Stoneco (STNE) Risk Analysis

The trading market for our Class A common shares (including in the form of BDRs) and our other securities (issued or sponsored) will depend in part on the research and reports that securities or industry analysts publish about us or our business. If one or more of the analysts who cover us downgrade our Class A common shares and our other securities (issued or sponsored) or publish inaccurate or unfavorable research about our business, the price of our Class A common shares, BDRs and our other securities (issued or sponsored) would likely decline. If one or more of these analysts cease coverage of our company or fail to publish reports on us regularly, demand for our Class A common shares, BDRs and our other securities (issued or sponsored) could decrease, which might cause the price of our Class A common shares, BDRs and our other securities (issued or sponsored) and trading volume to decline.

We own less than 100% of the equity interests or assets of some of our subsidiaries and do not hold controlling interests in some of the entities in which we have invested. As a result, we do not receive the full amount of any profit or cash flow from these non-wholly owned entities and those who hold a controlling interest may be able to take actions that bind the respective entity. We may be adversely affected by this lack of full control and we cannot provide assurance that management of our subsidiaries or other entities will possess the skills, qualifications or abilities necessary to profitably operate such businesses.

S&P Dow Jones and FTSE Russell have recently announced changes to their eligibility criteria for inclusion of shares of public companies on certain indices, including the S&P 500, to exclude companies with multiple classes of shares and companies whose public shareholders hold no more than 5% of total voting power from being added to such indices. In addition, several shareholder advisory firms have announced their opposition to the use of multiple class structures. As a result, the dual class structure of our ordinary shares may prevent the inclusion of our common shares in such indices and may cause shareholder advisory firms to publish negative commentary about our corporate governance practices or otherwise seek to cause us to change our capital structure. Any such exclusion from indices could result in a less active trading market for our common shares. Any actions or publications by shareholder advisory firms critical of our corporate governance practices or capital structure could also adversely affect the value of our common shares.

Each Class A common share will entitle its holder to one vote per share on all matters submitted to a vote of our shareholders. Each holder of our Class B common shares will be entitled to 10 votes per Class B common share so long as the voting power of Class B common shares is at least 10% of the aggregate voting power of our outstanding common shares on the record date for any general meeting of the shareholders. The difference in voting rights could adversely affect the value of our Class A common shares by, for example, delaying or deferring a change of control or if investors view, or any potential future purchaser of our company views, the superior voting rights of the Class B common shares to have value. Because of the ten-to-one voting ratio between our Class B common shares and Class A common shares, the holders of our Class B common shares collectively possess a significant amount of voting power of our common shares. Future transfers by holders of Class B common shares will generally result in those shares converting to Class A common shares, subject to limited exceptions, such as certain transfers effected to permitted transferees or for estate planning or charitable purposes. The conversion of Class B common shares to Class A common shares will have the effect, over time, of increasing the relative voting power of those holders of Class B common shares who retain their shares in the long term. For a description of our dual class structure, see "Item 10. Additional Information-B. Memorandum and articles of association-Meetings of Shareholders-Voting Rights and Right to Demand a Poll."

We are a Cayman Islands exempted company with limited liability. Our corporate affairs are governed by our Articles of Association and by the laws of the Cayman Islands. The rights of shareholders and the responsibilities of members of our board of directors may be different from the rights of shareholders and responsibilities of directors in companies governed by the laws of U.S. jurisdictions. In the performance of its duties, the board of directors of a solvent Cayman Islands exempted company is required to consider our interests, and the interests of its shareholders as a whole, which may differ from the interests of one or more of its individual shareholders. See "Item 10. Additional Information-B. Memorandum and articles of association-Principal Differences between Cayman Islands Corporate Law and U.S. Corporate Law."

