TipRanks
Advertisement

FDIQ - ETF AI Analysis

Compare

Top Page

FDIQ

Invesco Bloomberg Financial Data Providers ETF (FDIQ)

Rating:73Outperform
Price Target:―
FDIQ’s rating suggests it is a solid-quality ETF focused on financial data providers, supported by strong, profitable companies like Intercontinental Exchange and Nasdaq, whose growth initiatives and use of technology help lift the fund’s overall appeal. However, holdings such as Coinbase and Hong Kong Exchanges show weaker technical trends, higher valuation concerns, and cash flow or expense risks, which may weigh on the rating. The main risk is that many holdings share similar valuation and technical pressures in the same financial data and exchange-services niche, which can increase sensitivity to sector-specific downturns.
Positive Factors
Strong Overall Year-to-Date Performance
The fund has delivered strong gains so far this year, showing that its strategy has recently worked well for investors.
Global Diversification
Holdings spread across the U.S., Europe, and Asia help reduce the impact of problems in any single country or region.
Focused Exposure to Financial Data Leaders
The ETF concentrates on well-known exchanges and data providers, giving investors targeted access to a specialized corner of the financial sector.
Negative Factors
Heavy Concentration in Financials
With most assets in financial companies, the fund can be hit hard if the financial sector runs into trouble.
Weak Recent Performance in Many Top Holdings
Several of the largest positions have shown weak or negative performance this year, which could drag on future returns if the trend continues.
Moderate Expense Ratio
The fund’s fees are not especially low, so costs may eat into returns compared with cheaper ETFs.

FDIQ vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)

FDIQ Summary

FDIQ is the Invesco Bloomberg Financial Data Providers ETF. It follows the Bloomberg Financial Data Providers Index, focusing on companies that run stock exchanges, credit data, and financial analytics. Well-known holdings include Nasdaq and Coinbase, along with other global exchange and data firms. Investors might consider this ETF if they want growth potential from the increasing use of financial data and digital trading platforms, while getting diversification across several countries. A key risk is that it is heavily tied to the financial sector and market activity, so its value can go up and down sharply with changes in trading volumes and investor sentiment.
How much will it cost me?The Invesco KBW Regional Banking ETF (KBWR) has an expense ratio of 0.35%, which means you’ll pay $3.50 per year for every $1,000 invested. This expense ratio is slightly higher than average because the fund is focused on a specific niche—regional banks—and requires more active management compared to broad-market index ETFs. It’s a reasonable cost for investors seeking targeted exposure to this sector.
What would affect this ETF?The KBWR ETF, focused on U.S. regional banks, could benefit from economic growth in local communities, increased lending activity, and favorable interest rate environments that boost bank profitability. However, it may face challenges from rising interest rates, regulatory changes, or economic slowdowns that could impact loan demand and credit quality. Additionally, its heavy reliance on the financial sector makes it vulnerable to sector-specific risks.

FDIQ Top 10 Holdings

FDIQ is essentially a bet on the global market plumbing, with big exchange operators and data providers steering the ship. U.S. names like Cboe, ICE, CME, and Nasdaq have been generally rising, giving the fund a steady tailwind, while Deutsche Boerse and Singapore Exchange add strong developed-market exposure from Europe and Asia. On the flip side, credit bureaus Experian and Equifax look a bit tired, and Coinbase is dragging performance with more mixed trading sentiment. Overall, it’s a concentrated play on financial infrastructure across major developed markets.
Name
Company Name
Weight %
Market Value
Market Cap
Yearly Gain
Overall Rating
Coinbase Global5.29%$2.11M$53.05B-35.04%
68
Neutral
Intercontinental Exchange5.19%$2.07M$85.85B-6.19%
80
Outperform
CME Group4.99%$1.99M$96.08B0.07%
74
Outperform
Deutsche Boerse4.95%$1.98M€49.74B27.15%
76
Outperform
Nasdaq4.91%$1.96M$52.82B9.02%
78
Outperform
Cboe Global Markets4.72%$1.88M$27.87B9.66%
75
Outperform
Hong Kong Exchanges & Clearing4.60%$1.84MHK$502.88B-4.52%
69
Neutral
Experian4.35%$1.74M£23.57B-27.98%
75
Outperform
Moody's4.19%$1.67M$81.27B-1.13%
77
Outperform
London Stock Exchange4.15%$1.66M£39.30B0.14%
70
Outperform

FDIQ Technical Analysis

Technical Analysis Sentiment
Negative
Last Price―
Price Trends
50DMA
72.12
Negative
100DMA
69.92
Negative
200DMA
68.61
Positive
Market Momentum
MACD
-0.75
Positive
RSI
38.20
Neutral
STOCH
0.02
Positive
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For FDIQ, the sentiment is Negative. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 72.09, equal to the 50-day MA of 72.12, and equal to the 200-day MA of 68.61, indicating a neutral trend. The MACD of -0.75 indicates Positive momentum. The RSI at 38.20 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 0.02 is Positive, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Negative sentiment for FDIQ.

FDIQ Peer Comparison

Comparison Results
Name
Price
Price Target
AUM
Expense Ratio
Overall Rating
――$39.74M0.35%
73
Outperform
――$90.61M0.50%
64
Neutral
――$28.20M0.35%
57
Neutral
――$16.31M0.75%
70
Outperform
――$14.61M0.49%
70
Neutral
――$13.14M0.30%
66
Neutral
Performance Comparison
Ticker
Company Name
Price
Change
% Change
FDIQ
Invesco Bloomberg Financial Data Providers ETF
69.66
10.15
17.06%
AGNG
Global X Aging Population ETF
―
―
―
WISE
Themes Generative Artificial Intelligence ETF
―
―
―
IVEP
Dan IVES Wedbush AI Power & Infrastructure ETF
―
―
―
FOWF
Pacer Solactive Whitney Future of Warfare ETF
―
―
―
ERET
iShares Environmentally Aware Real Estate ETF
―
―
―
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
DisclaimerThis AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents
Advertisement