MISL - ETF AI Analysis
Top Page
First Trust Indxx Aerospace & Defense ETF (MISL)
Rating:68Neutral
Price Target:―
Positive Factors
Strong AUM Base
The fund manages a sizable pool of assets, suggesting solid investor interest and liquidity for trading.
Several Strong-Performing Core Holdings
Key positions like Lockheed Martin, Rocket Lab USA, Howmet Aerospace, and L3Harris Technologies have shown strong year-to-date performance, helping support the ETF’s returns.
Focused Industry Exposure
The ETF’s heavy tilt toward aerospace and defense within the industrials and technology sectors offers targeted exposure for investors who want to concentrate on this theme.
Negative Factors
High Expense Ratio
The fund’s expense ratio is relatively high for an ETF, which can eat into long-term returns compared with lower-cost alternatives.
Recent Weak Short-Term Performance
The ETF has experienced weak performance over the past one and three months, which may signal near-term volatility or pressure in its holdings.
Concentrated and U.S.-Only Exposure
The portfolio is heavily concentrated in a handful of aerospace and defense names and is almost entirely invested in U.S. companies, increasing both stock-specific and country-specific risk.
MISL vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)
AUM830.66M
RegionNorth America
Expense Ratio0.65%
Beta0.89
IssuerFirst Trust
Inception DateOct 25, 2022
Dividend Yield0.42%
Asset ClassEquity
Index TrackedIndxx US Aerospace & Defense Index - Benchmark TR Gross
Share Statistics
EPS (TTM)N/A
Shares OutstandingN/A
10 Day Avg. Volume134,726
30 Day Avg. Volume502,118
Financial Highlights & Ratios
PEG RatioN/A
Price to Book (P/B)N/A
Price to Sales (P/S)N/A
P/FCF RatioN/A
Enterprise Value/Market CapN/A
Enterprise Value/RevenueN/A
Enterprise Value/Gross ProfitN/A
Enterprise Value/EbitdaN/A
Forecast
1Y Price Target
55.19Price Target Upside― Downside
Rating ConsensusModerate Buy
Number of Analyst Covering38
EPS Forecast (FY)N/A
Revenue Forecast (FY)N/A
MISL Summary
MISL is an ETF that follows the Indxx Aerospace & Defense Index, focusing on U.S. companies involved in aviation, space, and military technology. It holds well-known names like Boeing and Lockheed Martin, along with other firms working on aircraft, satellites, and defense systems. Someone might invest in MISL to tap into potential long-term growth in air travel, space exploration, and defense spending, while getting diversification across many companies in this niche. A key risk is that it is heavily concentrated in the aerospace and defense sector, so its value can swing sharply with industry news, government budgets, and global conflicts.
How much will it cost me?The expense ratio for the First Trust Indxx Aerospace & Defense ETF (MISL) is 0.6%, which means you’ll pay $6 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is higher than average because the fund is actively managed and focuses on a specialized sector, requiring more research and management effort.
What would affect this ETF?The MISL ETF, focused on aerospace and defense, could benefit from increased government spending on defense and advancements in space exploration, which may drive growth for its top holdings like Boeing and Lockheed Martin. However, it may face challenges from potential defense budget cuts, geopolitical tensions, or regulatory changes impacting the sector. Additionally, economic slowdowns could negatively affect demand for aerospace innovation and technology.
MISL Top 10 Holdings
MISL is a pure play on U.S. aerospace and defense, with most of its firepower in industrial heavyweights and a dash of tech. Rocket Lab has been the rocket booster lately, surging on contract wins and optimism around space launches, while steady climbers like Howmet and General Dynamics help keep the fund aloft. On the other side, Boeing’s ongoing troubles and a cooling Palantir have been tugging at returns, with names like RTX and GE Aerospace also seeing more mixed trading, leaving the ETF somewhat reliant on a few high-flying winners to offset the laggards.
Name | Company Name | Weight % | Market Value | Market Cap | Yearly Gain | Overall Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Palantir Technologies | 9.72% | $77.96M | $375.28B | 21.67% | 74 Outperform | |
| GE Aerospace | 8.16% | $65.44M | $337.79B | 31.16% | 72 Outperform | |
| Boeing | 7.99% | $64.05M | $182.22B | 6.07% | 54 Neutral | |
| Rocket Lab USA | 6.97% | $55.89M | $83.06B | 360.11% | 57 Neutral | |
| RTX | 6.71% | $53.79M | $241.95B | 26.88% | 74 Outperform | |
| Lockheed Martin | 6.52% | $52.28M | $122.30B | 7.87% | 70 Outperform | |
| HEICO | 4.35% | $34.90M | $41.12B | 10.75% | 77 Outperform | |
| AST SpaceMobile | 4.31% | $34.59M | $44.02B | 337.47% | 54 Neutral | |
| Transdigm Group | 3.98% | $31.94M | $70.38B | -14.81% | 69 Neutral | |
| General Dynamics | 3.92% | $31.46M | $93.79B | 23.03% | 80 Outperform |
MISL Technical Analysis
Positive
―
Price Trends
45.72
Positive
47.26
Positive
44.24
Positive
Market Momentum
0.71
Negative
55.69
Neutral
71.12
Neutral
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For MISL, the sentiment is Positive. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 46.01, equal to the 50-day MA of 45.72, and equal to the 200-day MA of 44.24, indicating a bullish trend. The MACD of 0.71 indicates Negative momentum. The RSI at 55.69 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 71.12 is Neutral, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Positive sentiment for MISL.
MISL Peer Comparison
Comparison Results
Performance Comparison
MISL
First Trust Indxx Aerospace & Defense ETF
47.29
12.41
35.58%
FXR
First Trust Industrials/Producer Durables AlphaDEX Fund
―
―
―
PKB
Invesco Dynamic Building & Construction ETF
―
―
―
PRN
Invesco DWA Industrials Momentum ETF
―
―
―
RSHO
Tema American Reshoring ETF
―
―
―
XTN
SPDR S&P Transportation ETF
―
―
―
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
DisclaimerThis AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents