tiprankstipranks
Trending News
More News >
Advertisement

LCTD - AI Analysis

Compare

Top Page

LCTD

BlackRock World ex U.S. Carbon Transition Readiness ETF (LCTD)

Rating:66Neutral
Price Target:
$58.00
The overall rating of the BlackRock World ex U.S. Carbon Transition Readiness ETF (LCTD) reflects a solid mix of strong financial performers among its top holdings. HSBC and ASML Holding NV stand out as key contributors, with HSBC benefiting from robust profitability and strategic growth initiatives, while ASML demonstrates impressive revenue growth and high profitability. However, weaker holdings like Iberdrola, which faces valuation concerns and neutral technical trends, may have slightly tempered the fund's overall rating. A potential risk is the ETF's exposure to concentrated holdings in specific sectors or regions, which could impact diversification.
Positive Factors
Strong Top Holdings
Several of the largest positions, such as ASML Holding NV and Siemens, have delivered strong year-to-date performance, supporting the ETF's overall returns.
Global Diversification
The ETF invests across multiple countries, including Japan, the UK, and Canada, reducing reliance on any single geographic market.
Low Expense Ratio
With an expense ratio of 0.2%, the ETF is cost-efficient compared to many actively managed funds.
Negative Factors
Underperforming Holding
SAP SE, one of the top holdings, has shown weak year-to-date performance, which could drag on the fund's overall returns.
Sector Concentration in Financials
The ETF has a heavy allocation to the financial sector, making it more sensitive to downturns in banking and related industries.
Limited U.S. Exposure
With only 12% of its portfolio allocated to U.S. companies, the ETF may miss out on stronger growth opportunities in the world's largest economy.

LCTD vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)

LCTD Summary

The BlackRock World ex U.S. Carbon Transition Readiness ETF (LCTD) is an investment fund focused on companies outside the U.S. that are actively transitioning to a low-carbon economy. It includes businesses from various sectors, such as financials, industrials, and technology, with top holdings like HSBC Holdings and ASML Holding NV. Investors might consider this ETF to diversify internationally while supporting environmentally responsible companies that are adapting to global sustainability trends. However, new investors should be aware that the fund’s performance can be influenced by global market fluctuations and the success of the carbon transition efforts of its holdings.
How much will it cost me?The BlackRock World ex U.S. Carbon Transition Readiness ETF (LCTD) has an expense ratio of 0.20%, meaning you’ll pay $2 per year for every $1,000 invested. This cost is lower than average for actively managed funds, as it focuses on a specific theme—low-carbon transition—while still maintaining competitive fees.
What would affect this ETF?The ETF's focus on companies transitioning to a low-carbon economy could benefit from global policies promoting sustainability and increased demand for green technologies, especially in developed markets outside the U.S. However, it may face challenges from regulatory changes, economic slowdowns in key regions, or reduced investment in carbon transition initiatives. Sector exposure to financials and industrials adds potential for growth but also vulnerability to interest rate fluctuations and economic cycles.

LCTD Top 10 Holdings

The BlackRock World ex U.S. Carbon Transition Readiness ETF is leaning heavily on financials and industrials, with names like HSBC and Siemens playing pivotal roles. HSBC has shown mixed signals recently, with steady long-term growth but short-term softness, while Siemens is rising steadily thanks to solid revenue growth. ASML Holding NV from the technology sector is a standout performer, riding strong demand for its semiconductor equipment. On the flip side, SAP SE has been lagging, holding back the fund with weaker momentum. Overall, the ETF’s focus on developed markets outside the U.S. provides a diversified yet sector-concentrated approach to the low-carbon transition theme.
Name
Company Name
Weight %
Market Value
Market Cap
Yearly Gain
Overall Rating
HSBC Holdings1.85%$4.67M£184.65B52.00%
79
Outperform
ASML Holding NV1.61%$4.07M€351.20B43.73%
78
Outperform
AstraZeneca1.50%$3.79M£194.71B12.08%
75
Outperform
Canadian Bank of Commerce1.44%$3.65MC$107.20B30.56%
78
Outperform
SAP SE1.38%$3.48M€261.78B1.36%
73
Outperform
Schneider Electric1.34%$3.38M€144.81B5.76%
75
Outperform
Siemens1.33%$3.36M€192.47B37.22%
74
Outperform
Iberdrola1.33%$3.35M€116.41B27.42%
67
Neutral
Hitachi,Ltd.1.31%$3.32M¥22.16T29.40%
75
Outperform
Royal Bank Of Canada1.28%$3.23M$206.19B18.70%
75
Outperform

LCTD Technical Analysis

Technical Analysis Sentiment
Positive
Last Price
Price Trends
50DMA
53.25
Positive
100DMA
51.98
Positive
200DMA
49.08
Positive
Market Momentum
MACD
0.33
Negative
RSI
54.92
Neutral
STOCH
66.19
Neutral
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For LCTD, the sentiment is Positive. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 53.97, equal to the 50-day MA of 53.25, and equal to the 200-day MA of 49.08, indicating a bullish trend. The MACD of 0.33 indicates Negative momentum. The RSI at 54.92 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 66.19 is Neutral, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Positive sentiment for LCTD.

LCTD Peer Comparison

Comparison Results
Name
Price
Price Target
AUM
Expense Ratio
Overall Rating
$254.31M0.20%
66
Neutral
$809.10M0.75%
69
Neutral
$588.35M0.65%
71
Outperform
$526.01M0.75%
67
Neutral
$443.13M0.75%
59
Neutral
$147.64M0.19%
69
Neutral
Performance Comparison
Ticker
Company Name
Price
Change
% Change
LCTD
BlackRock World ex U.S. Carbon Transition Readiness ETF
54.14
9.93
22.46%
PWRD
Tcw Transform Systems Etf
FEPI
REX FANG & Innovation Equity Premium Income ETF
ARKX
ARK Space Exploration & Innovation ETF
WGMI
Valkyrie Bitcoin Miners ETF
IQSZ
Invesco Global Equity Net Zero ETF
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.

Disclaimer

This AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents
Advertisement