Fidelity Quality Factor ETF
FQAL - ETF AI Analysis
Top Page
Fidelity Quality Factor ETF (FQAL)
FQAL’s rating reflects a portfolio led by high-quality tech giants like Apple, Microsoft, Alphabet, Nvidia, and Micron, whose strong financial performance, growth in AI and cloud, and generally positive technical outlook provide a solid foundation for the fund. The rating is held back somewhat by holdings such as Meta, Visa, Eli Lilly, and JPMorgan, where high valuations, mixed technical signals, leverage, and credit or cash flow risks introduce more uncertainty. The main risk factor is the fund’s heavy concentration in large technology and AI-related companies, which can increase volatility if that sector faces a downturn.
FQAL vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)
- AUM
- 1.69B
- Region
- North America
- Expense Ratio
- 0.15%
- Beta
- 0.90
- Issuer
- Fidelity
- Inception Date
- Sep 12, 2016
- Dividend Yield
- 1.16%
- Asset Class
- Equity
- Index Tracked
- Fidelity U.S. Quality Factor Index
FQAL Summary
Fidelity Quality Factor ETF (FQAL) is a U.S. stock fund that follows the Fidelity U.S. Quality Factor Index, focusing on large, financially strong companies. It mainly holds American businesses across many sectors, with a big tilt toward technology. Well-known holdings include Apple, Nvidia, Microsoft, and Alphabet (Google’s parent company). Someone might invest in FQAL to seek long-term growth from high-quality companies while still getting broad diversification across the market. A key risk is that it is heavily invested in U.S. stocks and tech, so its value can rise and fall sharply with market and technology sector swings.
How much will it cost me?
This ETF has an expense ratio of 0.15%, which means you’ll pay about $1.50 per year for every $1,000 invested. That’s slightly below the average stock ETF fee, especially for a factor-based (rules-driven) strategy like this, so you’re getting a relatively low-cost way to target higher-quality companies.
What would affect this ETF?
FQAL is heavily invested in large U.S. technology and other high-quality companies like Nvidia, Apple, and Microsoft, so it could benefit if innovation, corporate profits, and the overall U.S. economy stay strong. On the downside, rising interest rates, tighter regulations on big tech or banks, or a broad market downturn could hurt these sectors and reduce the ETF’s performance.
FQAL Top 10 Holdings
FQAL is leaning heavily on Big Tech, with Apple and Microsoft quietly powering the fund as their shares keep rising on the back of strong cash flows and steady demand. Nvidia, a major holding, has lost a bit of steam lately, but its longer-term climb in AI chips still supports the portfolio. Alphabet and Meta have been more of a mixed bag, recently lagging and acting as a brake on performance. Micron adds a high-octane semiconductor tilt, while Eli Lilly’s steady strength shows this U.S.-focused fund isn’t all about tech fireworks.
| Name | Company Name | Weight % | Market Value | Market Cap | Yearly Gain | Overall Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 AAPL | Apple | 8.09% | $138.71M | $5.17T | 29.77% | 79Outperform |
 NVDA | Nvidia | 6.44% | $110.31M | $4.19T | -14.25% | 76Outperform |
 MSFT | Microsoft | 6.13% | $105.13M | $3.87T | 2.32% | 79Outperform |
 GOOGL | Alphabet Class A | 4.47% | $76.66M | $3.57T | 4.18% | 85Outperform |
 AVGO | Broadcom | 2.85% | $48.82M | $1.65T | 2.57% | 76Outperform |
 META | Meta Platforms | 2.10% | $35.93M | $1.61T | 2.40% | 76Outperform |
 LLY | Eli Lilly & Co | 2.03% | $34.77M | $1.35T | 40.23% | 72Outperform |
 JPM | JPMorgan Chase | 1.86% | $31.95M | $911.91B | 6.99% | 72Outperform |
 V | Visa | 1.67% | $28.70M | $789.13B | 24.03% | 70Outperform |
 MU | Micron | 1.91% | $32.70M | $917.92B | 226.03% | 79Outperform |
FQAL Technical Analysis
Price Trends
Market Momentum
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For FQAL, the sentiment is Positive. The current price of 83.48 is below the 20-day moving average (MA) of 83.84, below the 50-day MA of 83.92, and above the 200-day MA of 80.03, indicating a neutral trend. The MACD of -0.30 indicates Positive momentum. The RSI at 48.54 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 56.41 is Neutral, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Positive sentiment for FQAL.
FQAL Peer Comparison
Comparison Results
| Name | Price | Price Target | AUM | Expense Ratio | Overall Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FQAL | $83.48 | $91.00(9.01% Upside) | $1.69B | 0.15% | 74Outperform |
 BBUS | $136.50 | $166.09(21.68% Upside) | $9.75B | 0.02% | 73Outperform |
 QLTY | $44.31 | $52.47(18.42% Upside) | $7.42B | 0.50% | 75Outperform |
 DSI | $140.85 | $174.27(23.73% Upside) | $5.31B | 0.25% | 74Outperform |
 AKRE | $60.11 | $70.98(18.08% Upside) | $4.95B | 0.98% | 68Neutral |
 VTHR | $333.76 | $420.23(25.91% Upside) | $4.89B | 0.06% | 73Outperform |
Performance Comparison
| Show on chart | Ticker | Company Name | Price | Change | % Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FQAL | Fidelity Quality Factor ETF | 83.48 | 10.69 | 14.69% | |
| BBUS | JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF | 136.50 | 17.28 | 14.49% | |
| QLTY | GMO U.S. Quality ETF | 44.31 | 7.77 | 21.27% | |
| DSI | iShares MSCI KLD 400 Social ETF | 140.85 | 16.21 | 13.01% | |
| AKRE | Akre Focus ETF | 60.11 | -2.24 | -3.59% | |
| VTHR | Vanguard Russell 3000 ETF | 333.76 | 44.48 | 15.38% |
This AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.