tiprankstipranks
Advertisement

OAKM - ETF AI Analysis

Compare

Top Page

OAKM

Oakmark U.S. Large Cap ETF (OAKM)

Rating:73Outperform
Price Target:
OAKM, the Oakmark U.S. Large Cap ETF, has a solid overall rating driven by several strong, well-positioned companies with healthy earnings and strategic growth plans. Standout holdings like Delta Air Lines, Willis Towers Watson, and Corteva support the fund’s quality through robust revenue growth, strategic execution, and positive corporate developments, while names such as Keurig Dr Pepper and Airbnb add growth potential but introduce some caution due to bearish technical signals and higher valuations. The main risk factor is the fund’s meaningful exposure to large financial and consumer-related companies, which can be sensitive to economic conditions and market volatility.
Positive Factors
Strong Top Holdings
Several of the largest positions, such as State Street and Targa Resources, have shown strong gains so far this year, helping support the ETF’s overall performance.
Broad Sector Diversification
The fund spreads its assets across many sectors, including financials, industrials, health care, consumer stocks, energy, and technology, which helps reduce the impact of weakness in any single industry.
Solid Recent Performance
The ETF has delivered positive returns over the past month, three months, and year to date, indicating steady recent momentum.
Negative Factors
Heavy Financials Exposure
With a large share of assets in financial companies, the fund is more sensitive to problems in banks and other financial institutions.
Underperforming Top Holdings
Some major positions, such as Capital One Financial and Willis Towers Watson, have shown weak performance this year, which can drag on the fund’s results.
Limited International Diversification
Almost all of the ETF’s holdings are in U.S. companies, offering little protection if the U.S. market faces a downturn while other regions do better.

OAKM vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)

OAKM Summary

The Oakmark U.S. Large Cap ETF (OAKM) is a fund that invests in big, well-known American companies that its managers believe are currently priced cheaply compared with their true value. It doesn’t track a set index, but instead follows a value theme, picking large U.S. firms across many sectors like financials, health care, and industrials. Well-known holdings include Bank of America and Citigroup. Someone might invest in OAKM to seek long-term growth from solid, established companies while staying diversified across industries. A key risk is that these stocks can still fall in price and move up and down with the overall U.S. stock market.
How much will it cost me?The Oakmark U.S. Large Cap ETF (OAKM) has an expense ratio of 0.59%, meaning you’ll pay $5.90 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is higher than average because the fund is actively managed, requiring more research and oversight to select undervalued large-cap stocks.
What would affect this ETF?The Oakmark U.S. Large Cap ETF (OAKM) could benefit from a strong U.S. economy and rising interest rates, which may positively impact its significant exposure to financial stocks. However, challenges such as regulatory changes in the financial sector or economic slowdowns could negatively affect its performance. Additionally, shifts in consumer behavior or technological advancements may influence holdings like Alphabet and Warner Bros, either boosting or hindering growth potential.

OAKM Top 10 Holdings

OAKM leans heavily into U.S. financials, with State Street and Bank of America acting as key engines for the fund, both showing rising momentum that fits its value-first playbook. Citigroup is more of a steady contributor, while Capital One has been lagging, occasionally throwing sand in the gears. Outside finance, Targa Resources in energy and Merck in health care are quietly powering returns, giving the portfolio some sector balance. With all holdings U.S.-based, this ETF is essentially a concentrated bet on American large-cap value, especially in the financial sector.
Name
Company Name
Weight %
Market Value
Market Cap
Yearly Gain
Overall Rating
Willis Towers Watson3.71%$42.11M$31.20B6.54%
75
Outperform
Citigroup3.63%$41.21M$227.14B45.06%
68
Neutral
Targa Resources3.53%$40.01M$58.03B60.54%
74
Outperform
Keurig Dr Pepper3.53%$39.99M$42.34B-7.12%
71
Outperform
Airbnb3.46%$39.22M$91.32B15.03%
71
Outperform
Bank of America3.45%$39.14M$439.63B36.27%
72
Outperform
Capital One Financial3.44%$38.99M$128.22B3.27%
71
Outperform
State Street3.39%$38.47M$50.59B67.31%
75
Outperform
Delta Air Lines3.37%$38.17M$57.50B74.39%
80
Outperform
Salesforce3.30%$37.43M$150.71B-26.30%
80
Outperform

OAKM Technical Analysis

Technical Analysis Sentiment
Positive
Last Price
Price Trends
50DMA
28.82
Positive
100DMA
28.32
Positive
200DMA
28.05
Positive
Market Momentum
MACD
0.50
Negative
RSI
72.74
Negative
STOCH
94.38
Negative
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For OAKM, the sentiment is Positive. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 29.64, equal to the 50-day MA of 28.82, and equal to the 200-day MA of 28.05, indicating a bullish trend. The MACD of 0.50 indicates Negative momentum. The RSI at 72.74 is Negative, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 94.38 is Negative, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Positive sentiment for OAKM.

OAKM Peer Comparison

Comparison Results
Name
Price
Price Target
AUM
Expense Ratio
Overall Rating
$1.14B0.59%
73
Outperform
$7.00B0.44%
72
Outperform
$6.77B0.21%
73
Outperform
$3.29B0.18%
72
Outperform
$1.98B0.39%
73
Outperform
$1.46B0.15%
72
Outperform
Performance Comparison
Ticker
Company Name
Price
Change
% Change
OAKM
Oakmark U.S. Large Cap ETF
30.67
5.45
21.61%
JAVA
JPMorgan Active Value ETF
DFLV
Dimensional US Large Cap Value ETF
FELV
Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Value ETF
DSTL
Distillate US Fundamental Stability & Value ETF
SEIV
SEI Enhanced U.S. Large Cap Value Factor ETF
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
DisclaimerThis AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents
Advertisement