tiprankstipranks
Advertisement

RCTR - ETF AI Analysis

Compare

Top Page

RCTR

First Trust Bloomberg Nuclear Power ETF (RCTR)

Rating:58Neutral
Price Target:
RCTR, the First Trust Bloomberg Nuclear Power ETF, has a solid overall rating driven by strong, diversified holdings in major energy and industrial names like Hitachi and BHP, which bring robust financial performance and growth prospects to the portfolio. However, several key utilities and energy companies in the fund, such as Entergy, Southern Co, and Talen Energy, face challenges like high leverage, cash flow issues, and bearish price momentum that weigh on the rating. The main risk factor is the fund’s concentration in nuclear and broader power-related businesses, where debt levels, valuation concerns, and sector-specific headwinds can increase volatility.
Positive Factors
Global Nuclear Power Focus
The fund targets companies tied to nuclear power across several countries, giving investors focused exposure to this specific energy theme.
Broad Country Diversification
Holdings spread across the U.S., Japan, Canada, the UK, Australia, and other markets help reduce the impact of problems in any single country.
Multiple Sector Exposure
Exposure to utilities, industrials, energy, and materials companies provides a mix of business types within the nuclear power ecosystem.
Negative Factors
High Expense Ratio
The fund’s relatively high fee means more of the investment return is used to cover costs instead of staying in investors’ pockets.
Recent Weak Performance
The ETF has shown weak short-term results, with recent one-month and three-month returns moving lower.
Top Holdings Under Pressure
Several of the largest positions have been lagging this year, which can drag on the overall fund’s performance.

RCTR vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)

RCTR Summary

The First Trust Bloomberg Nuclear Power ETF (RCTR) is a fund that follows the Bloomberg Nuclear Power Index, focusing on companies involved in nuclear energy around the world. It holds firms that generate nuclear power, build reactors, or supply related equipment and materials. Well-known names in the fund include Constellation Energy and Duke Energy. Someone might invest in RCTR to bet on the long-term growth of nuclear power as a cleaner energy source and to gain diversification across utilities and industrial companies. A key risk is that it is heavily focused on the nuclear sector, so its price can swing more than the broader stock market.
How much will it cost me?The First Trust Bloomberg Nuclear Power ETF (RCTR) has an expense ratio of 0.7%, which means you’ll pay $7 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is higher than average because the fund is actively managed and focuses on a specific sector, requiring more research and specialized management.
What would affect this ETF?The First Trust Bloomberg Nuclear Power ETF (RCTR) could benefit from growing global interest in clean energy solutions, as nuclear power is increasingly seen as a reliable and sustainable alternative to fossil fuels. However, the ETF may face challenges from regulatory hurdles, public concerns over nuclear safety, or competition from other renewable energy sources like wind and solar. Its exposure to utilities and industrial sectors, along with top holdings like Oklo Inc and Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, positions it to capitalize on innovation in nuclear technology, but economic downturns or geopolitical tensions could negatively impact its performance.

RCTR Top 10 Holdings

RCTR is a pure play on nuclear power, with a heavy tilt toward utilities and industrials across a global mix of U.S. names like Constellation, Entergy, Duke, and Southern, plus Japanese heavyweights Hitachi and Mitsubishi Heavy Industries. Entergy, Duke, Southern, BHP, and GE Vernova are doing much of the heavy lifting, with rising or steady share prices that help power the fund. In contrast, Constellation, Vistra, and especially Talen look more mixed or lagging, occasionally acting like sand in the gears of this otherwise forward-moving nuclear theme.
Name
Company Name
Weight %
Market Value
Market Cap
Yearly Gain
Overall Rating
Hitachi,Ltd.5.29%$1.33M¥22.42T7.15%
77
Outperform
Constellation Energy Corporation5.20%$1.30M$92.63B-24.23%
68
Neutral
Duke Energy4.80%$1.20M$100.63B3.81%
70
Outperform
BHP Group Ltd4.77%$1.20MAU$305.76B66.36%
68
Neutral
Southern Co4.73%$1.19M$108.28B-0.15%
68
Neutral
Mitsubishi Heavy Industries4.66%$1.17M¥12.57T-0.62%
60
Neutral
Vistra Corp4.56%$1.14M$48.15B-28.73%
65
Neutral
Entergy4.52%$1.13M$49.36B19.46%
66
Neutral
Rolls-Royce Holdings4.40%$1.10M£115.00B40.07%
71
Outperform
Talen Energy Corp4.18%$1.05M$14.35B-11.93%
60
Neutral

RCTR Technical Analysis

Technical Analysis Sentiment
Negative
Last Price
Price Trends
50DMA
33.88
Negative
100DMA
35.17
Negative
200DMA
35.00
Negative
Market Momentum
MACD
RSI
STOCH
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For RCTR, the sentiment is Negative. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 32.80, equal to the 50-day MA of 33.88, and equal to the 200-day MA of 35.00, indicating a bearish trend. The MACD of ― indicates undefined momentum. The RSI at ― is undefined, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of ― is undefined, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Negative sentiment for RCTR.

RCTR Peer Comparison

Comparison Results
Name
Price
Price Target
AUM
Expense Ratio
Overall Rating
$26.12M0.70%
58
Neutral
$98.18M1.00%
66
Neutral
$96.15M0.50%
71
Outperform
$28.87M0.35%
47
Neutral
$14.70M0.65%
52
Neutral
$1.78M0.75%
57
Neutral
Performance Comparison
Ticker
Company Name
Price
Change
% Change
RCTR
First Trust Bloomberg Nuclear Power ETF
32.55
2.27
7.50%
FFND
Future Fund Active ETF
FDCF
Fidelity Disruptive Communications ETF
URAN
Themes Uranium & Nuclear ETF
SMRF
ALPS Nautilus SMR, Nuclear & Technology ETF
TNUK
Tortoise Nuclear Renaissance ETF
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
DisclaimerThis AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents
Advertisement