TipRanks
Advertisement

NSIV - ETF AI Analysis

Compare

Top Page

NSIV

North Square Disciplined Value ETF (NSIV)

Rating:72Outperform
Price Target:―
NSIV, the North Square Disciplined Value ETF, appears to be a solid, quality-focused fund, helped by major positions in strong, profitable companies like Apple, Microsoft, Alphabet, and Verizon, all of which show healthy financials and supportive long-term outlooks. Some holdings such as Citigroup and Pfizer face revenue growth, profitability, or economic challenges that may temper the fund’s overall appeal. A key risk is the fund’s meaningful exposure to large tech names, which can increase sensitivity to shifts in technology valuations and market sentiment.
Positive Factors
Strong Mega-Cap Tech and Communication Holdings
Top positions in companies like Apple, Amazon, Microsoft, Alphabet, and Verizon have shown generally strong year-to-date performance, helping support the ETF’s overall returns.
Broad Sector Diversification
The fund is spread across many sectors, including financials, technology, health care, energy, and consumer industries, which helps reduce the impact if any single sector struggles.
Moderate Expense Ratio
The ETF’s expense ratio is reasonably low for an actively managed value strategy, allowing investors to keep more of the fund’s gross returns.
Negative Factors
Heavy U.S. Market Dependence
With almost all assets in U.S. companies and very little exposure abroad, the fund’s performance is highly tied to the health of the U.S. market.
Concentration in a Small Group of Large Holdings
A meaningful share of the portfolio is invested in a handful of big names, which increases the risk that weakness in any one of these companies could drag down the fund.
Mixed Recent Performance Trend
While the ETF is up year-to-date, its recent one-month performance has been weak, suggesting short-term momentum has cooled.

NSIV vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)

NSIV Summary

The North Square Disciplined Value ETF (NSIV) is a U.S. stock fund that focuses on large, established companies considered “value” stocks—businesses that appear reasonably priced based on their earnings and cash flow. It doesn’t track a single index, but aims to beat the Russell 1000 Value Index by carefully selecting and diversifying across sectors like financials, technology, health care, and energy. Well-known holdings include Amazon and Apple. Investors might consider NSIV for long-term growth with a value tilt and broad sector diversification. A key risk is that its stock prices can rise and fall with the overall market and value stocks can lag for long periods.
How much will it cost me?This ETF has an expense ratio of 0.38%, which means you’ll pay about $3.80 per year for every $1,000 invested. That’s a bit higher than the average low-cost index ETF because this fund is actively managed, using research and stock selection to try to beat a value index over time.
What would affect this ETF?This ETF focuses on large U.S. companies in sectors like financials, technology, health care, and energy, so it could benefit if the U.S. economy stays resilient, corporate profits grow, and value-style stocks come back into favor, especially for its big tech and financial holdings like Apple, Microsoft, Amazon, and major banks. On the other hand, rising interest rates, a U.S. recession, tighter banking regulations, or weak performance in energy and communication services could hurt the fund, and its active stock-picking approach may lag if value stocks or its chosen sectors fall out of favor.

NSIV Top 10 Holdings

NSIV leans heavily on U.S. large-cap value names, with Big Tech and financials sharing the driver’s seat. Apple and Microsoft have been rising steadily, giving the fund a tech-powered tailwind despite their premium valuations. Alphabet adds another layer of growth, though its recent moves have been more mixed. On the value side, Verizon and US Bancorp are contributing, but their shorter-term performance has been choppy, while Citigroup and Hartford have been more of a drag. Overall, it’s a U.S.-centric blend of cash-generating banks and mega-cap tech leaders.
Name
Company Name
Weight %
Market Value
Market Cap
Yearly Gain
Overall Rating
Amazon4.23%$3.10M$2.75T15.79%
71
Outperform
Apple3.97%$2.90M$4.96T33.53%
79
Outperform
Microsoft3.74%$2.74M$3.70T-2.38%
79
Outperform
Verizon3.66%$2.68M$192.99B7.74%
81
Outperform
US Bancorp3.38%$2.48M$92.61B20.86%
76
Outperform
Alphabet Class C3.08%$2.25M$4.27T40.18%
82
Outperform
Shell2.94%$2.15M$265.37B31.30%
78
Outperform
Pfizer2.89%$2.12M$159.19B15.94%
74
Outperform
Citigroup2.88%$2.11M$222.21B28.61%
68
Neutral
Hartford Insurance2.79%$2.04M$34.87B-2.34%
78
Outperform

NSIV Technical Analysis

Technical Analysis Sentiment
Negative
Last Price―
Price Trends
50DMA
25.94
Negative
100DMA
200DMA
Market Momentum
MACD
-0.07
Positive
RSI
35.58
Neutral
STOCH
6.12
Positive
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For NSIV, the sentiment is Negative. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 26.05, equal to the 50-day MA of 25.94, and equal to the 200-day MA of ―, indicating a neutral trend. The MACD of -0.07 indicates Positive momentum. The RSI at 35.58 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 6.12 is Positive, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Negative sentiment for NSIV.

NSIV Peer Comparison

Comparison Results
Name
Price
Price Target
AUM
Expense Ratio
Overall Rating
――$73.30M0.38%
72
Outperform
――$93.96M0.75%
75
Outperform
――$90.73M0.36%
72
Outperform
――$69.95M0.55%
73
Outperform
――$69.78M0.60%
68
Neutral
――$68.52M0.49%
74
Outperform
Performance Comparison
Ticker
Company Name
Price
Change
% Change
NSIV
North Square Disciplined Value ETF
25.46
0.28
1.11%
MAVF
Matrix Advisors Value ETF
―
―
―
PRXV
Praxis Impact Large Cap Value ETF
―
―
―
DHLX
Diamond Hill Large Cap Concentrated ETF
―
―
―
PZLV
Pzena U.S. Large Cap Value ETF
―
―
―
DVAL
BrandywineGLOBAL - Dynamic US Large Cap Value ETF
―
―
―
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
DisclaimerThis AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents
Advertisement