tiprankstipranks
Advertisement

URAN - ETF AI Analysis

Compare

Top Page

URAN

Themes Uranium & Nuclear ETF (URAN)

Rating:47Neutral
Price Target:
URAN, the Themes Uranium & Nuclear ETF, has a mixed overall rating that reflects both strong established utilities and nuclear leaders alongside more speculative nuclear technology names. High-quality holdings like Constellation Energy and Cameco support the fund’s rating with solid financial performance, positive earnings sentiment, and strategic positioning in nuclear energy, while weaker positions such as Oklo, Denison Mines, and NuScale Power, which face profitability, cash flow, and valuation challenges, weigh on the score. The main risk factor is the fund’s concentration in the uranium and nuclear sector, where several companies are unprofitable or financially stressed, making the ETF more sensitive to industry-specific setbacks.
Positive Factors
Focused Uranium & Nuclear Theme
The ETF targets companies tied to uranium and nuclear power, giving investors direct exposure to a specific energy theme that may benefit from long-term demand for low-carbon power.
Balanced Mix of Energy and Utilities
Holdings are spread mainly across energy and utilities companies, which can provide a mix of growth potential from uranium producers and more stable cash flows from power utilities.
Global Geographic Exposure
The fund invests across several countries including the U.S., Canada, Australia, the UK, and parts of Asia and Europe, reducing reliance on any single market.
Negative Factors
Recent Weak Performance
The ETF has shown weak returns over the past month, three months, and year to date, indicating it has been under pressure in the current market environment.
Top Holding Underperformance
The largest position, Constellation Energy, has delivered weak results so far this year, which can drag on the overall fund given its sizable weight.
High Thematic and Sector Concentration
The portfolio is heavily concentrated in the uranium and nuclear theme and in the energy and utilities sectors, increasing sensitivity to downturns or regulatory changes affecting this niche area.

URAN vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)

URAN Summary

Themes Uranium & Nuclear ETF (URAN) is a fund that follows the BITA Global Uranium and Nuclear Select Index, focusing on companies tied to nuclear power and uranium. It holds firms involved in uranium mining, nuclear energy production, and related infrastructure. Well-known holdings include Constellation Energy and Duke Energy, along with specialized uranium miners like NexGen Energy. Someone might invest in URAN to tap into potential long-term growth from cleaner energy and to get diversified exposure to nuclear-related companies worldwide. A key risk is that it’s concentrated in one niche sector, so its price can rise or fall sharply with changes in energy and uranium markets.
How much will it cost me?The Themes Uranium & Nuclear ETF (URAN) has an expense ratio of 0.35%, which means you’ll pay $3.50 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is slightly higher than average for ETFs because it is a sector-focused fund, which typically involves more specialized management compared to broad, passively managed funds.
What would affect this ETF?The Themes Uranium & Nuclear ETF (URAN) could benefit from the global push for cleaner energy and carbon neutrality, as nuclear energy is increasingly recognized as a reliable and sustainable solution. However, potential negative factors include regulatory challenges, geopolitical risks affecting uranium mining, and competition from other renewable energy sources like wind and solar. Its global exposure and focus on energy, utilities, and industrial sectors make it sensitive to shifts in energy policies and economic conditions.

URAN Top 10 Holdings

URAN is essentially a bet on nuclear power, with U.S. utilities like Constellation Energy and Duke Energy providing the more stable backbone of the fund. Constellation has been rising recently, helping offset earlier weakness, while Duke and American Electric Power are steady contributors rather than big swing factors. The real drama comes from uranium miners such as NexGen Energy and Denison Mines, where performance has been mixed to lagging and can tug the fund lower when sentiment turns. With a global spread of holdings but a tight focus on nuclear and uranium, this ETF lives and dies by the nuclear energy story.
Name
Company Name
Weight %
Market Value
Market Cap
Yearly Gain
Overall Rating
Constellation Energy Corporation10.78%$3.19M$94.35B-22.90%
68
Neutral
4.28%$1.27M
Duke Energy4.14%$1.23M$97.78B2.05%
70
Outperform
American Electric Power4.03%$1.19M$69.60B12.56%
69
Neutral
Public Service Enterprise3.74%$1.11M$38.21B-13.81%
66
Neutral
NexGen Energy3.26%$964.83KC$8.49B41.20%
53
Neutral
Yellow Cake plc3.10%$919.60K£1.38B13.82%
Denison Mines3.07%$908.22KC$3.57B37.74%
47
Neutral
PG&E2.99%$884.41K$46.58B23.09%
69
Neutral
Cameco2.81%$832.79KC$52.69B18.44%
71
Outperform

URAN Technical Analysis

Technical Analysis Sentiment
Negative
Last Price
Price Trends
50DMA
39.37
Negative
100DMA
42.28
Negative
200DMA
44.15
Negative
Market Momentum
MACD
-0.85
Negative
RSI
41.84
Neutral
STOCH
26.54
Neutral
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For URAN, the sentiment is Negative. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 37.14, equal to the 50-day MA of 39.37, and equal to the 200-day MA of 44.15, indicating a bearish trend. The MACD of -0.85 indicates Negative momentum. The RSI at 41.84 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 26.54 is Neutral, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Negative sentiment for URAN.

URAN Peer Comparison

Comparison Results
Name
Price
Price Target
AUM
Expense Ratio
Overall Rating
$29.62M0.35%
47
Neutral
$99.91M1.00%
66
Neutral
$99.21M0.55%
65
Neutral
$26.12M0.70%
58
Neutral
$15.74M0.65%
51
Neutral
$1.84M0.75%
57
Neutral
Performance Comparison
Ticker
Company Name
Price
Change
% Change
URAN
Themes Uranium & Nuclear ETF
36.38
-1.25
-3.32%
FFND
Future Fund Active ETF
EVX
VanEck Environmental Services ETF
RCTR
First Trust Bloomberg Nuclear Power ETF
SMRF
ALPS Nautilus SMR, Nuclear & Technology ETF
TNUK
Tortoise Nuclear Renaissance ETF
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
DisclaimerThis AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents
Advertisement