tiprankstipranks
Trending News
More News >
Advertisement

IRET - AI Analysis

Compare

Top Page

IRET

iREIT - MarketVector Quality REIT Index ETF (IRET)

Rating:70Outperform
Price Target:
$21.50
The iREIT - MarketVector Quality REIT Index ETF (IRET) has a solid overall rating, reflecting a mix of strong financial performers and strategic growth initiatives among its holdings. CareTrust REIT (CTRE) stands out as a key contributor due to its robust profitability, revenue growth, and strategic investments, which support a positive outlook. However, SBA Communications (SBAC) appears to be a weaker holding, with financial leverage concerns and valuation challenges that may slightly weigh on the ETF’s overall rating. Investors should note the ETF's exposure to valuation risks across several holdings, which could impact its future performance.
Positive Factors
Strong Performing Holdings
Several top holdings, such as Rexford Industrial Realty and Eastgroup Properties, have delivered strong year-to-date gains, supporting the fund's overall performance.
Focused Sector Exposure
The ETF's heavy allocation to the real estate sector provides targeted exposure to a historically stable and income-generating industry.
Steady Short-Term Performance
The ETF has shown positive returns over the past one and three months, indicating recent momentum despite year-to-date challenges.
Negative Factors
High Geographic Concentration
With over 99% of its holdings in U.S.-based companies, the ETF lacks diversification across global markets, increasing sensitivity to domestic economic conditions.
Sector Over-Concentration
The fund's 95% allocation to real estate limits diversification and increases vulnerability to downturns in this single sector.
Mixed Holding Performance
Some top holdings, such as Equinix and Danaher, have underperformed year-to-date, potentially dragging on overall returns.

IRET vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)

IRET Summary

The iREIT - MarketVector Quality REIT Index ETF (Ticker: IRET) is an investment fund that focuses on Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs), which are companies owning income-generating properties like storage facilities and industrial spaces. It tracks the MarketVector Quality REIT Index, prioritizing financially strong and well-managed REITs. Some of its top holdings include Public Storage and Equinix, both well-known names in the real estate sector. This ETF could appeal to investors looking for steady income through dividends and exposure to the real estate market. However, it’s important to note that its performance is closely tied to the real estate sector, which can be sensitive to economic changes.
How much will it cost me?The iREIT ETF has an expense ratio of 0.6%, meaning you’ll pay $6 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is higher than average because it is actively managed, focusing on high-quality REITs with strong financial health and operational efficiency.
What would affect this ETF?The iREIT ETF, focused on high-quality U.S. REITs, could benefit from a strong real estate market, rising demand for income-generating assets, and favorable economic conditions like low interest rates, which make borrowing cheaper for REITs. However, it may face challenges from rising interest rates, which can increase borrowing costs and reduce investor demand for income-focused investments, as well as potential regulatory changes or economic downturns that negatively impact property values and rental income.

IRET Top 10 Holdings

The iREIT ETF is heavily concentrated in the U.S. real estate sector, with a focus on high-quality REITs. Rexford Industrial Realty is a rising star, benefiting from strong financial performance and robust earnings, while Eastgroup Properties and First Industrial Realty are steady contributors, supported by strategic growth and rental gains. On the flip side, Equinix and Equity Lifestyle are lagging, with valuation concerns and weak momentum holding them back. Overall, the fund’s positioning leans heavily into real estate, offering a mix of income and growth potential but facing challenges from a few underperforming names.
Name
Company Name
Weight %
Market Value
Market Cap
Yearly Gain
Overall Rating
Danaher3.80%$123.65K$152.13B-13.07%
75
Outperform
First Industrial Realty3.72%$121.15K$7.55B4.86%
68
Neutral
Eastgroup Properties3.66%$119.09K$9.31B1.94%
78
Outperform
Equinix3.64%$118.31K$83.07B-4.76%
79
Outperform
Terreno Realty3.48%$113.08K$5.90B-4.62%
70
Outperform
CareTrust REIT3.46%$112.43K$7.74B7.04%
79
Outperform
Equity Lifestyle3.42%$111.35K$12.26B-11.93%
69
Neutral
SBA Communications3.37%$109.52K$20.56B-15.12%
62
Neutral
Realty Income3.32%$108.00K$53.01B-1.53%
72
Outperform
Public Storage3.31%$107.85K$48.88B-13.93%
68
Neutral

IRET Technical Analysis

Technical Analysis Sentiment
Negative
Last Price
Price Trends
50DMA
19.10
Negative
100DMA
18.98
Negative
200DMA
18.92
Negative
Market Momentum
MACD
-0.05
Positive
RSI
37.72
Neutral
STOCH
6.48
Positive
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For IRET, the sentiment is Negative. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 19.07, equal to the 50-day MA of 19.10, and equal to the 200-day MA of 18.92, indicating a bearish trend. The MACD of -0.05 indicates Positive momentum. The RSI at 37.72 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 6.48 is Positive, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Negative sentiment for IRET.

IRET Peer Comparison

Comparison Results
Name
Price
Price Target
AUM
Expense Ratio
Overall Rating
$3.25M0.60%
70
Outperform
$47.85M0.75%
68
Neutral
$30.16M0.36%
68
Neutral
$12.36M0.35%
64
Neutral
$7.63M0.60%
62
Neutral
$3.36M0.90%
58
Neutral
Performance Comparison
Ticker
Company Name
Price
Change
% Change
IRET
iREIT - MarketVector Quality REIT Index ETF
18.65
-1.89
-9.20%
SRHR
SRH REIT Covered Call ETF
NURE
Nuveen Short-Term REIT ETF
RDOG
ALPS REIT Dividend Dogs ETF
HAUS
Home Appreciation U.S. REIT ETF
DVDN
Kingsbarn Dividend Opportunity ETF
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.

Disclaimer

This AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents
Advertisement