GGRW - ETF AI Analysis
Top Page
Gabelli Growth Innovators ETF (GGRW)
GGRW’s rating suggests it is a solid growth-focused ETF, supported by major innovators like Alphabet, Nvidia, Microsoft, and Apple, all showing strong financial performance and long-term growth potential in AI, cloud, and technology. However, several holdings, including Nvidia, Amazon, and Broadcom, face risks from high valuations and some bearish or mixed technical signals, and the fund is heavily tilted toward tech and AI-related names, which increases sector concentration risk.
GGRW vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)
- AUM
- 8.08M
- Region
- North America
- Expense Ratio
- 0.00%
- Beta
- 1.13
- Issuer
- Gabelli
- Inception Date
- Feb 16, 2021
- Dividend Yield
- 0.42%
- Asset Class
- Equity
- Index Tracked
- No Underlying Index
GGRW Summary
Gabelli Growth Innovators ETF (GGRW) is a U.S. stock fund that focuses on fast-growing, innovative companies across the whole market rather than tracking a specific index. It leans heavily toward technology and other growth sectors, with top holdings like Nvidia and Amazon, plus well-known names such as Microsoft and Apple. Someone might invest in GGRW to seek long-term growth and get diversified exposure to many leading innovators in one single investment. A key risk is that growth-focused stocks can be more volatile, so the ETF’s value can rise and fall sharply with changes in the stock market.
How much will it cost me?
This ETF has an expense ratio of 0.00%, which means you’ll pay $0 per year for every $1,000 invested. That’s far lower than the average ETF, and unusually cheap even for a growth-focused, actively managed fund.
What would affect this ETF?
GGRW could benefit if U.S. economic growth stays solid and innovation in areas like cloud computing, artificial intelligence, and digital payments continues to drive gains for major holdings such as Nvidia, Amazon, Alphabet, and Microsoft. On the other hand, rising interest rates, a slowdown in technology and other growth sectors, or tighter regulations on big tech and financial companies could weigh on the fund’s future performance.
GGRW Top 10 Holdings
GGRW is leaning hard into U.S. innovation, with Big Tech and chip names steering the ship. Nvidia and Applied Materials have been stars over the year but are currently losing a bit of altitude, which can tug on short-term returns. Alphabet has been noticeably lagging lately, acting as a brake on the fund’s tech-heavy tilt. On the brighter side, Microsoft and Amazon look steady to rising, while Eli Lilly and Mastercard add a healthy dose of growth outside pure tech. Overall, it’s a concentrated bet on U.S. technology and AI-driven growth.
| Name | Company Name | Weight % | Market Value | Market Cap | Yearly Gain | Overall Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nvidia | 9.39% | $772.39K | $4.93T | 0.86% | 76Outperform | |
| Amazon | 6.12% | $503.07K | $2.59T | 7.85% | 71Outperform | |
| Alphabet Class C | 6.06% | $498.28K | $3.41T | -1.31% | 82Outperform | |
| Microsoft | 4.42% | $363.43K | $3.88T | -0.73% | 79Outperform | |
| Eli Lilly & Co | 4.20% | $344.90K | $1.33T | 67.86% | 72Outperform | |
| Broadcom | 3.98% | $327.06K | $1.56T | -13.38% | 76Outperform | |
| Apple | 3.61% | $296.89K | $5.03T | 26.98% | 79Outperform | |
| GE Vernova Inc. | 3.60% | $295.90K | $227.06B | 49.44% | 69Neutral | |
| Mastercard | 3.57% | $293.31K | $559.19B | 15.23% | 75Outperform | |
| Applied Materials | 3.48% | $285.82K | $309.57B | 67.74% | 77Outperform |
GGRW Technical Analysis
Price Trends
Market Momentum
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For GGRW, the sentiment is Negative. The current price of 35.78 is below the 20-day moving average (MA) of 37.25, below the 50-day MA of 37.27, and below the 200-day MA of 36.18, indicating a bearish trend. The MACD of -0.35 indicates Positive momentum. The RSI at 36.11 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 44.96 is Neutral, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Negative sentiment for GGRW.
GGRW Peer Comparison
Comparison Results
| Name | Price | Price Target | AUM | Expense Ratio | Overall Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| $35.78 | $42.00(17.39% Upside) | $8.08M | 0.00% | 74Outperform | |
| $26.78 | $36.53(36.42% Upside) | $76.92M | 0.67% | 70Neutral | |
| $54.97 | $79.25(44.17% Upside) | $63.77M | 0.75% | 64Neutral | |
| $27.25 | $34.45(26.41% Upside) | $63.84M | 0.60% | 72Outperform | |
| $28.41 | $34.37(20.98% Upside) | $62.28M | 0.57% | 75Outperform | |
| $23.87 | $31.91(33.68% Upside) | $60.29M | 0.38% | 74Outperform |
Performance Comparison
| Show on chart | Ticker | Company Name | Price | Change | % Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GGRW | Gabelli Growth Innovators ETF | 35.78 | -0.22 | -0.62% | |
| TSEL | Touchstone Sands Capital US Select Growth ETF | 26.78 | -3.46 | -11.45% | |
| ZDIS | Virtus Zevenbergen Discovery Growth ETF | 54.97 | -8.87 | -13.89% | |
| SEMG | Suncoast Select Growth ETF | 27.25 | 0.12 | 0.46% | |
| JGRW | Jensen Quality Growth ETF | 28.41 | 1.50 | 5.56% | |
| NSIG | North Square Growth Opportunities ETF | 23.87 | -1.44 | -5.68% |
This AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.