As a foreign private issuer, we are subject to different disclosure and other requirements than domestic U.S. registrants. For example, as a foreign private issuer, in the United States, we are not subject to the same disclosure requirements as a domestic U.S. registrant under the Exchange Act, including the requirements to prepare and issue quarterly reports on Form 10-Q or to file current reports on Form 8-K upon the occurrence of specified significant events, the proxy rules applicable to domestic U.S. registrants under Section 14 of the Exchange Act or the insider reporting and short-swing profit rules applicable to domestic U.S. registrants under Section 16 of the Exchange Act. In addition, we rely on exemptions from certain U.S. rules which permit us to follow Cayman Islands legal requirements rather than certain of the requirements that are applicable to U.S. domestic registrants. We follow Cayman Islands laws and regulations that are applicable to Cayman Islands companies. However, Cayman Islands laws and regulations applicable to Cayman Islands companies do not contain any provisions comparable to the U.S. proxy rules, the U.S. rules relating to the filing of reports on Form 10-Q or 8-K or the U.S. rules relating to liability for insiders who profit from trades made in a short period of time, as referred to above. Furthermore, foreign private issuers are required to file their annual report on Form 20-F within 120 days after the end of each fiscal year, while U.S. domestic issuers that are accelerated filers are required to file their annual report on Form 10-K within 75 days after the end of each fiscal year. Foreign private issuers are also exempt from Regulation Fair Disclosure, aimed at preventing issuers from making selective disclosures of material information, although we will be subject to Cayman Islands laws and regulations having substantially the same effect as Regulation Fair Disclosure. As a result of the above, even though we are required to file reports on Form 6-K disclosing the limited information which we have made or are required to make public pursuant to Cayman Islands law, or are required to distribute to shareholders generally, and that is material to us, you may not receive information of the same type or amount that is required to be disclosed to shareholders of a U.S. company. Moreover, we are not required to file periodic reports and financial statements with the SEC as frequently or within the same time frames as U.S. companies with securities registered under the Exchange Act. We currently prepare our financial statements in accordance with IFRS. We will not be required to file financial statements prepared in accordance with or reconciled to U.S. GAAP so long as our financial statements are prepared in accordance with IFRS as issued by the IASB. We are not required to comply with Regulation FD, which imposes restrictions on the selective disclosure of material information to shareholders. In addition, our officers, directors and principal shareholders are exempt from the reporting and short-swing profit recovery provisions of Section 16 of the Exchange Act and the rules under the Exchange Act with respect to their purchases and sales of our securities. We cannot predict if investors will find our Class A common shares less attractive because we will rely on these exemptions. If some investors find our Class A common shares less attractive as a result, there may be a less active trading market for our Class A common shares and our share price may be more volatile. See "Item 10. Additional Information-B. Memorandum and articles of association-Principal Differences between Cayman Islands and U.S. Corporate Law."

Subject to certain requirements, as a foreign private issuer, we are permitted to follow home country practice in lieu of certain Nasdaq corporate governance rules, which include rules relating to board independence, independent director oversight of executive compensation, nomination of directors and other corporate governance matters, such as the requirement that we obtain shareholder approval prior to an issuance of securities (in certain circumstances) in connection with certain events, or being required that a majority of board members be independent, or to have independent director oversight of executive compensation, the nomination of directors and corporate governance matters. To the extent Cayman Islands law does not require us to adopt these corporate governance standards, we are permitted and intend to follow home country practice in lieu of the above requirements. See "Item 10. Additional Information-B. Memorandum and Articles of Association-Principal Differences between Cayman Islands and U.S. Corporate Law-Corporate Governance."

In order to maintain our current status as a foreign private issuer, either (a) more than 50% of our outstanding voting securities must be either directly or indirectly owned of record by non-residents of the United States or (b) (i) a majority of our executive officers or directors may not be U.S. citizens or residents, (ii) more than 50% of our assets cannot be located in the United States and (iii) our business must be administered principally outside the United States. If we lose this status, we would be required to comply with the Exchange Act reporting and other requirements applicable to U.S. domestic issuers, which are more detailed and extensive than the requirements for foreign private issuers. We may also be required to make changes in our corporate governance practices in accordance with various SEC and Nasdaq rules. The regulatory and compliance costs to us under U.S. securities laws if we are required to comply with the reporting requirements applicable to a U.S. domestic issuer may be significantly higher than the costs we will incur as a foreign private issuer.

Our corporate affairs are governed by our Articles of Association, by the Companies Act (as revised) of the Cayman Islands, or "Cayman Companies Act," and the common law of the Cayman Islands. The rights of our shareholders and the fiduciary responsibilities of our directors under the laws of the Cayman Islands are not as established as they would be as under statutes or judicial precedent in some jurisdictions in the United States. Therefore, you may have more difficulty protecting your interests than would shareholders of a corporation incorporated in a jurisdiction in the United States, due to the comparatively less formal nature of Cayman Islands law in this area. While Cayman Islands law allows a dissenting shareholder to express the shareholder's view that a court-sanctioned reorganization of a Cayman Islands company would not provide fair value for the shareholder's shares, Cayman Islands statutory law does not specifically provide for shareholder appraisal rights in connection with a court sanctioned reorganization (by way of a scheme of arrangement). This may make it more difficult for you to assess the value of any consideration you may receive in such a merger or consolidation or to require that the acquirer gives you additional consideration if you believe the consideration offered is insufficient. However, Cayman Islands statutory law provides a mechanism for a dissenting shareholder in a statutory merger or consolidation to apply to the Grand Court of the Cayman Islands, or the "Grand Court" for a determination of the fair value of the dissenter's shares if it is not possible for the company and the dissenter to agree on a fair price within the time limits prescribed. Shareholders of Cayman Islands exempted companies (such as us) have no general rights under Cayman Islands law to inspect corporate records and accounts or to obtain copies of lists of shareholders. Our directors have discretion under our Articles of Association to determine whether or not, and under what conditions, our corporate records may be inspected by our shareholders, but are not obliged to make them available to our shareholders. This may make it more difficult for you to obtain information needed to establish any facts necessary for a shareholder motion or to solicit proxies from other shareholders in connection with a proxy contest.

