tiprankstipranks
Advertisement

OAKM - ETF AI Analysis

Compare

Top Page

OAKM

Oakmark U.S. Large Cap ETF (OAKM)

Rating:73Outperform
Price Target:
OAKM, the Oakmark U.S. Large Cap ETF, earns a solid overall rating driven by high-quality leaders like Salesforce, Delta Air Lines, ConocoPhillips, and Elevance Health, which all show strong financial performance, supportive earnings calls, and generally positive outlooks. These strengths are partly offset by holdings such as Keurig Dr Pepper and Airbnb, where bearish technical trends and valuation concerns introduce some caution. A key risk factor is the fund’s exposure to several companies with signs of short-term volatility or overvaluation, which could lead to bumpier performance at times.
Positive Factors
Growing Asset Base
The fund manages over a billion dollars, suggesting that it has attracted meaningful investor interest and liquidity.
Strong Performance From Several Top Holdings
Key positions in companies like Conocophillips, State Street, Citigroup, Targa Resources, Airbnb, and Corteva have shown strong gains this year, helping support the ETF’s overall results.
Broad Sector Diversification Within the U.S.
The ETF spreads its investments across many sectors, including financials, health care, energy, industrials, and technology, which helps reduce the impact of weakness in any single industry.
Negative Factors
Higher Expense Ratio
The fund’s fee is on the higher side for an ETF, which can eat into long-term returns compared with lower-cost alternatives.
Heavy Tilt Toward Financial Stocks
With a large share of assets in financial companies, the ETF is more exposed to risks specific to banks and other financial institutions.
Mixed Performance Among Top Holdings
Some major positions such as Salesforce, Willis Towers Watson, Intercontinental Exchange, and Bank of America have shown weak or negative performance this year, which can drag on the fund’s overall returns.

OAKM vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)

OAKM Summary

The Oakmark U.S. Large Cap ETF (OAKM) is an actively managed fund that invests in large, well-known U.S. companies that its managers believe are undervalued. It doesn’t track a specific index, but follows a value-investing approach, focusing on solid businesses that may be temporarily out of favor. Top holdings include familiar names like Bank of America and Salesforce, along with energy and financial companies such as ConocoPhillips and Citigroup. Investors might consider OAKM for long-term growth and diversification across many big U.S. firms. However, its share price can go up and down with the stock market and value stocks can stay out of favor for long periods.
How much will it cost me?The Oakmark U.S. Large Cap ETF (OAKM) has an expense ratio of 0.59%, meaning you’ll pay $5.90 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is higher than average because the fund is actively managed, requiring more research and oversight to select undervalued large-cap stocks.
What would affect this ETF?The Oakmark U.S. Large Cap ETF (OAKM) could benefit from a strong U.S. economy and rising interest rates, which may positively impact its significant exposure to financial stocks. However, challenges such as regulatory changes in the financial sector or economic slowdowns could negatively affect its performance. Additionally, shifts in consumer behavior or technological advancements may influence holdings like Alphabet and Warner Bros, either boosting or hindering growth potential.

OAKM Top 10 Holdings

This Oakmark U.S. Large Cap ETF leans heavily on U.S. value names, with financials and energy setting the tone. Targa Resources and Phillips 66 have been the fund’s workhorses, riding strong energy markets, while ConocoPhillips has cooled a bit recently but remains a solid contributor over the year. On the financial side, State Street is steadily pulling its weight, even as Citigroup’s progress looks a bit more mixed. Salesforce and Airbnb, both lagging lately, show that the fund’s smaller tech and platform bets can add some turbulence to an otherwise value-heavy, U.S.-focused lineup.
Name
Company Name
Weight %
Market Value
Market Cap
Yearly Gain
Overall Rating
State Street4.23%$45.06M$44.78B65.78%
75
Outperform
Targa Resources4.06%$43.29M$58.50B61.13%
74
Outperform
Citigroup3.93%$41.85M$228.73B70.17%
68
Neutral
Keurig Dr Pepper3.84%$40.92M$43.13B-4.34%
71
Outperform
Elevance Health3.69%$39.32M$87.86B3.36%
76
Outperform
Salesforce3.39%$36.08M$139.98B-35.96%
80
Outperform
Delta Air Lines3.36%$35.84M$50.24B67.41%
80
Outperform
Conocophillips3.33%$35.51M$146.10B26.64%
78
Outperform
Bank of America3.26%$34.78M$387.05B23.62%
72
Outperform
Airbnb3.18%$33.86M$77.81B-7.00%
71
Outperform

OAKM Technical Analysis

Technical Analysis Sentiment
Positive
Last Price
Price Trends
50DMA
28.07
Positive
100DMA
28.05
Positive
200DMA
27.57
Positive
Market Momentum
MACD
0.05
Negative
RSI
55.49
Neutral
STOCH
50.72
Neutral
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For OAKM, the sentiment is Positive. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 28.07, equal to the 50-day MA of 28.07, and equal to the 200-day MA of 27.57, indicating a bullish trend. The MACD of 0.05 indicates Negative momentum. The RSI at 55.49 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 50.72 is Neutral, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Positive sentiment for OAKM.

OAKM Peer Comparison

Comparison Results
Name
Price
Price Target
AUM
Expense Ratio
Overall Rating
$1.06B0.59%
73
Outperform
$6.61B0.44%
72
Outperform
$6.24B0.21%
73
Outperform
$3.03B0.18%
71
Outperform
$1.85B0.39%
72
Outperform
$1.43B0.15%
73
Outperform
Performance Comparison
Ticker
Company Name
Price
Change
% Change
OAKM
Oakmark U.S. Large Cap ETF
28.32
3.32
13.28%
JAVA
JPMorgan Active Value ETF
DFLV
Dimensional US Large Cap Value ETF
FELV
Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Value ETF
DSTL
Distillate US Fundamental Stability & Value ETF
SEIV
SEI Enhanced U.S. Large Cap Value Factor ETF
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
DisclaimerThis AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents
Advertisement