FTWO - ETF AI Analysis
Top Page
Strive FAANG 2.0 ETF (FTWO)
FTWO vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)
- AUM
- 76.07M
- Region
- North America
- Expense Ratio
- 0.49%
- Beta
- 0.75
- Issuer
- Strive
- Inception Date
- Aug 31, 2023
- Dividend Yield
- 0.94%
- Asset Class
- Equity
- Index Tracked
- Bloomberg FAANG 2.0 Select Index - Benchmark TR Gross
FTWO Summary
FTWO, the Strive FAANG 2.0 ETF, tracks the Bloomberg FAANG 2.0 Select Index and focuses on companies tied to a “new FAANG” theme, mainly in industrials, materials, and energy rather than classic internet tech. It holds well-known names like Exxon Mobil and Chevron, along with firms such as Deere and GE Aerospace that benefit from long-term trends in infrastructure, energy, and resources. An investor might choose this ETF for diversified exposure to companies supporting global growth and modernization. A key risk is that it can rise or fall with the broader stock market and is heavily exposed to cyclical sectors like energy and materials.
How much will it cost me?
The Strive FAANG 2.0 ETF (FTWO) has an expense ratio of 0.49%, which means you’ll pay $4.90 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is slightly higher than average for ETFs because it is actively managed, focusing on a dynamic portfolio of emerging and established tech leaders. Active management typically involves higher costs due to the research and adjustments made by fund managers.
What would affect this ETF?
The Strive FAANG 2.0 ETF could benefit from continued advancements in technology sectors like cloud computing and artificial intelligence, as well as strong performance from its top holdings in energy and industrials, such as Exxon Mobil and Deere. However, it may face challenges from rising interest rates, which can negatively impact growth-focused investments, and potential regulatory changes in North America that could affect key industries like energy and materials. Economic slowdowns or reduced demand for industrial and energy products could also pose risks to its performance.
FTWO Top 10 Holdings
FTWO is powered by a very real-economy mix, with heavy exposure to industrials, energy, and materials rather than classic Silicon Valley names. Deere and Freeport-McMoRan have been rising, giving the fund a solid lift from agriculture machinery and copper mining, while Exxon and Chevron add steady strength from the energy patch. On the flip side, nuclear-focused Cameco and GE Aerospace have been lagging lately, acting as a bit of a brake. With holdings largely rooted in North America, this ETF is a bet on hard-asset innovation more than pure software glamour.
| Name | Company Name | Weight % | Market Value | Market Cap | Yearly Gain | Overall Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 DE | Deere | 10.89% | $8.18M | $169.06B | 36.71% | 66Neutral |
 CEG | Constellation Energy Corporation | 9.44% | $7.10M | $93.25B | -30.04% | 68Neutral |
 XOM | Exxon Mobil | 7.97% | $5.99M | $733.07B | 57.82% | 74Outperform |
 GE | GE Aerospace | 4.62% | $3.47M | $322.97B | -0.93% | 72Outperform |
 CVX | Chevron | 4.60% | $3.46M | $443.30B | 46.11% | 71Outperform |
 NEM | Newmont Mining | 4.05% | $3.04M | $124.35B | 23.10% | 81Outperform |
 TSE:CCO | Cameco | 3.75% | $2.82M | CAD 49.60B | -6.12% | 71Outperform |
 RTX | RTX | 3.70% | $2.78M | $258.92B | 20.30% | 74Outperform |
 VYLR | Vylor Inc | 3.35% | $2.52M | $48.31B | 7.13% | ―― |
 FCX | Freeport-McMoRan | 3.24% | $2.44M | $100.16B | 63.24% | 67Neutral |
FTWO Technical Analysis
Price Trends
Market Momentum
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For FTWO, the sentiment is Negative. The current price of 44.88 is below the 20-day moving average (MA) of 45.15, below the 50-day MA of 46.18, and below the 200-day MA of 45.22, indicating a bearish trend. The MACD of -0.21 indicates Negative momentum. The RSI at 43.64 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 33.62 is Neutral, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Negative sentiment for FTWO.
FTWO Peer Comparison
Comparison Results
| Name | Price | Price Target | AUM | Expense Ratio | Overall Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FTWO | $44.88 | $50.00(11.40% Upside) | $76.07M | 0.49% | 68Neutral |
 IGV | $106.93 | $132.96(24.34% Upside) | $14.04B | 0.38% | 71Outperform |
 IGM | $160.74 | $209.82(30.53% Upside) | $10.92B | 0.37% | 75Outperform |
 NANR | $88.12 | $103.04(16.93% Upside) | $845.16M | 0.35% | 70Outperform |
 IGE | $65.98 | $74.71(13.24% Upside) | $826.73M | 0.37% | 72Outperform |
 PIPE | $29.54 | $33.93(14.87% Upside) | $64.59M | 0.75% | 66Neutral |
Performance Comparison
| Show on chart | Ticker | Company Name | Price | Change | % Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FTWO | Strive FAANG 2.0 ETF | 44.88 | 6.13 | 15.81% | |
| IGV | iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF | 106.93 | -6.56 | -5.78% | |
| IGM | iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF | 160.74 | 33.37 | 26.20% | |
| NANR | SPDR S&P North American Natural Resources ETF | 88.12 | 25.97 | 41.78% | |
| IGE | iShares North American Natural Resources ETF | 65.98 | 19.17 | 40.96% | |
| PIPE | Invesco SteelPath MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF | 29.54 | 7.00 | 31.04% |
This AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.