POWA - ETF AI Analysis

Top Page

Invesco Bloomberg Pricing Power Etf (POWA)

Rating:72Outperform

Price Target:―

POWA, the Invesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF, earns a solid overall rating largely because many of its key holdings, like Microsoft and Garmin, show strong financial performance, positive earnings call commentary, and growth in attractive areas such as cloud, AI, and new product segments. Several other top positions, including US Foods and Roper Technologies, also add support through solid revenue and cash flow trends, though concerns about high valuations, leverage, and some bearish technical signals in names like McKesson and Best Buy slightly weigh on the fund. The main risk factor is that many holdings share similar issues of potential overvaluation and higher leverage, which could increase the fund’s sensitivity to market downturns or rising interest rates.

Positive Factors

Strong Top Holdings

Several of the largest positions, such as KLA, Best Buy, and US Foods, have shown strong gains this year, helping support the fund’s overall results.

Broad Sector Diversification

The ETF spreads its investments across technology, health care, consumer sectors, and industrials, which helps reduce the impact if any one industry struggles.

Focused U.S. Exposure

With all holdings in U.S. companies, the fund offers a clear, domestically focused way to invest in firms with pricing power in the U.S. market.

Negative Factors

Recent Weak Overall Performance

The ETF’s returns have been weak so far this year and over the last few months, which may concern investors looking for stronger recent momentum.

Mixed Results Among Top Holdings

Some key positions like Mettler-Toledo, Cooper, and Cencora have shown weak performance this year, which can drag on the fund’s overall returns.

Higher Expense Ratio for a Passive ETF

The fund’s expense ratio is on the higher side for an ETF, meaning more of the investment’s return is used to cover fees.

POWA vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)

AUM176.06M

RegionNorth America

Expense Ratio0.40%

Beta0.66

IssuerInvesco

Inception DateDec 15, 2006

Dividend Yield0.94%

Asset ClassEquity

Index TrackedBloomberg Pricing Power Index

Share Statistics

EPS (TTM)N/A

Shares OutstandingN/A

10 Day Avg. Volume1,818

30 Day Avg. Volume3,977

Financial Highlights & Ratios

PEG RatioN/A

Price to Book (P/B)N/A

Price to Sales (P/S)N/A

P/FCF RatioN/A

Enterprise Value/Market CapN/A

Enterprise Value/RevenueN/A

Enterprise Value/Gross ProfitN/A

Enterprise Value/EbitdaN/A

Forecast

1Y Price Target

106.10

Price Target Upside― Downside

Rating ConsensusModerate Buy

Number of Analyst Covering51

EPS Forecast (FY)N/A

Revenue Forecast (FY)N/A

POWA Summary

POWA is the Invesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF, which follows the Bloomberg Pricing Power Index. It focuses on U.S. companies that can raise prices without losing too many customers, a useful trait during inflation or economic ups and downs. The fund holds a mix of sectors like technology, health care, and consumer goods, with well-known names such as Best Buy and Hormel Foods. Investors might consider POWA for broad diversification into companies that aim to protect profits in changing markets. A key risk is that the ETF can still go up and down with the overall stock market.

How much will it cost me?The Invesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF (POWA) has an expense ratio of 0.40%, which means you’ll pay $4 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is slightly higher than average for ETFs because it is actively managed, focusing on companies with strong pricing power. Active management typically involves more research and decision-making, which can increase costs.

What would affect this ETF?The Invesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF (POWA) could benefit from inflationary periods or economic uncertainty, as its focus on companies with strong pricing power allows them to maintain profitability even when costs rise. However, a slowdown in consumer spending or stricter regulations in key sectors like Health Care and Technology could negatively impact its performance, given its significant exposure to these industries.

POWA Top 10 Holdings

POWA leans heavily into U.S. names with strong pricing power, and its story right now is mostly about steady, resilient growers rather than flashy momentum. Microsoft is a key engine, with rising strength in cloud and AI helping to pull the fund forward. Health care distributors like Cardinal Health and McKesson are more like dependable workhorses, contributing steady gains but facing leverage and valuation worries that keep them from sprinting. Best Buy is losing steam in the near term, slightly dragging on results, while Garmin’s mixed technical picture adds a bit of wobble to an otherwise solid, diversified mix across tech, health care, and consumer names.

Name	Company Name	Weight %	Market Value	Market Cap	Yearly Gain	Overall Rating
BBY	Best Buy Co	2.86%	$5.01M	$19.03B	18.51%	62 Neutral
USFD	US Foods Holding	2.48%	$4.34M	$22.51B	33.54%	74 Outperform
ROP	Roper Technologies	2.44%	$4.26M	$40.28B	-21.44%	71 Outperform
COR	Cencora	2.42%	$4.23M	$63.15B	13.14%	70 Neutral
MTD	Mettler-Toledo	2.40%	$4.20M	$26.95B	3.03%	64 Neutral
CAH	Cardinal Health	2.40%	$4.20M	$57.49B	65.27%	66 Neutral
MCK	McKesson	2.33%	$4.07M	$105.86B	32.09%	62 Neutral
WAT	Waters	2.32%	$4.06M	$40.22B	33.64%	70 Outperform
MSFT	Microsoft	2.29%	$4.01M	$3.71T	0.95%	79 Outperform
GRMN	Garmin	2.26%	$3.95M	$53.43B	16.70%	74 Outperform

POWA Technical Analysis

Technical Analysis Sentiment

Neutral

Last Price―

Price Trends

50DMA

90.62

Negative

100DMA

89.19

Positive

200DMA

89.80

Positive

Market Momentum

MACD

-0.21

Positive

RSI

41.86

Neutral

STOCH

22.41

Neutral

Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For POWA, the sentiment is Neutral. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 91.89, equal to the 50-day MA of 90.62, and equal to the 200-day MA of 89.80, indicating a neutral trend. The MACD of -0.21 indicates Positive momentum. The RSI at 41.86 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 22.41 is Neutral, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Neutral sentiment for POWA.

POWA Peer Comparison

Comparison Results

Name	Price	Price Target	AUM	Expense Ratio	Overall Rating
POWA	―	―	$176.06M	0.40%	72 Outperform
VFMF	―	―	$986.53M	0.18%	71 Outperform
HLAL	―	―	$954.43M	0.50%	76 Outperform
AUSF	―	―	$931.31M	0.27%	71 Outperform
FDMO	―	―	$899.78M	0.15%	72 Outperform
PFM	―	―	$804.09M	0.52%	73 Outperform

Performance Comparison

POWA

Invesco Bloomberg Pricing Power Etf

90.21

0.81

0.91%

VFMF

Vanguard U.S. Multifactor ETF

―

HLAL

Wahed FTSE USA Shariah ETF

―

AUSF

Global X Adaptive U.S. Factor ETF

―

FDMO

Fidelity Momentum Factor ETF

―

PFM

Invesco Dividend Achievers ETF

―

Glossary

BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.

HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.

SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.

DisclaimerThis AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―

Table of Contents