GSJY - ETF AI Analysis
Top Page
Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Japan Equity ETF (GSJY)
Rating:71Outperform
Price Target:―
Positive Factors
Strong Year-To-Date Performance
The ETF has delivered strong gains so far this year, suggesting its strategy has worked well in the recent market environment.
Leading Japanese Companies in Top Holdings
Many of the largest positions, including major financial and technology firms, have shown strong performance, helping support the fund’s overall returns.
Broad Sector Diversification Within Japan
Holdings spread across industries like industrials, financials, technology, and consumer sectors help reduce the impact of weakness in any single part of the Japanese market.
Negative Factors
Short-Term Performance Weakness
The ETF has seen slightly negative performance over the past month, indicating some recent volatility or pullback.
Heavy Concentration in Japan
With most assets invested in Japanese companies and only a small U.S. exposure, investors are highly exposed to Japan-specific economic and market risks.
Mixed Results Among Top Holdings
A few major positions, including well-known industrial and consumer names, have shown weaker or lagging performance, which can drag on the fund’s returns.
GSJY vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)
AUM100.96M
RegionAsia-Pacific
Expense Ratio0.25%
Beta0.90
IssuerGoldman Sachs
Inception DateMar 02, 2016
Dividend Yield1.9%
Asset ClassEquity
Index TrackedGoldman Sachs ActiveBeta Japan Equity
Share Statistics
EPS (TTM)N/A
Shares OutstandingN/A
10 Day Avg. Volume3,907
30 Day Avg. Volume8,515
Financial Highlights & Ratios
PEG RatioN/A
Price to Book (P/B)N/A
Price to Sales (P/S)N/A
P/FCF RatioN/A
Enterprise Value/Market CapN/A
Enterprise Value/RevenueN/A
Enterprise Value/Gross ProfitN/A
Enterprise Value/EbitdaN/A
Forecast
1Y Price Target
67.95Price Target Upside― Downside
Rating ConsensusModerate Buy
Number of Analyst Covering160
EPS Forecast (FY)N/A
Revenue Forecast (FY)N/A
GSJY Summary
GSJY is the Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Japan Equity ETF, built to follow the Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Japan Equity index and give broad exposure to Japanese stocks. It owns many types of companies, including banks, industrial firms, and tech names. Well-known holdings include Toyota Motor and Sony. Investors might consider GSJY to diversify into Japan’s economy and seek long-term growth across different sectors instead of picking individual Japanese stocks. A key risk is that the fund is heavily tied to the Japanese stock market, so its value can go up or down with Japan’s economy and market swings.
How much will it cost me?The Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Japan Equity ETF (GSJY) has an expense ratio of 0.25%, meaning you’ll pay $2.50 per year for every $1,000 invested. This cost is slightly higher than average for ETFs because it is actively managed, using a sophisticated strategy to optimize returns by balancing factors like value, momentum, and quality.
What would affect this ETF?The Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Japan Equity ETF could benefit from Japan's strong industrial and technology sectors, especially if global demand for innovation and manufacturing remains high. However, economic challenges such as rising interest rates or slower growth in Japan's economy could negatively impact its financial and consumer cyclical holdings. Regulatory changes or geopolitical tensions in the Asia-Pacific region may also influence the ETF's performance.
GSJY Top 10 Holdings
GSJY leans heavily into Japan’s financial backbone, with Mitsubishi UFJ, Sumitomo Mitsui, and Mizuho acting as key engines of performance thanks to generally rising trends this year, even if short-term moves have been a bit choppy. On the growth side, chip-testing specialist Advantest and equipment maker Tokyo Electron give the fund a clear technology tilt, though their recent swings have made returns more mixed. Toyota and Sony, by contrast, have been losing some steam, modestly dragging on results. Overall, this is a Japan-focused, sector-diversified play with financials and tech in the driver’s seat.
Name | Company Name | Weight % | Market Value | Market Cap | Yearly Gain | Overall Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group | 4.49% | $4.48M | ¥41.37T | 49.06% | 76 Outperform | |
| Advantest | 3.64% | $3.64M | ¥23.90T | 188.07% | 75 Outperform | |
| Tokyo Electron | 3.22% | $3.21M | ¥27.49T | 116.46% | 73 Outperform | |
| Hitachi,Ltd. | 2.79% | $2.79M | ¥24.82T | 25.80% | 77 Outperform | |
| Toyota Motor | 2.73% | $2.72M | ¥34.58T | 3.48% | 80 Outperform | |
| Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group | 2.68% | $2.68M | ¥26.35T | 65.90% | 77 Outperform | |
| Recruit Holdings Co | 2.54% | $2.54M | ¥22.80T | 106.28% | 67 Neutral | |
| Mizuho Financial Group | 2.36% | $2.36M | ¥21.59T | 67.42% | 77 Outperform | |
| Sony | 2.31% | $2.30M | ¥22.27T | -16.41% | 73 Outperform | |
| SoftBank Group | 2.11% | $2.11M | ¥36.71T | 30.12% | 64 Neutral |
GSJY Technical Analysis
Positive
―
Price Trends
54.79
Positive
53.42
Positive
51.39
Positive
Market Momentum
0.27
Positive
57.45
Neutral
66.46
Neutral
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For GSJY, the sentiment is Positive. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 55.79, equal to the 50-day MA of 54.79, and equal to the 200-day MA of 51.39, indicating a bullish trend. The MACD of 0.27 indicates Positive momentum. The RSI at 57.45 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 66.46 is Neutral, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Positive sentiment for GSJY.
GSJY Peer Comparison
Comparison Results
Performance Comparison
GSJY
Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Japan Equity ETF
56.46
10.95
24.06%
DBJP
Xtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF
―
―
―
OPPJ
WisdomTree Japan Opportunities Fund
―
―
―
FJP
First Trust Japan AlphaDEX Fund
―
―
―
FLJH
Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF
―
―
―
JPXN
iShares Japan Large-Cap
―
―
―
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
DisclaimerThis AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents