tiprankstipranks
Advertisement

SIMS - ETF AI Analysis

Compare

Top Page

SIMS

SPDR S&P Kensho Intelligent Structures ETF (SIMS)

Rating:64Neutral
Price Target:
SIMS, the SPDR S&P Kensho Intelligent Structures ETF, has a solid but not top-tier rating, suggesting a generally positive outlook with some notable risks. Strong contributors like Xylem, Veralto, and Tetra Tech support the fund through robust financial performance, positive earnings calls, and strategic initiatives such as share buybacks and raised guidance. However, weaker names like Silicon Labs and Arlo, which face declining or mixed financial trends, bearish technical signals, and valuation concerns, along with pockets of overvaluation and mixed momentum across several holdings, introduce risk that tempers the overall rating.
Positive Factors
Broad Sector Mix
The fund spreads its investments across several sectors like industrials, technology, energy, and utilities, which can help reduce the impact if one industry struggles.
Strong Recent Year-To-Date Result
The ETF has delivered a solid gain so far this year, showing that its strategy has recently been working for investors overall.
Targeted Theme in Intelligent Infrastructure
The fund focuses on companies tied to intelligent structures and related technologies, giving investors concentrated exposure to a specific long-term growth theme.
Negative Factors
Weak Short-Term Performance
The ETF has slipped over the past one and three months, which may signal near-term volatility or pressure on its holdings.
Many Top Holdings Are Lagging
Several of the largest positions have shown weak performance this year, which can drag on the fund’s overall returns even though one holding has been very strong.
High Cost for a Passive ETF
The expense ratio is on the higher side compared with many index ETFs, meaning more of the fund’s returns are used to cover fees.

SIMS vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)

SIMS Summary

The SPDR S&P Kensho Intelligent Structures ETF (SIMS) is a fund that follows the S&P Kensho Intelligent Infrastructure Index, focusing on companies using technology to modernize infrastructure. It holds businesses involved in smart buildings, advanced construction, and efficient water and energy systems. Well-known names in the fund include Xylem and Veralto Corporation. An investor might choose SIMS to seek long-term growth from trends like smarter cities and more sustainable infrastructure, while still spreading money across many companies. A key risk is that it’s heavily tied to industrial and tech-related infrastructure, so its price can rise and fall sharply with those sectors.
How much will it cost me?The SPDR S&P Kensho Intelligent Structures ETF (SIMS) has an expense ratio of 0.45%, meaning you’ll pay $4.50 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is slightly higher than average because the fund is actively managed to focus on a specific niche of innovative infrastructure companies. The higher cost reflects the specialized research and management involved in maintaining this thematic portfolio.
What would affect this ETF?The SIMS ETF could benefit from increased government spending on infrastructure modernization and the growing adoption of technologies like artificial intelligence and robotics in construction and energy systems. However, it may face challenges from rising interest rates, which can increase borrowing costs for infrastructure projects, and potential regulatory hurdles affecting technology and energy sectors. Its focus on U.S.-based companies in industries like Industrials and Technology makes it sensitive to domestic economic conditions and innovation trends.

SIMS Top 10 Holdings

SIMS is leaning heavily into smart infrastructure, with industrial and tech names steering the ship. Tetra Tech, Itron, and Alarm are rising and helping drive recent gains, reflecting steady demand for intelligent building and utility solutions. Johnson Controls is also pulling its weight, adding stability as a core smart-building player. On the flip side, Arlo Technologies and Xylem are lagging, acting as a bit of a brake on performance, while Badger Meter has been mixed. Overall, it’s a U.S.-centric bet on the future of connected, data-driven infrastructure.
Name
Company Name
Weight %
Market Value
Market Cap
Yearly Gain
Overall Rating
Tetra Tech3.60%$298.59K$9.19B-0.50%
73
Outperform
Alarm3.31%$274.57K$2.77B-0.82%
72
Outperform
Itron3.23%$267.83K$4.25B-19.46%
70
Outperform
Veralto Corporation3.19%$264.67K$23.48B-8.89%
76
Outperform
Adt3.02%$250.39K$5.45B-14.25%
69
Neutral
Select Energy Services2.95%$244.86K$2.59B139.09%
62
Neutral
Arlo Technologies2.95%$244.42K$1.50B-22.94%
59
Neutral
Badger Meter2.85%$236.54K$3.84B-27.53%
78
Outperform
Johnson Controls2.75%$227.99K$87.80B36.44%
70
Outperform
Silicon Laboratories2.73%$226.23K$7.36B62.81%
56
Neutral

SIMS Technical Analysis

Technical Analysis Sentiment
Neutral
Last Price
Price Trends
50DMA
44.84
Negative
100DMA
45.43
Negative
200DMA
44.49
Negative
Market Momentum
MACD
-0.43
Negative
RSI
49.01
Neutral
STOCH
79.93
Neutral
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For SIMS, the sentiment is Neutral. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 44.29, equal to the 50-day MA of 44.84, and equal to the 200-day MA of 44.49, indicating a bearish trend. The MACD of -0.43 indicates Negative momentum. The RSI at 49.01 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 79.93 is Neutral, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Neutral sentiment for SIMS.

SIMS Peer Comparison

Comparison Results
Name
Price
Price Target
AUM
Expense Ratio
Overall Rating
$8.29M0.45%
64
Neutral
$95.12M0.50%
71
Outperform
$46.61M0.35%
68
Neutral
$42.89M0.65%
70
Outperform
$38.82M0.65%
76
Outperform
$23.84M0.55%
61
Neutral
Performance Comparison
Ticker
Company Name
Price
Change
% Change
SIMS
SPDR S&P Kensho Intelligent Structures ETF
44.16
5.24
13.46%
MILN
Global X Millennial Consumer ETF
CCSO
Carbon Collective Climate Solutions U.S. Equity ETF
RBLD
First Trust Alerian US NextGen Infrastructure ETF
XPND
First Trust Expanded Technology ETF
NUIF
Nuveen US Infrastructure ETF
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
DisclaimerThis AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents
Advertisement