XRLV - ETF AI Analysis
Top Page
Invesco S&P 500 ex-Rate Sensitive Low Volatility ETF (XRLV)
Rating:70Outperform
Price Target:―
Positive Factors
Stable, Defensive Top Holdings
Many of the largest positions are well-known defensive companies with generally steady recent performance, which can help smooth out returns.
Low Volatility, Rate-Sensitive Focus
The strategy targets lower-volatility stocks and avoids the most interest-rate-sensitive names, which may reduce sharp swings compared with the broader market.
Broad Sector Diversification
The fund spreads its assets across multiple sectors such as utilities, financials, consumer defensive, real estate, health care, and others, helping reduce reliance on any single industry.
Negative Factors
Small Asset Base
The ETF manages a relatively modest amount of money, which can sometimes mean lower trading volume and wider bid-ask spreads for investors.
Heavy Tilt to Defensive Sectors
Large weights in utilities, consumer defensive, and real estate may cause the fund to lag if more growth-oriented or cyclical sectors lead the market.
Concentrated U.S. Exposure
With almost all assets invested in U.S. companies, the fund offers little geographic diversification outside the United States.
XRLV vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)
AUM29.25M
RegionNorth America
Expense Ratio0.25%
Beta0.35
IssuerInvesco
Inception DateApr 09, 2015
Dividend Yield2.03%
Asset ClassEquity
Index TrackedS&P 500 Low Volatility Rate Response Index
Share Statistics
EPS (TTM)N/A
Shares OutstandingN/A
10 Day Avg. Volume4,323
30 Day Avg. Volume2,453
Financial Highlights & Ratios
PEG RatioN/A
Price to Book (P/B)N/A
Price to Sales (P/S)N/A
P/FCF RatioN/A
Enterprise Value/Market CapN/A
Enterprise Value/RevenueN/A
Enterprise Value/Gross ProfitN/A
Enterprise Value/EbitdaN/A
Forecast
1Y Price Target
61.20Price Target Upside― Downside
Rating ConsensusModerate Buy
Number of Analyst Covering100
EPS Forecast (FY)N/A
Revenue Forecast (FY)N/A
XRLV Summary
XRLV is an ETF that follows the S&P 500 Low Volatility Rate Response Index, focusing on large U.S. companies that tend to have smaller price swings and are less sensitive to interest rate changes. It holds well-known names like Coca-Cola and Johnson & Johnson, along with utilities, financials, and other steady businesses. Someone might consider this ETF if they want stock market exposure with a smoother ride than the overall market and a focus on stability over big jumps. A key risk is that it can still lose value and will go up and down with the stock market over time.
How much will it cost me?The expense ratio for the Invesco S&P 500 ex-Rate Sensitive Low Volatility ETF (XRLV) is 0.25%, meaning you’ll pay $2.50 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is slightly higher than average for ETFs because it is actively managed to focus on minimizing interest rate sensitivity and maintaining low volatility.
What would affect this ETF?The XRLV ETF, which focuses on low-volatility U.S. large-cap stocks while avoiding rate-sensitive sectors, could benefit from stable economic conditions and increased investor demand for defensive sectors like Utilities and Consumer Defensive. However, rising interest rates or regulatory changes impacting key sectors such as Utilities and Real Estate may negatively affect its performance. Its focus on minimizing interest rate sensitivity makes it appealing during periods of economic uncertainty but could limit upside potential in a strong growth environment.
XRLV Top 10 Holdings
XRLV is leaning into steady, U.S.-based defensive names, with utilities, consumer staples, and real estate quietly steering the ship. Johnson & Johnson and Coca-Cola are among the fund’s key engines, both rising on solid earnings and dependable cash flows. Linde has also been climbing, adding a bit of industrial strength, while Realty Income and CenterPoint Energy are recovering but still feel a bit heavy given lingering bearish signals. Overall, the ETF is diversified across low-volatility blue chips, with no single stock dominating the story.
Name | Company Name | Weight % | Market Value | Market Cap | Yearly Gain | Overall Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Johnson & Johnson | 1.30% | $411.09K | $593.51B | 48.28% | 78 Outperform | |
| Coca-Cola | 1.26% | $397.37K | $347.15B | 12.91% | 75 Outperform | |
| Realty Income | 1.26% | $396.73K | $61.19B | 18.28% | 70 Outperform | |
| Evergy | 1.26% | $396.21K | $19.00B | 19.90% | 62 Neutral | |
| Waste Management | 1.24% | $391.11K | $92.60B | -0.51% | 76 Outperform | |
| Pinnacle West Capital | 1.22% | $385.32K | $11.98B | 7.40% | 65 Neutral | |
| McDonald's | 1.19% | $375.11K | $237.18B | 7.19% | 65 Neutral | |
| Linde | 1.19% | $373.67K | $235.34B | 7.81% | 66 Neutral | |
| TJX Companies | 1.18% | $373.42K | $175.08B | 28.49% | 79 Outperform | |
| Centerpoint Energy | 1.18% | $372.21K | $27.94B | 25.07% | 63 Neutral |
XRLV Technical Analysis
Positive
―
Price Trends
55.05
Positive
54.56
Positive
54.49
Positive
Market Momentum
0.69
Negative
70.45
Negative
54.04
Neutral
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For XRLV, the sentiment is Positive. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 56.42, equal to the 50-day MA of 55.05, and equal to the 200-day MA of 54.49, indicating a bullish trend. The MACD of 0.69 indicates Negative momentum. The RSI at 70.45 is Negative, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 54.04 is Neutral, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Positive sentiment for XRLV.
XRLV Peer Comparison
Comparison Results
Performance Comparison
XRLV
Invesco S&P 500 ex-Rate Sensitive Low Volatility ETF
57.25
3.11
5.74%
BCUS
Bancreek U.S. Large Cap ETF
―
―
―
UPSD
Aptus Large Cap Upside ETF
―
―
―
LVDS
JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Large Value ETF
―
―
―
RWLC
Rayliant Quantitative Developed Market Equity ETF
―
―
―
ACEP
ARS Core Equity Portfolio ETF
―
―
―
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
DisclaimerThis AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents