POWA - ETF AI Analysis
Top Page
Invesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF (POWA)
POWA, the Invesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF, earns a solid overall rating thanks to strong, high-quality holdings like Microsoft and Accenture, which bring robust financial performance, growth in AI and cloud, and strategic partnerships that support long-term strength. Ulta Beauty and Dollar General further boost the fund with healthy earnings and generally positive technical trends, while more leveraged and volatile names such as McKesson and GoDaddy, along with other holdings facing valuation and balance sheet concerns, modestly weigh on the rating. The main risk factor is the presence of several companies with high leverage and potential overvaluation, which could increase the fund’s sensitivity to market downturns.
POWA vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)
- AUM
- 169.01M
- Region
- North America
- Expense Ratio
- 0.40%
- Beta
- 0.64
- Issuer
- Invesco
- Inception Date
- Dec 15, 2006
- Dividend Yield
- 0.92%
- Asset Class
- Equity
- Index Tracked
- Bloomberg Pricing Power Index
POWA Summary
POWA is the Invesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF, which follows the Bloomberg Pricing Power Index. It focuses on U.S. companies that can raise prices without losing too many customers, a useful trait during inflation or economic ups and downs. The fund holds a mix of sectors like technology, health care, and consumer goods, with well-known names such as Best Buy and Hormel Foods. Investors might consider POWA for broad diversification into companies that aim to protect profits in changing markets. A key risk is that the ETF can still go up and down with the overall stock market.
How much will it cost me?
The Invesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF (POWA) has an expense ratio of 0.40%, which means you’ll pay $4 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is slightly higher than average for ETFs because it is actively managed, focusing on companies with strong pricing power. Active management typically involves more research and decision-making, which can increase costs.
What would affect this ETF?
The Invesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF (POWA) could benefit from inflationary periods or economic uncertainty, as its focus on companies with strong pricing power allows them to maintain profitability even when costs rise. However, a slowdown in consumer spending or stricter regulations in key sectors like Health Care and Technology could negatively impact its performance, given its significant exposure to these industries.
POWA Top 10 Holdings
POWA leans into U.S. names with real pricing clout, and a clear tilt toward tech and health care. Keysight and TD SYNNEX have been rising steadily, acting like twin engines for recent performance, while Mettler-Toledo and Ametek add a solid, steady industrial backbone. Microsoft remains a core tech anchor with mixed near-term moves but a strong longer-term story in cloud and AI. On the softer side, Intuitive Surgical and Ulta Beauty have been more mixed, occasionally losing steam and modestly dragging on results, but still fit the fund’s pricing-power theme.
| Name | Company Name | Weight % | Market Value | Market Cap | Yearly Gain | Overall Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Accenture | 2.75% | $4.58M | $147.39B | -0.18% | 79Outperform | |
| McKesson | 2.36% | $3.94M | $116.68B | 26.21% | 62Neutral | |
| eBay | 2.39% | $3.98M | $54.03B | 27.10% | 70Outperform | |
| Mettler-Toledo | 2.36% | $3.95M | $33.47B | 16.17% | 64Neutral | |
| Ulta Beauty | 2.39% | $3.98M | $26.70B | 19.06% | 78Outperform | |
| GoDaddy | 2.35% | $3.92M | $14.28B | -14.83% | 60Neutral | |
| Microsoft | 2.18% | $3.65M | $3.90T | 0.76% | 79Outperform | |
| Dollar General | 2.19% | $3.65M | $29.27B | 28.84% | 73Outperform | |
| Intuitive Surgical | 2.29% | $3.83M | $156.78B | -17.96% | 78Outperform | |
| Marriott International | 2.19% | $3.66M | $101.88B | 44.87% | 62Neutral |
POWA Technical Analysis
Price Trends
Market Momentum
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For POWA, the sentiment is Positive. The current price of 91.73 is above the 20-day moving average (MA) of 88.98, above the 50-day MA of 89.37, and above the 200-day MA of 89.51, indicating a bullish trend. The MACD of 0.93 indicates Negative momentum. The RSI at 64.41 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 91.85 is Negative, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Positive sentiment for POWA.
POWA Peer Comparison
Comparison Results
| Name | Price | Price Target | AUM | Expense Ratio | Overall Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| $91.74 | $101.00(10.10% Upside) | $169.01M | 0.40% | 72Outperform | |
| $72.51 | $91.22(25.80% Upside) | $962.67M | 0.50% | 76Outperform | |
| $25.88 | $30.96(19.66% Upside) | $945.64M | 0.30% | 73Outperform | |
| $51.37 | $57.38(11.71% Upside) | $907.45M | 0.27% | 71Outperform | |
| $30.92 | $36.98(19.62% Upside) | $863.22M | 0.45% | 74Outperform | |
| $50.25 | $60.56(20.52% Upside) | $839.29M | 0.10% | 66Neutral |
Performance Comparison
| Show on chart | Ticker | Company Name | Price | Change | % Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| POWA | Invesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF | 91.73 | 0.43 | 0.47% | |
| HLAL | Wahed FTSE USA Shariah ETF | 72.51 | 10.62 | 17.17% | |
| SEUS | SEI QiM U.S. Equity Factor Allocation Active ETF | 25.88 | 0.61 | 2.42% | |
| AUSF | Global X Adaptive U.S. Factor ETF | 51.37 | 6.55 | 14.62% | |
| BGDV | Bahl & Gaynor Dividend ETF | 30.92 | 4.14 | 15.47% | |
| AAUB | Alpha Architect US Equity 4 ETF | 50.25 | 0.77 | 1.55% |
This AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.