FTWO - ETF AI Analysis
Top Page
Strive FAANG 2.0 ETF (FTWO)
Rating:71Outperform
Price Target:―
Positive Factors
Strong Top Holdings
Several of the largest positions, including major industrial and energy names, have shown strong gains this year, helping support the fund’s overall results.
Diversified Across Cyclical Sectors
Holdings spread across industrials, materials, energy, utilities, and consumer defensive stocks help reduce the impact of weakness in any single sector.
Meaningful Asset Base
The fund’s sizable asset base suggests it has attracted a solid level of investor interest, which can support trading liquidity.
Negative Factors
Mixed Performance Among Top Holdings
Some key positions, such as Constellation Energy and a few resource names, have shown weak or negative performance, which has weighed on recent returns.
Sector Concentration Risk
Heavy exposure to just a few cyclical sectors like industrials, materials, and energy increases sensitivity to economic slowdowns and commodity price swings.
Relatively High Expense Ratio
The fund’s expense ratio is on the higher side for an ETF, which means more of the returns are used to cover fees instead of going to investors.
FTWO vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)
AUM77.82M
RegionNorth America
Expense Ratio0.49%
Beta0.80
IssuerStrive
Inception DateAug 31, 2023
Dividend Yield0.86%
Asset ClassEquity
Index TrackedBloomberg FAANG 2.0 Select Index - Benchmark TR Gross
Share Statistics
EPS (TTM)N/A
Shares OutstandingN/A
10 Day Avg. Volume3,923
30 Day Avg. Volume6,742
Financial Highlights & Ratios
PEG RatioN/A
Price to Book (P/B)N/A
Price to Sales (P/S)N/A
P/FCF RatioN/A
Enterprise Value/Market CapN/A
Enterprise Value/RevenueN/A
Enterprise Value/Gross ProfitN/A
Enterprise Value/EbitdaN/A
Forecast
1Y Price Target
54.02Price Target Upside― Downside
Rating ConsensusModerate Buy
Number of Analyst Covering52
EPS Forecast (FY)N/A
Revenue Forecast (FY)N/A
FTWO Summary
FTWO, the Strive FAANG 2.0 ETF, tracks the Bloomberg FAANG 2.0 Select Index and focuses on companies tied to a “new FAANG” theme, mainly in industrials, materials, and energy rather than classic internet tech. It holds well-known names like Exxon Mobil and Chevron, along with firms such as Deere and GE Aerospace that benefit from long-term trends in infrastructure, energy, and resources. An investor might choose this ETF for diversified exposure to companies supporting global growth and modernization. A key risk is that it can rise or fall with the broader stock market and is heavily exposed to cyclical sectors like energy and materials.
How much will it cost me?The Strive FAANG 2.0 ETF (FTWO) has an expense ratio of 0.49%, which means you’ll pay $4.90 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is slightly higher than average for ETFs because it is actively managed, focusing on a dynamic portfolio of emerging and established tech leaders. Active management typically involves higher costs due to the research and adjustments made by fund managers.
What would affect this ETF?The Strive FAANG 2.0 ETF could benefit from continued advancements in technology sectors like cloud computing and artificial intelligence, as well as strong performance from its top holdings in energy and industrials, such as Exxon Mobil and Deere. However, it may face challenges from rising interest rates, which can negatively impact growth-focused investments, and potential regulatory changes in North America that could affect key industries like energy and materials. Economic slowdowns or reduced demand for industrial and energy products could also pose risks to its performance.
FTWO Top 10 Holdings
FTWO may wear a tech-themed label, but its story is really about old-economy powerhouses driving the show. Industrials like Deere and GE Aerospace have been steady to mixed, with Deere recently losing a bit of steam, while defense name RTX has been quietly rising. The real spark comes from materials and energy: Freeport-McMoRan and Newmont are climbing strongly, and oil majors Exxon and Chevron are helping to pull the fund higher. With holdings largely in North America and clustered in energy, mining, and industrials, this ETF is more “hard-hat innovation” than classic Silicon Valley growth.
Name | Company Name | Weight % | Market Value | Market Cap | Yearly Gain | Overall Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Deere | 10.05% | $7.89M | $169.95B | 31.69% | 66 Neutral | |
| Constellation Energy Corporation | 8.25% | $6.48M | $98.05B | -10.14% | 68 Neutral | |
| Exxon Mobil | 6.82% | $5.35M | $644.38B | 37.12% | 74 Outperform | |
| GE Aerospace | 5.10% | $4.00M | $355.45B | 24.48% | 72 Outperform | |
| Newmont Mining | 4.69% | $3.68M | $134.85B | 72.02% | 81 Outperform | |
| Cameco | 4.33% | $3.40M | C$60.59B | 29.23% | 71 Outperform | |
| RTX | 4.08% | $3.20M | $285.33B | 33.49% | 74 Outperform | |
| Chevron | 3.89% | $3.06M | $398.83B | 25.69% | 71 Outperform | |
| Freeport-McMoRan | 3.72% | $2.92M | $109.78B | 72.18% | 67 Neutral | |
| Agnico Eagle | 3.57% | $2.81M | $105.03B | 43.06% | 80 Outperform |
FTWO Technical Analysis
Positive
―
Price Trends
44.74
Positive
44.94
Positive
44.28
Positive
Market Momentum
0.79
Positive
61.07
Neutral
36.43
Neutral
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For FTWO, the sentiment is Positive. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 46.71, equal to the 50-day MA of 44.74, and equal to the 200-day MA of 44.28, indicating a bullish trend. The MACD of 0.79 indicates Positive momentum. The RSI at 61.07 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 36.43 is Neutral, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Positive sentiment for FTWO.
FTWO Peer Comparison
Comparison Results
Performance Comparison
FTWO
Strive FAANG 2.0 ETF
47.21
10.15
27.39%
IGV
iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF
―
―
―
IGM
iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF
―
―
―
NANR
SPDR S&P North American Natural Resources ETF
―
―
―
IGE
iShares North American Natural Resources ETF
―
―
―
PIPE
Invesco SteelPath MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF
―
―
―
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
DisclaimerThis AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents