TipRanks
Advertisement

GSIB - ETF AI Analysis

Compare

Top Page

GSIB

Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF (GSIB)

Rating:71Outperform
Price Target:―
GSIB, the Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF, has a solid overall rating driven mainly by strong, attractively valued global banks like China Construction Bank and Industrial and Commercial Bank of China, which show robust profitability, healthy balance sheets, and supportive technical trends. Several other major holdings, including Mitsubishi UFJ and Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group, add to the strength with solid revenue growth and reasonable valuations, though issues like high leverage, cash flow challenges, and sector-specific risks such as real estate exposure and narrowing net interest margins slightly weigh on the fund. The main risk factor is the ETF’s concentration in large global banks, which makes it sensitive to financial sector and credit-cycle downturns.
Positive Factors
Strong Recent Performance
The ETF has shown strong gains so far this year and over the last three months, indicating solid recent momentum.
Healthy Top Holdings Performance
Most of the largest bank holdings have delivered strong year-to-date returns, helping support the fund’s overall results.
Focused Global Bank Exposure
The fund targets major systemically important banks across several countries, giving investors concentrated exposure to leading global financial institutions.
Negative Factors
Heavy Sector Concentration
Nearly all of the portfolio is in financial stocks, so the ETF is highly sensitive to downturns in the banking sector.
Single Country and Region Tilt
With most assets in U.S. banks and significant exposure to Hong Kong and China, the fund is vulnerable to economic or regulatory shocks in these markets.
Mixed Performance Among Top Holdings
One of the largest positions has shown weak year-to-date performance, which can drag on the fund if that trend continues.

GSIB vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)

GSIB Summary

The Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF (GSIB) invests in some of the world’s largest and most important banks, often called “too big to fail” institutions. It doesn’t track a traditional index, but instead focuses on major global banks, mainly in the U.S., with additional exposure to Asia and Europe. Well-known holdings include HSBC and Bank of New York Mellon. Someone might invest in GSIB to get diversified exposure to big global banks that are central to the financial system. A key risk is that it is heavily concentrated in the banking sector, so it can rise or fall sharply with financial industry conditions.
How much will it cost me?The Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF (GSIB) has an expense ratio of 0.35%, meaning you’ll pay $3.50 per year for every $1,000 invested. This cost is slightly higher than average for ETFs because it is actively managed, focusing on a niche sector of global systemically important banks.
What would affect this ETF?The GSIB ETF could benefit from global economic growth and increased financial activity, as well as regulatory measures that enhance the stability of systemically important banks. However, it may face challenges from rising interest rates, economic slowdowns, or geopolitical tensions that could disrupt global banking operations and profitability.

GSIB Top 10 Holdings

GSIB is essentially a who’s who of global megabanks, with performance currently powered by rising names like State Street, Bank of New York Mellon, and ING Groep, all benefiting from solid earnings and upbeat sentiment around financials. On the flip side, Mitsubishi UFJ has been a bit more mixed lately, and Deutsche Bank’s patchy profitability can occasionally act as a speed bump. There’s a clear concentration in large, systemically important banks, and the fund is truly global, blending U.S. custodial giants with major European and Chinese lenders at the core of the portfolio.
Name
Company Name
Weight %
Market Value
Market Cap
Yearly Gain
Overall Rating
Toronto Dominion Bank3.62%$1.67M$206.80B55.75%
74
Outperform
Agricultural Bank of China3.61%$1.66MHK$2.77T31.75%
76
Outperform
HSBC Holdings3.61%$1.66M$342.35B45.36%
78
Outperform
Goldman Sachs Group3.60%$1.66M$276.46B19.82%
73
Outperform
Royal Bank Of Canada3.59%$1.65M$282.21B37.68%
75
Outperform
Morgan Stanley3.59%$1.65M$314.40B26.79%
76
Outperform
Bank of Communications Co3.58%$1.65MHK$781.17B25.44%
76
Outperform
Citigroup3.58%$1.65M$222.21B28.61%
68
Neutral
Banco Santander SA3.58%$1.64M$210.03B41.36%
72
Outperform
ING Groep3.58%$1.64M$100.52B41.62%
72
Outperform

GSIB Technical Analysis

Technical Analysis Sentiment
Neutral
Last Price―
Price Trends
50DMA
64.35
Negative
100DMA
61.46
Positive
200DMA
57.25
Positive
Market Momentum
MACD
-0.25
Positive
RSI
39.57
Neutral
STOCH
7.18
Positive
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For GSIB, the sentiment is Neutral. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 64.88, equal to the 50-day MA of 64.35, and equal to the 200-day MA of 57.25, indicating a neutral trend. The MACD of -0.25 indicates Positive momentum. The RSI at 39.57 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 7.18 is Positive, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Neutral sentiment for GSIB.

GSIB Peer Comparison

Comparison Results
Name
Price
Price Target
AUM
Expense Ratio
Overall Rating
――$42.75M0.35%
71
Outperform
――$98.49M1.00%
69
Neutral
――$93.73M0.75%
71
Outperform
――$88.49M0.90%
62
Neutral
――$47.12M0.80%
71
Outperform
――$930.07K0.35%
70
Neutral
Performance Comparison
Ticker
Company Name
Price
Change
% Change
GSIB
Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF
62.88
16.11
34.45%
FFND
Future Fund Active ETF
―
―
―
FITZ
Fitz-Gerald Must Have Portfolio ETF
―
―
―
HECO
SPDR Galaxy Hedged Digital Asset Ecosystem ETF
―
―
―
BCFN
Baron Financials ETF
―
―
―
LATR
Corgi Buy Now Pay Later ETF
―
―
―
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
DisclaimerThis AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents
Advertisement