TipRanks
Advertisement

RCTR - ETF AI Analysis

Compare

Top Page

RCTR

First Trust Bloomberg Nuclear Power ETF (RCTR)

Rating:56Neutral
Price Target:
RCTR, the First Trust Bloomberg Nuclear Power ETF, has a mid-range overall rating driven by solid but mixed underlying holdings in the nuclear and industrial energy space. Strong contributors like Hitachi and Cameco support the fund with robust financial performance, positive earnings outlooks, and strategic positioning in nuclear power, while weaker aspects such as high leverage and cash flow challenges at names like Vistra and Entergy, along with overvaluation and bearish technical signals across several holdings, temper the fund’s appeal. The main risk factor is the fund’s concentration in nuclear and related industrial/utility companies, which exposes investors to sector-specific and valuation-related volatility.
Positive Factors
Global Nuclear Power Focus
The fund targets companies tied to nuclear power across several countries, giving investors focused exposure to this specific energy theme.
Broad Country Diversification
Holdings spread across the U.S., Japan, Canada, the UK, Australia, and other markets help reduce the impact of problems in any single country.
Multiple Sector Exposure
Exposure to utilities, industrials, energy, and materials companies provides a mix of business types within the nuclear power ecosystem.
Negative Factors
High Expense Ratio
The fund’s relatively high fee means more of the investment return is used to cover costs instead of staying in investors’ pockets.
Recent Weak Performance
The ETF has shown weak short-term results, with recent one-month and three-month returns moving lower.
Top Holdings Under Pressure
Several of the largest positions have been lagging this year, which can drag on the overall fund’s performance.

RCTR vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)

RCTR Summary

The First Trust Bloomberg Nuclear Power ETF (RCTR) is a fund that follows the Bloomberg Nuclear Power Index, focusing on companies involved in nuclear energy around the world. It holds firms that generate nuclear power, build reactors, or supply related equipment and materials. Well-known names in the fund include Constellation Energy and Duke Energy. Someone might invest in RCTR to bet on the long-term growth of nuclear power as a cleaner energy source and to gain diversification across utilities and industrial companies. A key risk is that it is heavily focused on the nuclear sector, so its price can swing more than the broader stock market.
How much will it cost me?The First Trust Bloomberg Nuclear Power ETF (RCTR) has an expense ratio of 0.7%, which means you’ll pay $7 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is higher than average because the fund is actively managed and focuses on a specific sector, requiring more research and specialized management.
What would affect this ETF?The First Trust Bloomberg Nuclear Power ETF (RCTR) could benefit from growing global interest in clean energy solutions, as nuclear power is increasingly seen as a reliable and sustainable alternative to fossil fuels. However, the ETF may face challenges from regulatory hurdles, public concerns over nuclear safety, or competition from other renewable energy sources like wind and solar. Its exposure to utilities and industrial sectors, along with top holdings like Oklo Inc and Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, positions it to capitalize on innovation in nuclear technology, but economic downturns or geopolitical tensions could negatively impact its performance.

RCTR Top 10 Holdings

This nuclear-focused ETF is powered by a global mix of utilities and industrial heavyweights, with Japan’s Hitachi and Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, plus UK-based Rolls-Royce, doing much of the heavy lifting as their shares have been steadily rising. Materials giant BHP has also been a strong tailwind, reflecting renewed enthusiasm for uranium and related commodities. On the flip side, U.S. utilities like Duke Energy and Entergy have been more sluggish, while Vistra is clearly dragging the fund. Overall, the story here is concentrated, global nuclear infrastructure with a few U.S. utilities losing steam.
Name
Company Name
Weight %
Market Value
Market Cap
Yearly Gain
Overall Rating
5.39%$1.63M
Constellation Energy Corporation5.34%$1.62M$100.89B-11.97%
68
Neutral
Hitachi,Ltd.5.29%$1.60M¥23.51T24.11%
77
Outperform
BHP Group Ltd4.67%$1.42MAU$309.43B70.67%
68
Neutral
Mitsubishi Heavy Industries4.60%$1.39M¥12.45T-6.58%
60
Neutral
Cameco4.41%$1.34MC$58.37B23.77%
71
Outperform
Vistra Corp4.41%$1.34M$49.80B-29.24%
65
Neutral
Rolls-Royce Holdings4.40%$1.33M£120.89B27.13%
71
Outperform
Duke Energy4.14%$1.25M$93.11B-2.07%
70
Outperform
Entergy4.11%$1.24M$50.32B16.66%
66
Neutral

RCTR Technical Analysis

Technical Analysis Sentiment
Negative
Last Price
Price Trends
50DMA
33.55
Negative
100DMA
34.58
Negative
200DMA
34.96
Negative
Market Momentum
MACD
0.02
Positive
RSI
40.59
Neutral
STOCH
17.83
Positive
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For RCTR, the sentiment is Negative. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 33.98, equal to the 50-day MA of 33.55, and equal to the 200-day MA of 34.96, indicating a bearish trend. The MACD of 0.02 indicates Positive momentum. The RSI at 40.59 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 17.83 is Positive, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Negative sentiment for RCTR.

RCTR Peer Comparison

Comparison Results
Name
Price
Price Target
AUM
Expense Ratio
Overall Rating
$30.34M0.70%
56
Neutral
$99.02M0.47%
68
Neutral
$97.23M0.55%
64
Neutral
$27.38M0.35%
47
Neutral
$16.80M0.65%
50
Neutral
$1.43M0.75%
55
Neutral
Performance Comparison
Ticker
Company Name
Price
Change
% Change
RCTR
First Trust Bloomberg Nuclear Power ETF
32.89
1.23
3.89%
IBOT
Vaneck Robotics ETF
EVX
VanEck Environmental Services ETF
URAN
Themes Uranium & Nuclear ETF
SMRF
ALPS Nautilus SMR, Nuclear & Technology ETF
TNUK
Tortoise Nuclear Renaissance ETF
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
DisclaimerThis AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents
Advertisement