TipRanks
Advertisement

FITZ - ETF AI Analysis

Compare

Top Page

FITZ

Fitz-Gerald Must Have Portfolio ETF (FITZ)

Rating:70Outperform
Price Target:―
FITZ’s rating suggests it is a solid, quality ETF, largely driven by strong, innovative companies like Microsoft, Apple, Nvidia, and AMD, which benefit from powerful trends in cloud computing, AI, and consumer technology. These holdings provide growth potential but come with risks from high valuations and some mixed technical signals, while positions like Chevron and Eli Lilly add diversification yet introduce challenges such as bearish momentum, leverage, and cash flow concerns. The main risk factor is the fund’s heavy tilt toward high-growth, AI-focused tech names, which can make performance more sensitive to market swings and sentiment around expensive, fast-growing stocks.
Positive Factors
Strong Recent Performance
The ETF has shown solid gains over the past three months and year-to-date, indicating positive recent momentum.
Leading Technology Holdings
Several major technology names in the top holdings, such as Nvidia, Microsoft, Apple, and CrowdStrike, have delivered strong performance, helping drive the fund’s returns.
Broad Sector Mix
Exposure across technology, industrials, health care, consumer, energy, financials, and real estate helps spread risk across different parts of the economy.
Negative Factors
High Expense Ratio
The fund’s expense ratio is relatively high for an ETF, which means more of your returns are used to cover fees each year.
Heavy U.S. Concentration
With almost all assets invested in U.S. companies, the ETF offers little geographic diversification and is highly tied to the U.S. market.
Concentration in a Few Big Tech Names
A significant portion of the portfolio is in a small group of large technology stocks, so any weakness in these companies could have an outsized impact on the fund.

FITZ vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)

FITZ Summary

FITZ, the Fitz-Gerald Must Have Portfolio ETF, is an actively managed fund that focuses on five big long-term themes: digital technology, defense and security, new tech spreading into more industries, modern delivery and logistics, and companies benefiting from major economic shifts. It holds a concentrated mix of U.S. stocks, including well-known names like Apple, Microsoft, Nvidia, Tesla, and Walmart. Someone might invest in FITZ to seek long-term growth from powerful trends rather than the overall market. However, because it is focused and heavily tilted toward technology and similar sectors, its price can swing more than a broad, diversified market fund.
How much will it cost me?This ETF has an expense ratio of 0.75%, which means you’ll pay about $7.50 per year for every $1,000 you invest. That’s higher than the average ETF because it’s actively managed and uses research-driven stock picking rather than simply tracking a broad market index.
What would affect this ETF?Because FITZ is heavily invested in technology, defense, and industrial companies around the world, it could benefit from long-term growth in areas like artificial intelligence, cloud computing, cybersecurity, and increased government spending on defense and supply chain reshoring. On the other hand, its concentrated positions in big names like Nvidia, Apple, Tesla, and JPMorgan mean it could be hurt by higher interest rates, tighter regulations on tech or defense, economic slowdowns that reduce consumer and business spending, or setbacks in these specific companies.

FITZ Top 10 Holdings

FITZ is leaning hard into U.S. tech and AI, with Nvidia, AMD, Palantir, CrowdStrike, and Microsoft doing most of the heavy lifting as their shares keep rising on enthusiasm for data centers, cybersecurity, and automation. Apple is still a steady engine, though it’s no longer the only star of the show. On the flip side, Tesla is dragging the fund, with more mixed sentiment around EV demand and competition. Chevron and JPMorgan add an energy and financial ballast, but this is clearly a tech‑driven, globally themed portfolio with a strong U.S. tilt.
Name
Company Name
Weight %
Market Value
Market Cap
Yearly Gain
Overall Rating
Palantir Technologies6.63%$6.27M$455.79B4.82%
74
Outperform
CrowdStrike Holdings5.83%$5.52M$258.16B112.30%
67
Neutral
Nvidia5.38%$5.09M$5.42T25.85%
76
Outperform
Advanced Micro Devices5.33%$5.04M$1.03T276.72%
73
Outperform
Apple5.15%$4.88M$4.98T33.00%
79
Outperform
Tesla4.92%$4.65M$1.47T-19.35%
73
Outperform
JPMorgan Chase4.69%$4.43M$911.92B6.62%
72
Outperform
Chevron4.27%$4.04M$403.95B32.20%
71
Outperform
Eli Lilly & Co4.09%$3.87M$1.11T63.08%
72
Outperform
Microsoft4.02%$3.81M$3.83T-1.04%
79
Outperform

FITZ Technical Analysis

Technical Analysis Sentiment
Positive
Last Price―
Price Trends
50DMA
25.20
Positive
100DMA
200DMA
Market Momentum
MACD
0.20
Negative
RSI
56.63
Neutral
STOCH
64.06
Neutral
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For FITZ, the sentiment is Positive. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 25.48, equal to the 50-day MA of 25.20, and equal to the 200-day MA of ―, indicating a neutral trend. The MACD of 0.20 indicates Negative momentum. The RSI at 56.63 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 64.06 is Neutral, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Positive sentiment for FITZ.

FITZ Peer Comparison

Comparison Results
Name
Price
Price Target
AUM
Expense Ratio
Overall Rating
――$95.34M0.75%
70
Outperform
――$97.17M0.98%
69
Neutral
――$56.11M1.00%
55
Neutral
――$46.06M0.75%
71
Outperform
――$11.79M1.01%
71
Outperform
――$652.60K0.79%
75
Outperform
Performance Comparison
Ticker
Company Name
Price
Change
% Change
FITZ
Fitz-Gerald Must Have Portfolio ETF
25.72
0.39
1.54%
FFND
Future Fund Active ETF
―
―
―
NXTE
AXS Green Alpha ETF
―
―
―
DARP
Grizzle Growth Etf
―
―
―
FIZY
Fitz-Gerald Must Have Portfolio and Options Overlay ETF
―
―
―
GAIQ
Guinness Atkinson Global Innovators Fund: ETF Class Shares
―
―
―
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
DisclaimerThis AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents
Advertisement