FDIQ - ETF AI Analysis
Top Page
Invesco Bloomberg Financial Data Providers ETF (FDIQ)
Rating:72Outperform
Price Target:―
Positive Factors
Solid Recent Performance
The ETF has delivered strong gains so far this year and over the past few months, showing positive momentum.
Global Diversification
Holdings spread across the U.S., Europe, and Asia help reduce the impact of weakness in any single country.
Focused Exposure to Financial Data Leaders
The fund concentrates on established financial data and market infrastructure companies, which can benefit from steady demand for financial information and services.
Negative Factors
High Sector Concentration
With most assets in the financial sector, the ETF is vulnerable to downturns affecting financial companies.
Mixed Performance Among Top Holdings
Several of the largest positions have shown weak or negative performance this year, which could drag on future returns if the trend continues.
Moderate Expense Ratio
The fund’s fees are not especially low compared with some broad market ETFs, which slightly reduces net returns over time.
FDIQ vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)
AUM47.08M
RegionDeveloped Markets
Expense Ratio0.35%
Beta0.98
IssuerInvesco
Inception DateNov 01, 2011
Dividend Yield2.43%
Asset ClassEquity
Index TrackedBloomberg Financial Data Providers Index - Benchmark TR Gross
Share Statistics
EPS (TTM)N/A
Shares OutstandingN/A
10 Day Avg. Volume1,566
30 Day Avg. Volume4,068
Financial Highlights & Ratios
PEG RatioN/A
Price to Book (P/B)N/A
Price to Sales (P/S)N/A
P/FCF RatioN/A
Enterprise Value/Market CapN/A
Enterprise Value/RevenueN/A
Enterprise Value/Gross ProfitN/A
Enterprise Value/EbitdaN/A
Forecast
1Y Price Target
84.86Price Target Upside― Downside
Rating ConsensusModerate Buy
Number of Analyst Covering34
EPS Forecast (FY)N/A
Revenue Forecast (FY)N/A
FDIQ Summary
The Invesco Bloomberg Financial Data Providers ETF (FDIQ) tracks the Bloomberg Financial Data Providers Index, focusing on companies that run stock exchanges, provide financial data, and offer analytics used by banks and investors. Well-known holdings include S&P Global and Moody’s, which supply credit ratings and market data worldwide. Someone might invest in this ETF to gain growth potential from the rising demand for financial information and to diversify across many leading data and exchange businesses in the U.S. and abroad. A key risk is that it is heavily tied to the financial sector, so it can go up or down with changes in financial markets and regulation.
How much will it cost me?The Invesco KBW Regional Banking ETF (KBWR) has an expense ratio of 0.35%, which means you’ll pay $3.50 per year for every $1,000 invested. This expense ratio is slightly higher than average because the fund is focused on a specific niche—regional banks—and requires more active management compared to broad-market index ETFs. It’s a reasonable cost for investors seeking targeted exposure to this sector.
What would affect this ETF?The KBWR ETF, focused on U.S. regional banks, could benefit from economic growth in local communities, increased lending activity, and favorable interest rate environments that boost bank profitability. However, it may face challenges from rising interest rates, regulatory changes, or economic slowdowns that could impact loan demand and credit quality. Additionally, its heavy reliance on the financial sector makes it vulnerable to sector-specific risks.
FDIQ Top 10 Holdings
This ETF is tightly focused on financial data powerhouses, with names like MSCI and Moody’s setting the tone. Both have been relatively steady, helping to cushion the blow from weaker spots. Fair Isaac, once a star, has been losing steam this year and is now dragging on returns, while Experian, Verisk, and S&P Global have also been lagging, suggesting the whole data-and-ratings theme is catching its breath. With holdings spread across the U.S., Europe, and Asia, investors are getting a global play on financial infrastructure, but with clear concentration in a handful of big, fee-driven franchises.
Name | Company Name | Weight % | Market Value | Market Cap | Yearly Gain | Overall Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MSCI | 5.10% | $2.41M | $42.31B | 4.64% | 62 Neutral | |
| Fair Isaac | 5.03% | $2.38M | $25.43B | -42.01% | 69 Neutral | |
| Moody's | 4.91% | $2.32M | $78.73B | -6.08% | 77 Outperform | |
| Experian | 4.68% | $2.21M | £22.65B | -34.71% | 75 Outperform | |
| Verisk Analytics | 4.68% | $2.21M | $22.77B | -45.21% | 71 Outperform | |
| Nasdaq | 4.53% | $2.14M | $46.51B | -4.75% | 78 Outperform | |
| Deutsche Boerse | 4.52% | $2.13M | €43.88B | -10.89% | 76 Outperform | |
| Hong Kong Exchanges & Clearing | 4.50% | $2.12M | HK$474.28B | -5.90% | 69 Neutral | |
| S&P Global | 4.49% | $2.12M | $121.63B | -20.83% | 73 Outperform | |
| London Stock Exchange | 4.42% | $2.09M | £41.19B | -23.07% | 70 Outperform |
FDIQ Technical Analysis
Negative
―
Price Trends
68.95
Negative
69.30
Negative
64.93
Negative
Market Momentum
-1.44
Positive
30.80
Neutral
9.63
Positive
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For FDIQ, the sentiment is Negative. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 66.69, equal to the 50-day MA of 68.95, and equal to the 200-day MA of 64.93, indicating a bearish trend. The MACD of -1.44 indicates Positive momentum. The RSI at 30.80 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 9.63 is Positive, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Negative sentiment for FDIQ.
FDIQ Peer Comparison
Comparison Results
Performance Comparison
FDIQ
Invesco Bloomberg Financial Data Providers ETF
63.64
7.19
12.74%
WCBR
WisdomTree Cybersecurity Fund
―
―
―
AGNG
Global X Aging Population ETF
―
―
―
WISE
Themes Generative Artificial Intelligence ETF
―
―
―
IVEP
Dan IVES Wedbush AI Power & Infrastructure ETF
―
―
―
FOWF
Pacer Solactive Whitney Future of Warfare ETF
―
―
―
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
DisclaimerThis AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents