TipRanks
Advertisement

RFG - ETF AI Analysis

Compare

Top Page

RFG

Invesco S&P Midcap 400 Pure Growth ETF (RFG)

Rating:73Outperform
Price Target:
RFG, the Invesco S&P Midcap 400 Pure Growth ETF, earns a solid overall rating largely because many of its key holdings, such as TechnipFMC, Medpace Holdings, ATI, InterDigital, and Valaris, show strong financial performance, positive earnings call sentiment, and generally favorable technical trends that support growth-focused investors. At the same time, some positions like Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals and Sterling Infrastructure face financial or valuation challenges and periods of technical weakness, which modestly weigh on the fund’s appeal. A key risk factor is the ETF’s reliance on mid-cap growth names where high valuations, overbought technical conditions, and company-specific issues like litigation or leverage can increase volatility.
Positive Factors
Strong Year-To-Date Performance
The ETF has delivered strong gains so far this year, suggesting its growth-focused strategy has been working well in the recent market environment.
Leading Growth Stocks in Top Holdings
Several of the largest positions, such as DigitalOcean, Sterling Infrastructure, and TTM Technologies, have shown strong performance, helping drive the fund’s overall results.
Broad Sector Diversification Within U.S. Midcaps
The fund spreads its investments across many sectors, including industrials, technology, health care, and others, which helps reduce the impact if any single industry struggles.
Negative Factors
Heavy Tilt Toward a Few Key Sectors
Industrials, technology, and health care make up a large share of the portfolio, so weakness in these areas could hurt the ETF more than a more evenly balanced fund.
Short-Term Performance Volatility
The ETF’s recent one-month performance has been weak compared with its stronger longer-term results, showing that returns can be bumpy over shorter periods.
Limited Geographic Diversification
With almost all holdings in U.S. companies, the fund offers little exposure to international markets, which may increase sensitivity to U.S.-specific economic and policy risks.

RFG vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)

RFG Summary

The Invesco S&P Midcap 400 Pure Growth ETF (RFG) tracks the S&P Mid Cap 400 Pure Growth Index, focusing on medium‑sized U.S. companies that are growing quickly. It holds a mix of industrial, technology, and health care businesses such as DigitalOcean Holdings and Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals, giving investors a way to spread their money across many growing firms instead of picking individual stocks. Someone might invest in RFG for long-term growth and diversification within mid-sized companies. A key risk is that growth stocks can be more volatile, so the ETF’s value can rise and fall sharply with the market.
How much will it cost me?The Invesco S&P Midcap 400 Pure Growth ETF (RFG) has an expense ratio of 0.35%, which means you’ll pay $3.50 per year for every $1,000 invested. This cost is slightly higher than average because the fund is actively managed to focus on mid-cap growth stocks, requiring more research and strategy compared to passively managed ETFs. It’s designed for investors seeking targeted exposure to companies with strong growth potential.
What would affect this ETF?The Invesco S&P Midcap 400 Pure Growth ETF (RFG) could benefit from economic growth and innovation within sectors like Industrials, Health Care, and Technology, which make up a significant portion of its holdings. However, it may face challenges if interest rates rise, as growth stocks often become less attractive in such environments, or if economic uncertainty impacts mid-cap companies more heavily than larger firms. Regulatory changes or sector-specific disruptions could also influence the performance of its top holdings.

RFG Top 10 Holdings

RFG is leaning hard into U.S. mid-cap growth, with a clear tilt toward health care, industrials, and tech names that are doing much of the heavy lifting. Halozyme and Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals are rising and help set the tone for the fund’s health care strength, while ATI and TechnipFMC add industrial and energy punch with steady-to-strong momentum. On the tech side, DigitalOcean has been a standout but also a bit of a wild card, with strong gains but shaky finances. Sterling Infrastructure and Carpenter Technology have been more mixed lately, occasionally tapping the brakes on performance.
Name
Company Name
Weight %
Market Value
Market Cap
Yearly Gain
Overall Rating
Halozyme2.81%$9.34M$12.31B43.04%
73
Outperform
TechnipFMC2.24%$7.46M$28.54B85.42%
80
Outperform
DigitalOcean Holdings2.18%$7.25M$14.55B257.38%
73
Outperform
Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals2.04%$6.78M$9.29B114.98%
57
Neutral
Twilio1.99%$6.63M$36.69B127.20%
70
Neutral
Sterling Infrastructure1.99%$6.62M$14.76B45.08%
71
Outperform
Medpace Holdings1.94%$6.46M$17.21B22.56%
79
Outperform
InterDigital1.86%$6.19M$8.48B-5.09%
76
Outperform
Valaris1.83%$6.07M$5.73B59.24%
76
Outperform
Five Below1.81%$6.02M$13.09B52.34%
76
Outperform

RFG Technical Analysis

Technical Analysis Sentiment
Negative
Last Price
Price Trends
50DMA
60.98
Negative
100DMA
61.64
Negative
200DMA
58.74
Positive
Market Momentum
MACD
-0.80
Positive
RSI
39.04
Neutral
STOCH
15.97
Positive
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For RFG, the sentiment is Negative. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 60.28, equal to the 50-day MA of 60.98, and equal to the 200-day MA of 58.74, indicating a neutral trend. The MACD of -0.80 indicates Positive momentum. The RSI at 39.04 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 15.97 is Positive, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Negative sentiment for RFG.

RFG Peer Comparison

Comparison Results
Name
Price
Price Target
AUM
Expense Ratio
Overall Rating
$332.44M0.35%
73
Outperform
$558.08M0.73%
67
Neutral
$343.72M0.31%
69
Neutral
$158.57M0.80%
74
Outperform
$145.07M0.60%
55
Neutral
$108.74M0.85%
67
Neutral
Performance Comparison
Ticker
Company Name
Price
Change
% Change
RFG
Invesco S&P Midcap 400 Pure Growth ETF
58.94
7.56
14.71%
FNY
First Trust Mid Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund
NUMG
Nuveen ESG Mid-Cap Growth ETF
GLRY
Inspire Faithward Mid Cap Momentum ESG ETF
FRTY
Alger Mid Cap 40 ETF
TMFM
Motley Fool Mid-Cap Growth ETF
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
DisclaimerThis AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents
Advertisement