EFV - ETF AI Analysis
Top Page
iShares MSCI EAFE Value ETF (EFV)
Rating:67Neutral
Price Target:―
Positive Factors
Broad International Diversification
The fund spreads its investments across many developed countries like Japan, the UK, and several in Europe, which helps reduce reliance on any single market.
Strong Performance from Key Financial and Energy Holdings
Several of the largest positions in banks and energy companies have shown strong gains this year, supporting the ETF’s overall results.
Solid Recent Performance with Moderate Fees
The ETF has delivered steady gains over the past year-to-date and recent months while charging a mid-range expense ratio that is reasonable for a diversified international value fund.
Negative Factors
Heavy Tilt Toward Financials
A large share of the portfolio is in financial stocks, which can make the fund more sensitive to changes in interest rates and banking sector stress.
Limited Technology Exposure
The fund has only a small allocation to technology companies, so investors may miss out if tech stocks continue to lead global markets.
Mixed Results Among Top Holdings
While many top positions have performed well, at least one major holding has shown weak performance, which can drag on overall returns.
EFV vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)
AUM31.72B
RegionDeveloped Markets
Expense Ratio0.33%
Beta0.61
IssueriShares
Inception DateAug 01, 2005
Dividend Yield4.47%
Asset ClassEquity
Index TrackedMSCI EAFE Value
Share Statistics
EPS (TTM)N/A
Shares OutstandingN/A
10 Day Avg. Volume1,620,151
30 Day Avg. Volume3,545,089
Financial Highlights & Ratios
PEG RatioN/A
Price to Book (P/B)N/A
Price to Sales (P/S)N/A
P/FCF RatioN/A
Enterprise Value/Market CapN/A
Enterprise Value/RevenueN/A
Enterprise Value/Gross ProfitN/A
Enterprise Value/EbitdaN/A
Forecast
1Y Price Target
88.87Price Target Upside― Downside
Rating ConsensusModerate Buy
Number of Analyst Covering399
EPS Forecast (FY)N/A
Revenue Forecast (FY)N/A
EFV Summary
The iShares MSCI EAFE Value ETF (EFV) follows the MSCI EAFE Value Index, which focuses on “value” stocks in developed markets outside North America, such as Japan, the UK, and Europe. It holds well-known companies like Nestlé and Toyota, along with many large banks and energy firms. Someone might invest in EFV to diversify beyond the U.S. and to own international companies that appear relatively cheap, hoping they grow in value over time. A key risk is that these international value stocks can still fall in price and will move up and down with global markets.
How much will it cost me?The iShares MSCI EAFE Value ETF (EFV) has an expense ratio of 0.33%, which means you’ll pay $3.30 per year for every $1,000 invested. This cost is lower than average for actively managed funds but slightly higher than many passively managed ETFs, as it tracks a specific index focused on value stocks in developed markets outside North America.
What would affect this ETF?The iShares MSCI EAFE Value ETF (EFV) could benefit from economic recovery in developed markets outside North America, especially if value stocks gain favor during periods of market uncertainty or rising interest rates. However, challenges such as geopolitical tensions in Europe or Asia, regulatory changes, or slower growth in key sectors like financials and industrials could negatively impact its performance. The ETF's heavy exposure to financials and reliance on companies like HSBC and Roche also makes it sensitive to sector-specific risks and global economic conditions.
EFV Top 10 Holdings
EFV leans heavily on big international banks and energy giants, with names like HSBC, Mitsubishi UFJ, and BBVA doing much of the heavy lifting as their shares keep rising and support the fund’s value tilt. TotalEnergies and Shell add extra fuel, benefiting from steady-to-strong energy sentiment. On the defensive side, Nestlé has been lagging, and Toyota looks a bit stuck in neutral, which slightly offsets the gains. Overall, this is a developed-markets ex-U.S. play, anchored in financials and classic value sectors across Europe and Japan.
Name | Company Name | Weight % | Market Value | Market Cap | Yearly Gain | Overall Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HSBC Holdings | 3.11% | $983.75M | £262.38B | 61.44% | 80 Outperform | |
| Shell (UK) | 2.25% | $711.30M | £184.29B | 22.78% | 73 Outperform | |
| Nestlé SA | 2.21% | $699.40M | CHF202.23B | 3.37% | 71 Outperform | |
| Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group | 2.15% | $680.76M | ¥40.90T | 49.62% | 76 Outperform | |
| Roche Holding AG | 1.79% | $565.17M | $353.86B | 39.16% | 73 Outperform | |
| Allianz | 1.76% | $557.75M | €171.55B | 25.18% | 67 Neutral | |
| Toyota Motor | 1.64% | $516.70M | ¥36.90T | 8.46% | 80 Outperform | |
| Novartis AG | 1.61% | $509.02M | CHF226.51B | 22.32% | 80 Outperform | |
| TotalEnergies SE | 1.51% | $478.75M | €166.68B | 39.12% | 78 Outperform | |
| Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria | 1.45% | $457.10M | €139.39B | 64.40% | 76 Outperform |
EFV Technical Analysis
Positive
―
Price Trends
79.76
Positive
77.84
Positive
74.63
Positive
Market Momentum
0.56
Positive
54.95
Neutral
31.40
Neutral
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For EFV, the sentiment is Positive. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 81.82, equal to the 50-day MA of 79.76, and equal to the 200-day MA of 74.63, indicating a neutral trend. The MACD of 0.56 indicates Positive momentum. The RSI at 54.95 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 31.40 is Neutral, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Positive sentiment for EFV.
EFV Peer Comparison
Comparison Results
Performance Comparison
EFV
iShares MSCI EAFE Value ETF
81.60
18.33
28.97%
IEFA
iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF
―
―
―
EFA
iShares MSCI EAFE ETF
―
―
―
EFG
iShares MSCI EAFE Growth ETF
―
―
―
ESGD
iShares ESG Aware MSCI EAFE ETF
―
―
―
FENI
Fidelity Enhanced International ETF
―
―
―
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
DisclaimerThis AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents