NVPS - ETF AI Analysis
Top Page
PurePlay Nvidia Ecosystem Picks & Shovels Index ETF (NVPS)
Rating:60Neutral
Price Target:―
Positive Factors
Strong Top Holdings
Many of the largest positions, such as Micron, TSMC, and key chip-equipment makers, have shown strong year-to-date performance, helping support the fund’s returns.
Focused Nvidia Ecosystem Exposure
The ETF targets companies that supply or benefit from Nvidia’s growth, giving investors concentrated exposure to a key area of the semiconductor and AI supply chain.
Global Semiconductor Supply Chain Reach
Holdings across the U.S., Japan, and Europe provide access to major players in the global chip and equipment ecosystem, adding some geographic diversification within this niche theme.
Negative Factors
High Thematic Concentration
The fund is heavily focused on technology and the Nvidia ecosystem, which increases risk if this specific theme or sector faces a downturn.
Recent Weak Overall Performance
Despite strong individual holdings, the ETF’s year-to-date performance has been weak, which may concern investors looking for steadier returns.
Relatively High Expense Ratio
The fund’s expense ratio is on the higher side for an ETF, meaning more of the investment’s return is used to cover fees.
NVPS vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)
AUM4.94M
RegionNorth America
Expense Ratio0.75%
Beta1.88
IssuerPurePlay
Inception DateJun 18, 2026
Dividend YieldN/A
Asset ClassEquity
Index TrackedSolactive Nvidia Ecosystem Picks & Shovels Index - USD - Benchmark TR Net
Share Statistics
EPS (TTM)N/A
Shares OutstandingN/A
10 Day Avg. Volume6,977
30 Day Avg. Volume19,819
Financial Highlights & Ratios
PEG RatioN/A
Price to Book (P/B)N/A
Price to Sales (P/S)N/A
P/FCF RatioN/A
Enterprise Value/Market CapN/A
Enterprise Value/RevenueN/A
Enterprise Value/Gross ProfitN/A
Enterprise Value/EbitdaN/A
Forecast
1Y Price Target
27.01Price Target Upside― Downside
Rating ConsensusModerate Buy
Number of Analyst Covering34
EPS Forecast (FY)N/A
Revenue Forecast (FY)N/A
NVPS Summary
The PurePlay Nvidia Ecosystem Picks & Shovels Index ETF (NVPS) tracks the Solactive Nvidia Ecosystem Picks & Shovels Index, focusing on companies that help make and support Nvidia’s chips and AI products. Instead of owning Nvidia itself, it holds suppliers like Micron and TSMC that provide memory, manufacturing, and equipment used in Nvidia’s graphics and AI chips. Someone might invest in NVPS to tap into the long-term growth of AI and high-performance computing while spreading money across many related companies. A key risk is that it is heavily tied to the tech and semiconductor industry, so its price can swing sharply with that sector.
How much will it cost me?This ETF has an expense ratio of 0.75%, which means you’ll pay about $7.50 per year for every $1,000 you invest. That’s higher than the average ETF because it’s a specialized, theme-focused fund that tracks a narrow Nvidia-related ecosystem rather than a broad, low-cost index.
What would affect this ETF?This ETF could benefit if demand for AI and high-performance computing keeps growing, since many of its top holdings are key technology and chip suppliers to Nvidia’s ecosystem in the U.S. and Asia. On the other hand, it could be hurt by higher interest rates that pressure tech stocks, slowdowns in global chip spending, supply-chain disruptions in places like Taiwan and Korea, or new regulations affecting semiconductors and data centers.
NVPS Top 10 Holdings
This ETF is essentially a backstage pass to Nvidia’s world, with performance driven by a tight cluster of chip and equipment names. Micron and Marvell have been rising over the past few months on AI memory and data center momentum, though both have seen some recent wobbling that can hold the fund back in the short term. TSMC, Applied Materials, Lam Research, and ASML form a powerful semiconductor manufacturing spine, mostly steady to rising and helping keep returns on track. The fund is heavily tilted toward tech hardware and equipment, with a global footprint spanning the U.S., Taiwan, Korea, and Japan.
Name | Company Name | Weight % | Market Value | Market Cap | Yearly Gain | Overall Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TSMC | 7.96% | $392.94K | $1.91T | 72.86% | 81 Outperform | |
| Vertiv Holdings | 7.07% | $348.97K | $104.87B | 93.16% | 77 Outperform | |
| Micron | 5.32% | $262.61K | $991.12B | 595.93% | 79 Outperform | |
| ASML Holding | 3.55% | $175.08K | $661.10B | 140.32% | 81 Outperform | |
| Schneider Electric | 3.50% | $172.82K | €171.50B | 39.00% | 62 Neutral | |
| Eaton | 3.36% | $165.97K | $174.27B | 23.56% | 75 Outperform | |
| Lam Research | 3.31% | $163.62K | $389.37B | 200.39% | 77 Outperform | |
| Applied Materials | 3.30% | $162.90K | $428.06B | 183.18% | 77 Outperform | |
| Digital Realty | 3.28% | $161.65K | $71.71B | 13.38% | 69 Neutral | |
| Super Micro Computer | 3.15% | $155.35K | $20.14B | -30.40% | 58 Neutral |
NVPS Technical Analysis
Positive
―
Price Trends
Market Momentum
-0.69
Negative
46.85
Neutral
83.49
Negative
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For NVPS, the sentiment is Positive. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 22.07, equal to the 50-day MA of ―, and equal to the 200-day MA of ―, indicating a neutral trend. The MACD of -0.69 indicates Negative momentum. The RSI at 46.85 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 83.49 is Negative, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Positive sentiment for NVPS.
NVPS Peer Comparison
Comparison Results
Performance Comparison
NVPS
PurePlay Nvidia Ecosystem Picks & Shovels Index ETF
22.79
-5.46
-19.33%
RBLD
First Trust Alerian US NextGen Infrastructure ETF
―
―
―
CCSO
Carbon Collective Climate Solutions U.S. Equity ETF
―
―
―
XPND
First Trust Expanded Technology ETF
―
―
―
TEC
Harbor Transformative Technologies ETF
―
―
―
USMD
CoreValues America First Technology ETF
―
―
―
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
DisclaimerThis AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents