tiprankstipranks
Advertisement

FPAG - ETF AI Analysis

Compare

Top Page

FPAG

FPA Global Equity ETF (FPAG)

Rating:60Neutral
Price Target:
FPAG, the FPA Global Equity ETF, has a solid overall rating, largely supported by strong, high-quality holdings like Alphabet (GOOG), Meta (META), and Amazon (AMZN), which benefit from robust financial performance, growth in AI and cloud services, and positive earnings momentum. Additional support comes from companies such as Heineken Holding, which adds stability through efficient operations and strong cash flow, while weaker names like IFF, with profitability challenges and valuation concerns, slightly weigh on the fund. The main risk factor is the ETF’s meaningful exposure to a handful of large, growth-oriented tech and consumer names, which can increase volatility if market sentiment toward these sectors shifts.
Positive Factors
Solid Recent Performance
The ETF has delivered strong gains so far this year and in recent months, showing positive momentum for investors.
Global Diversification
Holdings spread across the U.S., Europe, and Asia help reduce the risk of being tied to the fortunes of a single country.
Strong Top Contributors
Several major holdings, including Alphabet, Analog Devices, Heineken, Citigroup, and others, have shown strong or steady performance, supporting the fund’s overall results.
Negative Factors
Heavy U.S. Exposure
With a large majority of assets in U.S. companies, the fund is still heavily influenced by the U.S. market despite its global label.
Concentrated Top Holdings
A meaningful share of the portfolio sits in a small group of stocks, which can increase the impact if any of these companies run into trouble.
Mixed Performance Among Leaders
Some key positions, such as Meta Platforms and Arthur J Gallagher, have shown weaker recent performance, which could weigh on future returns if the trend continues.

FPAG vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)

FPAG Summary

FPA Global Equity ETF (FPAG) is an actively managed fund that invests in stocks from around the world, with most holdings in the U.S. It follows a global value theme, aiming to find companies that appear undervalued but have room to grow. The fund owns well-known names like Alphabet (Google), Amazon, and Meta, along with international companies such as Heineken. Investors might consider FPAG for broad global diversification with a focus on long-term growth from value stocks. A key risk is that stock prices can go up and down with the overall market, and value stocks can stay out of favor for long periods.
How much will it cost me?The FPA Global Equity ETF (FPAG) has an expense ratio of 0.49%, which means you’ll pay $4.90 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is slightly higher than average because the fund is actively managed, focusing on identifying undervalued stocks globally to deliver potential long-term returns.
What would affect this ETF?The FPA Global Equity ETF (FPAG) could benefit from global economic growth and increased demand for undervalued stocks, particularly in sectors like Communication Services and Technology, which make up a significant portion of its portfolio. However, it may face challenges from rising interest rates, which can negatively impact equity valuations, and sector-specific risks such as regulatory changes affecting major holdings like Meta Platforms and Alphabet. Additionally, global economic uncertainty or geopolitical tensions could influence its performance due to its broad geographic exposure.

FPAG Top 10 Holdings

FPAG’s story is driven by a barbell of global tech and steady value names. Alphabet and Amazon are doing much of the heavy lifting, with rising results this month even after some choppy stretches, while Analog Devices adds a semiconductor tilt that’s been strong over the year but recently mixed. On the value side, Citigroup has been quietly climbing, and Becton Dickinson is turning in steadier, defensive health-care performance. Meta, however, has been losing steam this year, acting as a drag. Overall, it’s a global, tech-leaning value mix rather than a pure Big Tech bet.
Name
Company Name
Weight %
Market Value
Market Cap
Yearly Gain
Overall Rating
Alphabet Class C3.95%$24.47M$4.12T42.58%
82
Outperform
International Flavors & Fragrances3.73%$23.10M$22.03B30.77%
61
Neutral
Heineken Holding NV3.35%$20.74M€18.95B15.50%
76
Outperform
Citigroup3.35%$20.73M$231.02B44.36%
68
Neutral
3.34%$20.68M
Analog Devices3.32%$20.59M$175.53B46.62%
78
Outperform
Meta Platforms3.18%$19.72M$1.57T-18.03%
76
Outperform
Becton Dickinson3.11%$19.23M$50.32B-3.98%
67
Neutral
Amazon2.85%$17.66M$2.79T11.27%
71
Outperform
Arthur J Gallagher & Co2.84%$17.57M$67.33B-12.20%
69
Neutral

FPAG Technical Analysis

Technical Analysis Sentiment
Positive
Last Price
Price Trends
50DMA
41.63
Positive
100DMA
40.43
Positive
200DMA
38.98
Positive
Market Momentum
MACD
0.26
Positive
RSI
54.98
Neutral
STOCH
54.47
Neutral
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For FPAG, the sentiment is Positive. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 42.67, equal to the 50-day MA of 41.63, and equal to the 200-day MA of 38.98, indicating a neutral trend. The MACD of 0.26 indicates Positive momentum. The RSI at 54.98 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 54.47 is Neutral, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Positive sentiment for FPAG.

FPAG Peer Comparison

Comparison Results
Name
Price
Price Target
AUM
Expense Ratio
Overall Rating
$620.81M0.49%
60
Neutral
$694.67M0.60%
68
Neutral
$603.88M0.44%
71
Outperform
$536.08M0.70%
58
Neutral
$181.66M0.35%
71
Outperform
$148.33M0.33%
70
Neutral
Performance Comparison
Ticker
Company Name
Price
Change
% Change
FPAG
FPA Global Equity ETF
42.64
7.10
19.98%
GMOI
GMO International Value ETF
MFSV
MFS Active Value ETF
BINV
Brandes International ETF
CSTK
Invesco Comstock Contrarian Equity ETF
PJFV
PGIM Jennison Focused Value ETF
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
DisclaimerThis AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents
Advertisement