JGRW - ETF AI Analysis
Top Page
Jensen Quality Growth ETF (JGRW)
Rating:75Outperform
Price Target:―
Positive Factors
Strong Mega-Cap Tech Leaders
Several of the largest positions, including major technology names like Apple, Amazon, Alphabet, and Nvidia, have shown strong recent performance, helping support the ETF’s returns.
Broad Sector Diversification
The fund spreads its investments across multiple sectors such as technology, health care, consumer, industrials, financials, and communication services, which helps reduce the impact of weakness in any single industry.
Recent Positive Performance Trend
The ETF has delivered steady gains over the past month and quarter, suggesting its current mix of holdings has been working well in the recent market environment.
Negative Factors
High Concentration in Technology
With a large portion of assets in the technology sector, the fund could be more sensitive to a downturn in tech stocks than a more evenly balanced ETF.
Mixed Results Among Top Holdings
Some key positions, including large names like Microsoft, Mastercard, Stryker, and Marsh & McLennan, have shown weaker recent performance, which can drag on overall returns.
Limited Geographic Diversification
Almost all of the ETF’s holdings are in U.S. companies, so investors get little exposure to international markets and may be more exposed to U.S.-specific economic risks.
JGRW vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)
AUM72.49M
RegionNorth America
Expense Ratio0.57%
Beta0.81
IssuerJensen
Inception DateAug 13, 2024
Dividend Yield0.38%
Asset ClassEquity
Index TrackedNo Underlying Index
Share Statistics
EPS (TTM)N/A
Shares OutstandingN/A
10 Day Avg. Volume12,716
30 Day Avg. Volume11,633
Financial Highlights & Ratios
PEG RatioN/A
Price to Book (P/B)N/A
Price to Sales (P/S)N/A
P/FCF RatioN/A
Enterprise Value/Market CapN/A
Enterprise Value/RevenueN/A
Enterprise Value/Gross ProfitN/A
Enterprise Value/EbitdaN/A
Forecast
1Y Price Target
34.14Price Target Upside― Downside
Rating ConsensusStrong Buy
Number of Analyst Covering29
EPS Forecast (FY)N/A
Revenue Forecast (FY)N/A
JGRW Summary
The Jensen Quality Growth ETF (JGRW) is an actively managed fund that focuses on high-quality growth companies across the U.S. stock market, rather than tracking a specific index. It leans heavily toward technology and health care, with well-known holdings like Apple and Amazon, along with other large, established businesses. Someone might invest in JGRW to seek long-term growth while still focusing on companies with strong profits and solid financial health. A key risk is that it is heavily tilted toward growth and tech-related stocks, so its price can rise and fall more than the overall market.
How much will it cost me?The Jensen Quality Growth ETF (JGRW) has an expense ratio of 0.57%, which means you’ll pay $5.70 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is higher than the average for ETFs because it is actively managed, focusing on selecting high-quality growth companies rather than tracking an index. Active management typically involves more research and decision-making, which increases costs.
What would affect this ETF?The Jensen Quality Growth ETF (JGRW) could benefit from continued innovation and strong performance in the technology and healthcare sectors, which make up a significant portion of its holdings. However, rising interest rates or economic slowdowns could negatively impact growth-oriented companies, particularly in sectors like technology and financials. Regulatory changes or geopolitical tensions affecting U.S.-based companies may also pose risks to the ETF's future performance.
JGRW Top 10 Holdings
JGRW leans heavily into U.S. Big Tech, with Apple and Nvidia acting as twin engines for recent gains as their momentum in devices and AI keeps the fund’s growth story humming. Microsoft and Alphabet are more steady contributors, offering ballast even as their short-term moves look a bit mixed. Amazon has been choppier, occasionally losing its footing and dampening returns. Outside tech, KLA’s strong run adds extra spark, while names like Marsh & McLennan and Sherwin-Williams have been lagging, modestly tugging performance back.
Name | Company Name | Weight % | Market Value | Market Cap | Yearly Gain | Overall Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Microsoft | 7.61% | $5.67M | $3.97T | 4.72% | 79 Outperform | |
| Amazon | 7.50% | $5.59M | $2.83T | 21.29% | 71 Outperform | |
| Alphabet Class A | 7.44% | $5.54M | $4.28T | 48.65% | 85 Outperform | |
| Nvidia | 5.62% | $4.19M | $5.53T | 25.18% | 76 Outperform | |
| Apple | 5.54% | $4.13M | $4.91T | 37.25% | 79 Outperform | |
| Mastercard | 5.27% | $3.92M | $516.09B | 5.68% | 75 Outperform | |
| Broadcom | 4.77% | $3.56M | $1.73T | 11.37% | 76 Outperform | |
| Marsh & McLennan Companies | 4.44% | $3.31M | $83.87B | -15.10% | 71 Outperform | |
| Waste Management | 4.42% | $3.30M | $83.47B | -4.75% | 76 Outperform | |
| Eli Lilly & Co | 3.94% | $2.94M | $1.11T | 41.48% | 72 Outperform |
JGRW Technical Analysis
Positive
―
Price Trends
28.01
Positive
27.54
Positive
26.80
Positive
Market Momentum
0.13
Negative
64.61
Neutral
99.64
Negative
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For JGRW, the sentiment is Positive. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 27.70, equal to the 50-day MA of 28.01, and equal to the 200-day MA of 26.80, indicating a bullish trend. The MACD of 0.13 indicates Negative momentum. The RSI at 64.61 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 99.64 is Negative, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Positive sentiment for JGRW.
JGRW Peer Comparison
Comparison Results
Performance Comparison
JGRW
Jensen Quality Growth ETF
28.34
1.59
5.94%
TSEL
Touchstone Sands Capital US Select Growth ETF
―
―
―
ZDIS
Virtus Zevenbergen Discovery Growth ETF
―
―
―
SEMG
Suncoast Select Growth ETF
―
―
―
NSIG
North Square Growth Opportunities ETF
―
―
―
RILA
Indexperts Gorilla Aggressive Growth ETF
―
―
―
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
DisclaimerThis AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents