CZAR - ETF AI Analysis
Top Page
(undefined)
Rating:68Neutral
Price Target:―
Positive Factors
Strong Leading Holdings
Several of the largest positions, including major technology and defense names, have shown strong performance, helping support the ETF’s overall results.
Broad Sector Diversification
The fund spreads its assets across many sectors such as technology, financials, industrials, and health care, which can help reduce the impact if one area of the market struggles.
Global Geographic Exposure
While most assets are in the U.S., the ETF also invests across Europe, Canada, Japan, and other regions, adding some international diversification.
Negative Factors
Mixed Recent Performance
The ETF’s year-to-date and three-month returns have been slightly negative, showing that it has recently lagged despite a stronger one-month rebound.
Underperforming Financial Holdings
Some key financial stocks in the top holdings have shown weak or negative performance, which can drag on the fund’s overall returns.
Moderate Expense Ratio
The fund’s expense ratio is not especially low, meaning investors are paying a noticeable ongoing fee compared with some cheaper ETFs.
CZAR vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)
AUMN/A
RegionN/A
Expense RatioN/A
BetaN/A
IssuerN/A
Inception DateN/A
Dividend YieldN/A
Asset ClassN/A
Index TrackedN/A
Share Statistics
EPS (TTM)N/A
Shares OutstandingN/A
10 Day Avg. Volume163
30 Day Avg. Volume136
Financial Highlights & Ratios
PEG RatioN/A
Price to Book (P/B)N/A
Price to Sales (P/S)N/A
P/FCF RatioN/A
Enterprise Value/Market CapN/A
Enterprise Value/RevenueN/A
Enterprise Value/Gross ProfitN/A
Enterprise Value/EbitdaN/A
Forecast
1Y Price TargetN/A
Price Target UpsideN/A
Rating ConsensusN/A
Number of Analyst CoveringN/A
EPS Forecast (FY)N/A
Revenue Forecast (FY)N/A
CZAR Summary
CZAR, the Themes Natural Monopoly ETF, tracks the Solactive Natural Monopoly Index, focusing on companies that dominate their markets and are hard to compete with. It holds well-known names like Nvidia, Visa, Mastercard, Cisco, and BlackRock, spread mostly across the U.S. and several major countries. This ETF may appeal to investors looking for long-term growth and diversification through strong, established businesses with durable advantages. However, because it leans heavily toward technology and financial companies, its price can rise and fall sharply with those sectors and with overall stock market swings.
How much will it cost me?The Themes Natural Monopoly ETF (CZAR) has an expense ratio of 0.35%, meaning you’ll pay $3.50 per year for every $1,000 invested. This cost is slightly higher than average for ETFs because it is actively managed, focusing on a unique niche of companies with natural monopolies. Active management typically involves more research and oversight, which can increase costs.
What would affect this ETF?The CZAR ETF, with its focus on dominant companies in developed markets, could benefit from continued technological innovation and strong consumer demand in sectors like Technology and Industrials, which make up a significant portion of its portfolio. However, rising interest rates or stricter regulations in industries such as Financials or Technology could negatively impact growth prospects for some of its top holdings like Mastercard, Broadcom, or Meta Platforms. Global economic conditions and geopolitical tensions may also influence the performance of its diverse sector exposure.
CZAR Top 10 Holdings
CZAR leans heavily on tech and financial “tollbooths” that dominate their niches, mostly across developed markets. Cisco and Interactive Brokers have been rising and look like key engines for recent performance, while Nvidia is still a powerhouse but showing more mixed momentum as its AI story cools a bit. On the financial side, Visa and Mastercard are steady but not sprinting, and BlackRock has been somewhat lagging, taking a little shine off the fund. Overall, CZAR is concentrated in market gatekeepers rather than flashy growth names.
Name | Company Name | Weight % | Market Value | Market Cap | Yearly Gain | Overall Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BAE Systems | 5.18% | $83.88K | £59.34B | 14.07% | 61 Neutral | |
| Motorola Solutions | 4.87% | $78.83K | $73.09B | -0.43% | 70 Neutral | |
| Nvidia | 4.68% | $75.85K | $4.77T | 5.99% | 76 Outperform | |
| Cisco Systems | 4.65% | $75.27K | $455.55B | 64.74% | 77 Outperform | |
| LEGRAND | 4.23% | $68.54K | €33.79B | 0.82% | 70 Outperform | |
| CME Group | 3.79% | $61.29K | $93.49B | -4.43% | 74 Outperform | |
| BlackRock | 3.61% | $58.42K | $178.46B | -3.18% | 77 Outperform | |
| Interactive Brokers | 3.48% | $56.28K | $40.50B | 39.43% | 75 Outperform | |
| Mastercard | 3.48% | $56.27K | $497.24B | 0.75% | 75 Outperform | |
| Visa | 3.47% | $56.19K | $690.70B | 5.08% | 70 Outperform |
CZAR Technical Analysis
Positive
―
Price Trends
31.63
Positive
31.42
Positive
31.63
Positive
Market Momentum
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For CZAR, the sentiment is Positive. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 31.91, equal to the 50-day MA of 31.63, and equal to the 200-day MA of 31.63, indicating a bullish trend. The MACD of ― indicates undefined momentum. The RSI at ― is undefined, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of ― is undefined, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Positive sentiment for CZAR.
CZAR Peer Comparison
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
DisclaimerThis AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents