RPV - ETF AI Analysis

Top Page

Invesco S&P 500 Pure Value ETF (RPV)

Rating:67Neutral

Price Target:―

RPV’s rating suggests it is a solid but not top-tier value-focused ETF, with its performance driven by several strong holdings but also weighed down by some weaker names. Strong contributors like General Motors, Ford, and Cigna support the fund with solid financial performance, strategic growth plans, and generally positive market sentiment, while holdings such as Dow and Centene, which face revenue, profitability, and leverage challenges, likely hold the overall rating back. The main risk for investors is that many key holdings face profitability pressures and economic uncertainty, which can make returns more volatile even though the fund is diversified across companies.

Positive Factors

Strong Recent Performance

The ETF has shown solid gains so far this year and in recent months, indicating positive momentum for its value-focused strategy.

Broad Sector Diversification

Holdings are spread across many sectors such as financials, health care, consumer stocks, energy, and materials, which helps reduce the impact if any one industry struggles.

Healthy Size and Liquidity

With a sizable asset base, the fund is established enough that investors are likely to benefit from better trading liquidity and fund stability.

Negative Factors

High U.S. Concentration

Almost all of the ETF’s assets are invested in U.S. companies, offering little geographic diversification if the U.S. market weakens.

Moderate Expense Ratio

The fund’s fees are not especially low for a passive ETF, which slightly reduces the net return investors keep over time.

Exposure to Some Lagging Auto Stocks

A few top holdings in the auto industry have shown weak performance this year, which can drag on overall returns if the sector remains under pressure.

RPV vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)

AUM1.55B

RegionNorth America

Expense Ratio0.35%

Beta0.62

IssuerInvesco

Inception DateMar 01, 2006

Dividend Yield2.35%

Asset ClassEquity

Index TrackedS&P 500/Citigroup Pure Value

Share Statistics

EPS (TTM)N/A

Shares OutstandingN/A

10 Day Avg. Volume257,168

30 Day Avg. Volume148,522

Financial Highlights & Ratios

PEG RatioN/A

Price to Book (P/B)N/A

Price to Sales (P/S)N/A

P/FCF RatioN/A

Enterprise Value/Market CapN/A

Enterprise Value/RevenueN/A

Enterprise Value/Gross ProfitN/A

Enterprise Value/EbitdaN/A

Forecast

1Y Price Target

129.05

Price Target Upside― Downside

Rating ConsensusModerate Buy

Number of Analyst Covering120

EPS Forecast (FY)N/A

Revenue Forecast (FY)N/A

RPV Summary

The Invesco S&P 500 Pure Value ETF (RPV) follows the S&P 500 Pure Value Index, focusing on large U.S. companies that appear cheaply priced compared with their earnings or assets. It holds well-known names like Ford, General Motors, Target, and Tyson Foods, and spreads investments across many sectors such as financials, health care, and consumer goods. Someone might invest in RPV to bet on a comeback of value stocks and to diversify across many established companies at once. A key risk is that value stocks can stay out of favor for long periods, so the price can go up and down with market swings.

How much will it cost me?The Invesco S&P 500 Pure Value ETF (RPV) has an expense ratio of 0.35%, which means you’ll pay $3.50 per year for every $1,000 invested. This cost is slightly higher than average for ETFs because it tracks a niche index and focuses on value stocks, which require more active management compared to broad market passive ETFs.

What would affect this ETF?The Invesco S&P 500 Pure Value ETF (RPV) could benefit from a strong economic recovery, as its focus on undervalued large-cap companies in sectors like health care, financials, and consumer defensive may attract investors seeking stability and growth. However, rising interest rates or economic slowdowns could negatively impact financial and cyclical sectors, while regulatory changes in health care or energy could pose risks to some of its top holdings. The ETF's U.S. focus also makes it sensitive to domestic economic and policy shifts.

RPV Top 10 Holdings

RPV’s story right now is all about classic U.S. value names, with a heavy tilt toward health care and consumer staples rather than flashy tech. Centene and Humana are doing much of the heavy lifting, with their stocks rising as investors warm back up to managed care. CVS Health is also pulling its weight, even if its chart still looks a bit choppy. On the flip side, Bunge and Dow are lagging, as commodity and chemicals demand wobbles, while Ford and GM are more or less idling in neutral, keeping returns steady rather than exciting.

Name	Company Name	Weight %	Market Value	Market Cap	Yearly Gain	Overall Rating
CNC	Centene	2.77%	$42.44M	$33.51B	102.82%	58 Neutral
HUM	Humana	2.41%	$36.92M	$47.63B	66.16%	69 Neutral
ADM	Archer Daniels Midland	2.22%	$34.05M	$37.01B	43.35%	64 Neutral
BG	Bunge Global	2.21%	$33.82M	$20.66B	46.32%	66 Neutral
CVS	CVS Health	2.08%	$31.92M	$133.62B	55.86%	64 Neutral
F	Ford Motor	1.96%	$30.07M	$53.24B	16.10%	71 Outperform
DOW	Dow Inc	1.75%	$26.89M	$19.97B	-1.44%	49 Neutral
GM	General Motors	1.70%	$26.06M	$68.53B	45.68%	73 Outperform
CI	Cigna	1.68%	$25.72M	$76.12B	-8.13%	72 Outperform
TSN	Tyson Foods	1.68%	$25.68M	$20.32B	5.38%	69 Neutral

RPV Technical Analysis

Technical Analysis Sentiment

Positive

Last Price―

Price Trends

50DMA

112.62

Positive

100DMA

110.29

Positive

200DMA

105.73

Positive

Market Momentum

MACD

0.89

Negative

RSI

59.93

Neutral

STOCH

69.10

Neutral

Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For RPV, the sentiment is Positive. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 114.58, equal to the 50-day MA of 112.62, and equal to the 200-day MA of 105.73, indicating a bullish trend. The MACD of 0.89 indicates Negative momentum. The RSI at 59.93 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 69.10 is Neutral, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Positive sentiment for RPV.

RPV Peer Comparison

Comparison Results

Name	Price	Price Target	AUM	Expense Ratio	Overall Rating
RPV	―	―	$1.55B	0.35%	67 Neutral
JAVA	―	―	$6.77B	0.44%	72 Outperform
VOOV	―	―	$6.57B	0.07%	72 Outperform
DFLV	―	―	$6.43B	0.21%	73 Outperform
IWX	―	―	$3.83B	0.20%	73 Outperform
FELV	―	―	$3.14B	0.18%	71 Outperform

Performance Comparison

RPV

Invesco S&P 500 Pure Value ETF

115.88

23.03

24.80%

JAVA

JPMorgan Active Value ETF

―

VOOV

Vanguard S&P 500 Value ETF

―

DFLV

Dimensional US Large Cap Value ETF

―

IWX

iShares Russell Top 200 Value ETF

―

FELV

Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Value ETF

―

Glossary

BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.

HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.

SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.

DisclaimerThis AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―

Table of Contents