tiprankstipranks
Advertisement

DFUV - ETF AI Analysis

Compare

Top Page

DFUV

Dimensional US Marketwide Value ETF (DFUV)

Rating:73Outperform
Price Target:
DFUV, the Dimensional US Marketwide Value ETF, earns a solid overall rating thanks to its heavy exposure to financially strong, well-established companies like Micron, Johnson & Johnson, and Cisco, which benefit from robust growth drivers and positive business momentum. The presence of more mixed names such as Berkshire Hathaway and Intel, where weaker technical trends or profitability and cash flow challenges are noted, slightly tempers the fund’s appeal. A key risk factor is the ETF’s concentration in large U.S. value-oriented stocks, which can make performance sensitive to shifts in the broader U.S. market and value investing cycles.
Positive Factors
Strong Recent Performance
The ETF has delivered strong gains so far this year, showing solid momentum for investors.
Broad Sector Diversification
Holdings are spread across many sectors like financials, health care, technology, industrials, and energy, which helps reduce the impact if one area of the market struggles.
Reasonable Expense Ratio
The fund’s expense ratio is relatively low for an actively managed value-focused ETF, allowing investors to keep more of their returns over time.
Negative Factors
Heavy U.S. Concentration
With almost all assets in U.S. companies, the fund offers very little geographic diversification and is highly tied to the U.S. market.
Value and Financials Tilt
A large weight in financial stocks and a value style focus may cause the ETF to lag when growth stocks or other sectors lead the market.
Some Top Holdings Are Lagging
A few major positions, such as Berkshire Hathaway, have shown weaker recent performance, which can drag on overall returns if that continues.

DFUV vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)

DFUV Summary

Dimensional US Marketwide Value ETF (DFUV) is a U.S.-focused fund that follows a value investing approach across the total stock market, aiming to buy companies that appear cheap based on fundamentals. It holds a wide mix of sectors like financials, health care, and energy, with well-known names such as JPMorgan Chase and Exxon Mobil among its top positions. Investors might consider DFUV for broad diversification and the potential long-term growth of undervalued stocks. A key risk is that value stocks can stay out of favor for long periods, so the share price can go up and down and may lag the overall market at times.
How much will it cost me?The Dimensional US Marketwide Value ETF (DFUV) has an expense ratio of 0.21%, meaning you’ll pay $2.10 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is lower than average for actively managed funds, as it uses a disciplined, research-driven approach to value investing while keeping costs relatively low.
What would affect this ETF?The Dimensional US Marketwide Value ETF (DFUV) could benefit from a recovery in undervalued sectors like Financials and Energy, especially if economic conditions improve or interest rates stabilize, which often supports value stocks. However, challenges such as prolonged economic uncertainty, regulatory changes affecting top holdings like JPMorgan Chase or Exxon Mobil, or weaker performance in sectors like Technology and Communication Services could negatively impact the fund's returns.

DFUV Top 10 Holdings

DFUV leans heavily into classic U.S. value names, with big banks and energy giants steering the ship. JPMorgan and Bank of America have been rising steadily, giving the fund a solid financial backbone, while Berkshire Hathaway has been more of a quiet passenger, offering stability but not much spark lately. In energy, Exxon and Chevron have been powering returns as the sector stays in favor. On the tech side, Micron and Cisco are the fund’s more adventurous bets, with Micron’s mixed recent moves contrasting with Cisco’s stronger, AI-tinged momentum. Overall, it’s a U.S.-focused value play with financials and energy doing most of the heavy lifting.
Name
Company Name
Weight %
Market Value
Market Cap
Yearly Gain
Overall Rating
JPMorgan Chase4.50%$693.65M$942.63B19.84%
72
Outperform
Amazon3.48%$535.32M$2.92T34.19%
71
Outperform
Exxon Mobil3.22%$496.57M$644.21B44.42%
74
Outperform
Johnson & Johnson2.87%$441.74M$617.78B48.74%
78
Outperform
Micron2.86%$440.84M$929.52B669.69%
79
Outperform
Berkshire Hathaway B2.73%$420.21M$992.60B11.77%
66
Neutral
Chevron2.00%$308.01M$392.01B27.90%
71
Outperform
Cisco Systems1.50%$231.48M$457.17B69.16%
77
Outperform
UnitedHealth1.42%$218.74M$376.34B72.36%
72
Outperform
Bank of America1.33%$204.73M$439.63B36.27%
72
Outperform

DFUV Technical Analysis

Technical Analysis Sentiment
Positive
Last Price
Price Trends
50DMA
54.59
Positive
100DMA
52.33
Positive
200DMA
49.59
Positive
Market Momentum
MACD
0.34
Negative
RSI
62.84
Neutral
STOCH
81.18
Negative
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For DFUV, the sentiment is Positive. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 55.16, equal to the 50-day MA of 54.59, and equal to the 200-day MA of 49.59, indicating a bullish trend. The MACD of 0.34 indicates Negative momentum. The RSI at 62.84 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 81.18 is Negative, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Positive sentiment for DFUV.

DFUV Peer Comparison

Comparison Results
Name
Price
Price Target
AUM
Expense Ratio
Overall Rating
$15.42B0.21%
73
Outperform
$47.70B0.17%
72
Outperform
$38.32B0.26%
74
Outperform
$37.44B0.33%
71
Outperform
$23.91B0.39%
68
Neutral
$20.74B0.09%
73
Outperform
Performance Comparison
Ticker
Company Name
Price
Change
% Change
DFUV
Dimensional US Marketwide Value ETF
56.70
14.91
35.68%
DFAC
Dimensional U.S. Core Equity 2 ETF
DYNF
BlackRock U.S. Equity Factor Rotation ETF
CGDV
Capital Group Dividend Value ETF
CGGR
Capital Group Growth ETF
DFUS
Dimensional U.S. Equity ETF
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
DisclaimerThis AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents
Advertisement