We are a Cayman Islands exempted company and substantially all of our assets are located outside the United States. In addition, most of our directors and officers are Brazilian nationals and reside or are based in Brazil. A substantial portion of our assets and the assets of these persons are located in Brazil. As a result, it may be difficult to effect service of process upon us or these persons within the United States. A final conclusive judgment of a United States court for civil liabilities based upon the U.S. federal securities laws may only be enforced in Brazil if such judgment (i) fulfills all formalities required for its enforceability under the laws of the place/jurisdiction where the foreign judgment was issued; (ii) is issued by a competent court and/or authority in the jurisdiction where it was awarded after proper service of process is made on the parties, in accordance with the applicable law, considering that service of process on individuals in Brazil must comply with the Brazilian applicable law, or after sufficient evidence of the parties' absence has been given, as requested under the laws of the jurisdiction where the foreign judgment was entered; (iii) is not rendered in an action upon which Brazilian courts have exclusive jurisdiction; (iv) is final and binding and, therefore, not subject to appeal in the jurisdiction where it was issued; (v) does not conflict with a previous final and binding decision issued by a Brazilian on the case records of a lawsuit involving the same parties, cause of action and claim; (vi) is apostilled by the appropriate authority of the state rendering such foreign judgment, or is duly authenticated by the appropriate Brazilian consulate; (vii) is translated into Portuguese by a sworn translator in Brazil; and (viii) is not contrary to Brazilian national sovereignty, public policy or public morality. Therefore, it may be difficult to enforce in judgments obtained in U.S. courts based on the civil liability provisions of U.S. federal securities laws against us and our officers and directors who are not resident in the United States. In addition, Brazil does not have a treaty with the United States to facilitate or expedite the enforcement in Brazil of decisions issued by a state court in the United States, which shall necessarily be previously recognized by the Brazilian Superior Court of Justice in order to be effective in Brazil. Further, it is unclear if original actions predicated on civil liabilities based solely upon U.S. federal securities laws are enforceable in courts outside the United States, including in the Cayman Islands and Brazil. Courts of the Cayman Islands may not, in an original action in the Cayman Islands, recognize or enforce judgments of U.S. courts predicated upon the civil liability provisions of the securities laws of the United States or any state of the United States on the grounds that such provisions are penal in nature. Although there is no statutory enforcement in the Cayman Islands of judgments obtained in the United States, courts of the Cayman Islands will recognize and enforce a foreign judgment of a court of competent jurisdiction if such judgment is final, for a liquidated sum, provided it is not in respect of taxes or a fine or penalty, is not inconsistent with a Cayman Islands' judgment in respect of the same matters, and is not impeachable under Cayman Islands law for fraud, being in breach of public policy of the Cayman Islands or being contrary to natural justice. In addition, a Cayman Islands court may stay proceedings if concurrent proceedings are being brought elsewhere.

Most of our assets are located in Brazil. If proceedings are brought in the courts of Brazil seeking to enforce our obligations to pay any amounts in respect of our Class A common shares (including in the form of BDRs), we may not be required to discharge our obligations in a currency other than the real. Under Brazilian exchange control laws, an obligation in Brazil to pay amounts denominated in a currency other than the real may only be satisfied in Brazilian currency at the exchange rate, as determined by the Central Bank, in effect on the date the enforcement of the judgment in Brazil is obtained, and such amounts are then adjusted to reflect exchange rate variations through the effective payment date. The then-prevailing exchange rate may not fully compensate non-Brazilian investors for any claim arising out of or related to our obligations under the Class A common shares.

Sales of substantial amounts of our Class A common shares in the public market (including in the form of BDRs), or the perception that these sales may occur, could cause the market price of our Class A common shares or BDRs to decline. This could also impair our ability to raise additional capital through the sale of our equity securities. Under our Articles of Association, we are authorized to issue up to 630,000,000 shares, of which 312,639,827 common shares are outstanding as of December 31, 2022, (comprised of 293,891,057 Class A common shares and 18,748,770 Class B common shares). We cannot predict the size of future issuances of our shares or the effect, if any, that future sales and issuances of shares would have on the market price of our Class A common shares or BDRs. In addition, we have adopted the LTIP, under which we have the discretion to grant a broad range of equity-based awards to eligible participants. In May 2022, we also approved a new incentive plan pool, comprised of 19.2 million shares to be granted in the form of RSUs and PSUs under the LTIP. See "Item 6. Directors, Senior Management and Employees-B. Compensation-Long-Term Incentive Plans (LTIP)." We have registered on a Form S-8 registration statement all common shares that we may issue under the LTIP. As a result, these can be freely sold in the public market upon issuance, subject to volume limitations applicable to affiliates and the lock-up agreements described in "Item 10. Additional Information-B. Memorandum and articles of association," and any other applicable restrictions. Sales of these shares in the public market, or the perception that those sales may occur, could cause the prevailing market price to decrease or to be lower than it might be in the absence of those sales or perceptions. Also, if a large number of our Class A common shares or securities convertible into our Class A common shares are sold in the public market after they become eligible for sale, the sales could reduce the trading price of our Class A common shares or BDRs and impede our ability to raise future capital.