TipRanks
Advertisement

GPZ - ETF AI Analysis

Compare

Top Page

GPZ

VanEck Alternative Asset Manager ETF (GPZ)

Rating:58Neutral
Price Target:―
GPZ, the VanEck Alternative Asset Manager ETF, earns a solid overall rating largely because its biggest positions in firms like Blackstone (BX), Apollo Global Management (APO), and Ares Management (ARES) combine strong financial performance, positive earnings sentiment, and growth in assets under management. These strengths are partly offset by holdings such as Carlyle Group (CG) and ONEX, where high leverage, cash flow pressures, and mixed technical signals introduce caution. The main risk factor is the fund’s concentration in highly leveraged alternative asset managers, which can make it more sensitive to market downturns and valuation concerns.
Positive Factors
Focused Exposure to Alternative Asset Managers
The ETF targets a specialized group of financial companies that benefit from long-term growth in private markets and alternative investments.
Global Reach Across Several Developed Markets
Holdings spread across the U.S., UK, Canada, and parts of Europe provide some geographic diversification instead of relying on a single country.
Moderate Expense Ratio
The fund’s fee is not extremely high for a niche strategy, helping investors keep a reasonable share of any future gains.
Negative Factors
Weak Recent Performance
The ETF has shown negative returns so far this year and over the last few months, indicating recent performance has been soft.
Heavy Concentration in a Few Financial Stocks
A small group of financial companies makes up a large portion of the portfolio, increasing risk if any of these firms struggle.
Top Holdings Have Been Lagging
Most of the largest positions have delivered weak year-to-date results, which has weighed on the fund’s overall momentum.

GPZ vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)

GPZ Summary

GPZ is the VanEck Alternative Asset Manager ETF, which follows the MarketVector Alternative Asset Managers Index. It focuses on financial companies that run alternative investments like private equity and business development companies, mainly in the US but also in Europe and Canada. Well-known holdings include Blackstone and KKR, both major players in private equity. Investors might consider GPZ for growth potential and diversification beyond traditional stocks and bonds, since these firms earn fees from managing large pools of capital. A key risk is that it is heavily concentrated in financial companies, so its value can rise or fall sharply with the fortunes of the asset management industry.
How much will it cost me?The VanEck Alternative Asset Manager ETF (GPZ) has an expense ratio of 0.40%, which means you’ll pay $4 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is slightly higher than average for ETFs because it is focused on a specific niche within the financial sector and may require more active management compared to broad, passively managed funds.
What would affect this ETF?The VanEck Alternative Asset Manager ETF (GPZ) could benefit from growing interest in alternative investments like private equity and business development companies, especially as investors seek diversification beyond traditional financial products. However, it may face challenges from rising interest rates, which can increase borrowing costs for asset managers, and regulatory changes that could impact the operations of firms in this niche. Its focus on developed markets and heavy exposure to financials makes it sensitive to broader economic conditions and sector-specific trends.

GPZ Top 10 Holdings

GPZ is essentially a who’s who of private equity and alternative asset managers, with Blackstone and KKR setting the tone as rising leaders that have recently given the fund a lift. Ares and Apollo are also climbing, adding momentum even as their rich valuations demand a bit of faith. On the flip side, Brookfield Corporation and Carlyle look more like dead weight for now, lagging and softening overall returns. While there’s some European and Canadian flavor, this is still a financials-heavy, U.S.-centric bet on the alternative asset boom.
Name
Company Name
Weight %
Market Value
Market Cap
Yearly Gain
Overall Rating
Brookfield Corporation12.29%$28.51M$84.25B-20.67%―
Blackstone Group12.21%$28.32M$154.00B-32.93%
72
Outperform
KKR & Co10.06%$23.35M$88.36B-33.15%
69
Neutral
Apollo Global Management8.11%$18.83M$73.32B-14.31%
75
Outperform
Brookfield Asset Management Ltd. Class A7.04%$16.34M$75.22B-21.17%―
ONEX Corporation4.57%$10.61MC$8.39B-10.36%
69
Neutral
ICG plc4.57%$10.60M£5.46B-15.87%
76
Outperform
Ares Management4.41%$10.22M$41.19B-31.15%
70
Outperform
EQT AB4.40%$10.20Mkr352.04B-11.52%
68
Neutral
Carlyle Group4.33%$10.05M$14.34B-40.13%
59
Neutral

GPZ Technical Analysis

Technical Analysis Sentiment
Negative
Last Price―
Price Trends
50DMA
23.92
Negative
100DMA
23.31
Negative
200DMA
23.90
Negative
Market Momentum
MACD
-0.57
Positive
RSI
30.38
Neutral
STOCH
23.32
Neutral
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For GPZ, the sentiment is Negative. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 23.62, equal to the 50-day MA of 23.92, and equal to the 200-day MA of 23.90, indicating a bearish trend. The MACD of -0.57 indicates Positive momentum. The RSI at 30.38 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 23.32 is Neutral, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Negative sentiment for GPZ.

GPZ Peer Comparison

Comparison Results
Name
Price
Price Target
AUM
Expense Ratio
Overall Rating
――$229.65M0.40%
58
Neutral
――$451.33M0.13%
70
Outperform
――$335.21M0.49%
61
Neutral
――$209.51M0.68%
58
Neutral
――$178.84M0.99%
50
Neutral
――$165.12M0.68%
66
Neutral
Performance Comparison
Ticker
Company Name
Price
Change
% Change
GPZ
VanEck Alternative Asset Manager ETF
22.03
-5.76
-20.73%
PBOG
Portfolio Building Block Integrated Oil and Gas and Exploration and Production Index ETF
―
―
―
SRVR
Pacer Benchmark Data & Infrastructure Real Estate SCTR ETF
―
―
―
SNSR
Global X Internet of Things ETF
―
―
―
JEDI
Defiance Drone and Modern Warfare ETF
―
―
―
FINX
Global X Fintech Etf
―
―
―
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
DisclaimerThis AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents
Advertisement