TipRanks
Advertisement

GQQQ - ETF AI Analysis

Compare

Top Page

GQQQ

Astoria US Quality Growth Kings ETF (GQQQ)

Rating:75Outperform
Price Target:―
GQQQ, the Astoria US Quality Growth Kings ETF, earns a solid overall rating thanks to its heavy exposure to high-quality tech leaders like Apple, Microsoft, and Alphabet, all of which show strong financial performance, profitability, and long-term growth potential in areas such as AI, cloud, and services. However, several major holdings including Nvidia, Amazon, AMD, and Meta face risks from high valuations, mixed or bearish technical signals, and issues like cash flow management or regulatory concerns. The main risk factor for GQQQ is its concentration in large US technology and AI-focused companies, which can make the fund more sensitive to sector downturns and shifts in sentiment toward high-growth, premium-priced stocks.
Positive Factors
Strong Year-to-Date Results
The ETF has delivered strong gains so far this year, showing solid recent performance for investors.
High-Quality Growth Leaders
Many of the top holdings, especially in technology and communication services, have shown strong or steady performance, helping drive the fund’s returns.
Broad Sector Diversification Within the U.S.
Holdings spread across technology, consumer, health care, financials, and other sectors help reduce the impact if any single industry struggles.
Negative Factors
Heavy Tilt Toward Technology
A large share of the portfolio is in technology stocks, which can make the fund more sensitive to swings in that sector.
Concentration in a Few Mega-Cap Names
A small group of large companies makes up a meaningful portion of the ETF, increasing the risk if any of these big holdings stumble.
Higher Expense Ratio Than Some Core ETFs
The fund’s fee is higher than many broad U.S. index ETFs, which can slightly reduce long-term returns compared with lower-cost options.

GQQQ vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)

GQQQ Summary

Astoria US Quality Growth Kings ETF (GQQQ) is a U.S. stock fund that focuses on “quality growth” companies rather than tracking a specific index. It mainly invests in large, well-known businesses with strong earnings and solid finances, especially in technology and communication services. Top holdings include Apple and Nvidia, along with other major tech names. Someone might invest in GQQQ to seek long-term growth and get diversified exposure to many leading U.S. companies in one fund. A key risk is that it leans heavily toward tech and growth stocks, so its price can rise and fall more than the overall market.
How much will it cost me?The Astoria US Quality Growth Kings ETF (GQQQ) has an expense ratio of 0.35%, which means you’ll pay $3.50 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is slightly higher than average because it is actively managed, focusing on selecting high-quality growth companies rather than tracking a broad index. The higher cost reflects the effort to identify and invest in companies with strong growth potential.
What would affect this ETF?The GQQQ ETF, with its strong focus on U.S. growth-oriented sectors like technology and communication services, could benefit from continued innovation and demand for digital solutions, as well as economic recovery boosting consumer spending. However, it may face challenges from rising interest rates, which can negatively impact growth stocks, and regulatory scrutiny on major tech companies, which are among its top holdings. Broader economic slowdowns or geopolitical tensions could also affect its performance.

GQQQ Top 10 Holdings

GQQQ is leaning heavily on U.S. Big Tech and chip leaders, with Nvidia, Apple, and AMD doing much of the heavy lifting as their AI and hardware stories keep rising. Microsoft and Meta are also adding fuel, though Microsoft’s recent trading has been more mixed. On the other side, Amazon and Broadcom have been a bit sluggish, occasionally acting like sandbags on an otherwise fast-moving boat. Overall, this is a tech- and semiconductor-centric, U.S.-only growth play, where a handful of mega-cap names largely set the tone for performance.
Name
Company Name
Weight %
Market Value
Market Cap
Yearly Gain
Overall Rating
Nvidia8.57%$14.86M$5.64T24.69%
76
Outperform
Apple7.95%$13.79M$4.87T29.33%
79
Outperform
Microsoft5.68%$9.85M$3.84T0.03%
79
Outperform
Micron4.05%$7.02M$1.21T472.27%
79
Outperform
Amazon4.03%$6.99M$2.71T14.58%
71
Outperform
Alphabet Class A3.48%$6.03M$4.18T40.00%
85
Outperform
Advanced Micro Devices3.09%$5.36M$1.03T284.96%
73
Outperform
Broadcom3.07%$5.33M$1.70T4.96%
76
Outperform
Meta Platforms2.85%$4.94M$1.85T2.46%
76
Outperform
Alphabet Class C2.54%$4.40M$4.18T38.10%
82
Outperform

GQQQ Technical Analysis

Technical Analysis Sentiment
Positive
Last Price―
Price Trends
50DMA
35.64
Positive
100DMA
35.51
Positive
200DMA
33.12
Positive
Market Momentum
MACD
0.23
Negative
RSI
62.59
Neutral
STOCH
66.42
Neutral
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For GQQQ, the sentiment is Positive. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 35.85, equal to the 50-day MA of 35.64, and equal to the 200-day MA of 33.12, indicating a bullish trend. The MACD of 0.23 indicates Negative momentum. The RSI at 62.59 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 66.42 is Neutral, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Positive sentiment for GQQQ.

GQQQ Peer Comparison

Comparison Results
Name
Price
Price Target
AUM
Expense Ratio
Overall Rating
――$176.54M0.35%
75
Outperform
――$911.23M0.59%
75
Outperform
――$606.55M0.61%
75
Outperform
――$578.92M0.49%
71
Outperform
――$513.73M0.61%
72
Outperform
――$429.38M0.45%
71
Outperform
Performance Comparison
Ticker
Company Name
Price
Change
% Change
GQQQ
Astoria US Quality Growth Kings ETF
36.64
7.17
24.33%
LSGR
Natixis Loomis Sayles Focused Growth ETF
―
―
―
RJCA
RJ ClariVest Capital Appreciation ETF
―
―
―
GQGU
GQG US Equity ETF
―
―
―
BASG
Brown Advisory Sustainable Growth ETF
―
―
―
FDG
American Century Focused Dynamic Growth ETF
―
―
―
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
DisclaimerThis AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents
Advertisement