tiprankstipranks
Advertisement

JGRW - ETF AI Analysis

Compare

Top Page

JGRW

Jensen Quality Growth ETF (JGRW)

Rating:74Outperform
Price Target:
JGRW, the Jensen Quality Growth ETF, earns a solid overall rating thanks to its heavy exposure to high-quality, financially strong tech leaders like Alphabet, Apple, Microsoft, Nvidia, and Amazon, all benefiting from growth in areas such as cloud computing and AI. This strength is partly offset by holdings like Sherwin-Williams and Stryker, where bearish technical trends and premium valuations introduce more caution. The main risk factor is the fund’s concentration in large, growth-oriented companies, which can make performance more sensitive to shifts in market sentiment toward high-valuation stocks.
Positive Factors
Leading Mega-Cap Growth Holdings
The ETF’s largest positions include well-known technology and growth companies, several of which have shown strong recent performance and help support the fund’s returns.
Focused but Multi-Sector Exposure
While technology is the largest slice, the fund also holds stocks in communication services, health care, financials, and other sectors, which helps spread risk across different parts of the economy.
Recent Short-Term Rebound
Despite a weak year-to-date result, the ETF has shown a strong gain over the past month, suggesting some positive short-term momentum in its holdings.
Negative Factors
High Technology Concentration
A large share of the portfolio is in technology stocks, which can make the fund more sensitive to downturns in that single sector.
Several Key Holdings Are Lagging
Some of the top positions, including major technology and health care names, have shown weak performance this year, which has weighed on overall returns.
Higher Expense Ratio for an ETF
The fund’s expense ratio is on the higher side for an ETF, meaning more of the investment’s return is used to cover fees.

JGRW vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)

JGRW Summary

The Jensen Quality Growth ETF (JGRW) is an actively managed fund that focuses on high-quality growth companies across the U.S. stock market, rather than tracking a specific index. It leans heavily toward technology and communication services, with major holdings like Microsoft and Alphabet (Google’s parent company), plus other well-known names such as Apple and Amazon. Someone might invest in JGRW to seek long-term growth by owning a concentrated group of strong, financially healthy businesses. A key risk is that it’s heavily tilted toward growth and tech-related stocks, so its price can rise and fall more than the overall market.
How much will it cost me?The Jensen Quality Growth ETF (JGRW) has an expense ratio of 0.57%, which means you’ll pay $5.70 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is higher than the average for ETFs because it is actively managed, focusing on selecting high-quality growth companies rather than tracking an index. Active management typically involves more research and decision-making, which increases costs.
What would affect this ETF?The Jensen Quality Growth ETF (JGRW) could benefit from continued innovation and strong performance in the technology and healthcare sectors, which make up a significant portion of its holdings. However, rising interest rates or economic slowdowns could negatively impact growth-oriented companies, particularly in sectors like technology and financials. Regulatory changes or geopolitical tensions affecting U.S.-based companies may also pose risks to the ETF's future performance.

JGRW Top 10 Holdings

JGRW is leaning heavily on U.S. Big Tech, with Alphabet, Amazon, Nvidia, Apple, and Microsoft forming the core engine of the fund. Nvidia and Apple have been the brighter spots recently, still humming along on AI and services strength, while Alphabet and Amazon show mixed momentum after earlier gains. Microsoft, however, has been losing steam and acting as a drag. Outside tech, KLA has been a standout riser, helping offset weakness from steadier names like Sherwin-Williams and softer trends in Mastercard, keeping the portfolio firmly U.S.-centric and growth-focused.
Name
Company Name
Weight %
Market Value
Market Cap
Yearly Gain
Overall Rating
Alphabet Class A6.74%$5.95M$4.46T111.68%
85
Outperform
Amazon6.55%$5.77M$2.63T11.66%
71
Outperform
Microsoft6.27%$5.53M$2.82T-24.42%
79
Outperform
Nvidia6.17%$5.44M$5.10T44.72%
76
Outperform
Apple6.13%$5.41M$4.38T47.40%
79
Outperform
KLA5.88%$5.18M$339.06B214.34%
77
Outperform
Eli Lilly & Co5.11%$4.51M$1.03T43.01%
72
Outperform
Stryker4.86%$4.29M$118.00B-19.64%
70
Outperform
Sherwin-Williams Company4.80%$4.23M$79.12B-7.82%
66
Neutral
Mastercard4.49%$3.96M$432.77B-10.74%
75
Outperform

JGRW Technical Analysis

Technical Analysis Sentiment
Positive
Last Price
Price Trends
50DMA
26.73
Positive
100DMA
26.07
Positive
200DMA
26.50
Positive
Market Momentum
MACD
0.07
Negative
RSI
60.19
Neutral
STOCH
97.87
Negative
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For JGRW, the sentiment is Positive. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 26.74, equal to the 50-day MA of 26.73, and equal to the 200-day MA of 26.50, indicating a bullish trend. The MACD of 0.07 indicates Negative momentum. The RSI at 60.19 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 97.87 is Negative, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Positive sentiment for JGRW.

JGRW Peer Comparison

Comparison Results
Name
Price
Price Target
AUM
Expense Ratio
Overall Rating
$89.15M0.57%
74
Outperform
$99.66M0.55%
74
Outperform
$80.60M0.67%
71
Outperform
$66.87M0.85%
58
Neutral
$61.39M0.60%
72
Outperform
$43.43M0.50%
73
Outperform
Performance Comparison
Ticker
Company Name
Price
Change
% Change
JGRW
Jensen Quality Growth ETF
27.33
0.91
3.44%
GROZ
Zacks Focus Growth ETF
TSEL
Touchstone Sands Capital US Select Growth ETF
HYP
Golden Eagle Dynamic Hypergrowth ETF
SEMG
Suncoast Select Growth ETF
RILA
Indexperts Gorilla Aggressive Growth ETF
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
DisclaimerThis AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents
Advertisement