggests it is a solid but not top-tier ETF, supported by strong core holdings like Microsoft and Apple, which benefit from robust financial performance, growth in cloud, AI, and services, and generally positive long-term outlooks. These strengths are partly offset by weaker names such as Snowflake and Vistra Energy, where profitability, leverage, valuation concerns, and some bearish technical signals introduce more risk. The main risk factor is the fund’s reliance on a concentrated set of large, growth-oriented stocks, which can make performance more sensitive to shifts in market sentiment toward high-valuation companies.
GVIP vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)
- AUM
- 555.93M
- Region
- North America
- Expense Ratio
- 0.45%
- Beta
- 1.23
- Issuer
- Goldman Sachs
- Inception Date
- Nov 01, 2016
- Dividend Yield
- 0.33%
- Asset Class
- Equity
- Index Tracked
- Goldman Sachs Hedge Fund VIP Index
GVIP Summary
GVIP is an ETF that follows the Goldman Sachs Hedge Fund VIP Index, which tracks the favorite U.S. stock picks of major hedge funds. It mainly invests in large, well-known companies across many sectors, including technology, finance, and health care. Top holdings include household names like Apple and Microsoft, as well as Berkshire Hathaway. Someone might invest in GVIP to tap into the combined stock ideas of professional hedge fund managers while getting broad diversification across the U.S. market. A key risk is that these stocks can be volatile and may go up or down sharply with overall market swings.
How much will it cost me?
GVIP has an expense ratio of 0.45%, which means you’ll pay about $4.50 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is higher than the average low-cost index ETF because GVIP is actively managed to follow hedge funds’ favorite stock picks, which requires more research and trading.
What would affect this ETF?
GVIP could benefit if major U.S. technology and financial companies like Apple, Microsoft, Visa, and Mastercard keep growing, and if overall economic conditions in the U.S. remain supportive of corporate profits and innovation. On the downside, rising interest rates, tighter regulations on big tech or financial firms, or a broad market downturn that hurts hedge fund favorites such as Meta and Berkshire Hathaway could weigh on this ETF’s performance.
GVIP Top 10 Holdings
GVIP is essentially a hedge-fund highlight reel, with Big Tech and chip names setting the tone. Microsoft and Apple are keeping the fund on a steady, upward track, while AMD has been more of a rocket ship this year, giving performance an extra boost despite some recent wobbling. On the flip side, Meta has been mixed and occasionally drags on returns, and S&P Global has lost some steam. Financial heavyweights like Visa, Mastercard, and Berkshire Hathaway add stability, rounding out a U.S.-centric portfolio that leans hard into technology and financials.
| Name | Company Name | Weight % | Market Value | Market Cap | Yearly Gain | Overall Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 TMO | Thermo Fisher | 2.68% | $14.86M | $257.71B | 25.31% | 72Outperform |
 AMD | Advanced Micro Devices | 2.44% | $13.57M | $824.07B | 98.09% | 73Outperform |
 AAPL | Apple | 2.53% | $14.06M | $5.03T | 26.98% | 79Outperform |
 V | Visa | 2.50% | $13.90M | $782.42B | 19.87% | 70Outperform |
 LLY | Eli Lilly & Co | 2.58% | $14.35M | $1.33T | 67.86% | 72Outperform |
 SPGI | S&P Global | 2.44% | $13.56M | $135.25B | -5.09% | 73Outperform |
 BRK.B | Berkshire Hathaway B | 2.39% | $13.25M | $1.16T | 13.37% | 66Neutral |
 MA | Mastercard | 2.48% | $13.76M | $559.19B | 15.23% | 75Outperform |
 MSFT | Microsoft | 2.38% | $13.19M | $3.88T | -0.73% | 79Outperform |
 META | Meta Platforms | 2.35% | $13.05M | $1.57T | -7.72% | 76Outperform |
GVIP Technical Analysis
Price Trends
Market Momentum
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For GVIP, the sentiment is Negative. The current price of 158.70 is below the 20-day moving average (MA) of 166.34, below the 50-day MA of 169.20, and below the 200-day MA of 167.12, indicating a bearish trend. The MACD of -2.67 indicates Positive momentum. The RSI at 35.74 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 48.70 is Neutral, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Negative sentiment for GVIP.
GVIP Peer Comparison
Comparison Results
| Name | Price | Price Target | AUM | Expense Ratio | Overall Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GVIP | $158.70 | $185.00(16.57% Upside) | $555.93M | 0.45% | 68Neutral |
 HLAL | $71.52 | $91.83(28.39% Upside) | $972.36M | 0.50% | 76Outperform |
 SEUS | $25.65 | $30.94(20.62% Upside) | $946.37M | 0.30% | 73Outperform |
 BGDV | $31.27 | $37.25(19.11% Upside) | $877.55M | 0.45% | 74Outperform |
 AUSF | $51.89 | $57.33(10.48% Upside) | $902.41M | 0.27% | 71Outperform |
 AAUB | $49.94 | $60.90(21.95% Upside) | $845.51M | 0.10% | 66Neutral |
Performance Comparison
| Show on chart | Ticker | Company Name | Price | Change | % Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GVIP | Goldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF | 158.70 | 3.44 | 2.21% | |
| HLAL | Wahed FTSE USA Shariah ETF | 71.52 | 10.37 | 16.96% | |
| SEUS | SEI QiM U.S. Equity Factor Allocation Active ETF | 25.65 | 0.39 | 1.53% | |
| BGDV | Bahl & Gaynor Dividend ETF | 31.27 | 5.03 | 19.16% | |
| AUSF | Global X Adaptive U.S. Factor ETF | 51.89 | 8.17 | 18.69% | |
| AAUB | Alpha Architect US Equity 4 ETF | 49.94 | 0.45 | 0.91% |
This AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.