Aptera Motors Corp. Class B (SEV) Risk Analysis

We are registering for resale shares of our Class B common stock, which are non-voting and do not carry any voting rights on matters submitted to stockholders, except as required by Delaware law. Only holders of our Class A common stock have voting rights. As a result, investors purchasing Class B common stock in this offering will have no ability to influence most corporate decisions and will have significantly less influence over our affairs compared to holders of our Class A common stock.

Our Class B common stock is non-voting. As of December 31, 2025, our directors, executive officers, and holders of more than 5% of our common stock, and their respective affiliates, held 97% of the voting power of our capital stock. Because of dual class structure, the holders of our Class A common stock collectively control a substantial majority of the combined voting power of our common stock and therefore are able to control all matters submitted to our stockholders for approval until such time as there are no longer any outstanding shares of Class A common stock and/or holders of our voting stock amend our certificate of incorporation to allow for a vote. This concentrated control limits or precludes your ability to influence corporate matters for the foreseeable future, including the election of directors, amendments of our organizational documents, and any merger, consolidation, sale of all or substantially all of our assets, or other major corporate transaction requiring stockholder approval. In addition, this may prevent or discourage unsolicited acquisition proposals or offers for our capital stock that you may feel are in your best interest as one of our stockholders. Future transfers by holders of Class A common stock will generally result in those shares converting to Class B common stock, subject to limited exceptions, such as certain permitted transfers, including certain transfers to family members, trusts solely for the benefit of the stockholder or their family members, affiliates under common control with the stockholder, and partnerships, corporations, and other entities exclusively owned by the stockholder or their family members, or permitted by our Board, in each case as fully described in our Amended & Restated Certificate of Incorporation (our "Amended Charter"). The conversion of Class A common stock to Class B common stock will have the effect, over time, of increasing the relative voting power of those holders of Class A common stock who retain their shares in the long term.

Our Amended Charter, to the fullest extent permitted by law, provides that the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware, or to the extent the Court of Chancery does not have jurisdiction, the federal district court of the District of Delaware, will be the exclusive forum for any derivative action or proceeding brought on our behalf; any action asserting a breach of fiduciary duty; any action asserting a claim against us arising pursuant to the DGCL, our Amended Charter; or any action asserting a claim against us that is governed by the internal affairs doctrine. Moreover, Section 22 of the Securities Act creates concurrent jurisdiction for federal and state courts over all claims brought to enforce any duty or liability created by the Securities Act or the rules and regulations thereunder and our Amended Charter will provide that the U.S. federal district courts will, to the fullest extent permitted by law, be the exclusive forum for resolving any complaint asserting a cause of action arising under the Securities Act, or a federal forum provision". Our decision to adopt a federal forum provision followed a decision by the Supreme Court of the State of Delaware holding that such provisions are facially valid under Delaware law. While there can be no assurance that federal or state courts will follow the holding of the Delaware Supreme Court or determine that the federal forum provision should be enforced in a particular case, application of the federal forum provision means that suits brought by our stockholders to enforce any duty or liability created by the Securities Act must be brought in federal court and cannot be brought in state court. Section 27 of the Exchange Act creates exclusive federal jurisdiction over all claims brought to enforce any duty or liability created by the Exchange Act or the rules and regulations thereunder and neither the exclusive forum provision nor the federal forum provision applies to suits brought to enforce any duty or liability created by the Exchange Act. Accordingly, actions by our stockholders to enforce any duty or liability created by the Exchange Act or the rules and regulations thereunder must be brought in federal court. Our stockholders will not be deemed to have waived our compliance with the federal securities laws and the regulations promulgated thereunder. Any person or entity purchasing or otherwise acquiring or holding any interest in any of our securities will be deemed to have notice of and consented to our exclusive forum provisions, including the federal forum provision. These provisions may limit our stockholders' ability to bring a claim in a judicial forum they find favorable for disputes with us or our directors, officers, or other employees, which may discourage lawsuits against us and our directors, officers, and other employees. Alternatively, if a court were to find the choice of forum provision contained in our Amended Charter to be inapplicable or unenforceable in an action, we may incur additional costs associated with resolving such action in other jurisdictions, which could harm our business, operating results, and financial condition.

Provisions in our Amended Charter and our Bylaws may have the effect of delaying or preventing a merger, acquisition, or other change of control of our Company that the stockholders may consider favorable. In addition, because our board of directors is responsible for appointing the members of our management team, these provisions may frustrate or prevent any attempts by our stockholders to replace or remove our current management by making it more difficult for stockholders to replace members of our board of directors. Among other things, our Amended Charter and Bylaws include provisions that: - our Amended Charter provides for a dual class capital structure. As a result of this structure, our Co-CEOs, Chris Anthony and Steve Fambro have the ability to control all stockholder decisions. This includes the election of directors and significant corporate transactions, such as a merger or other sale of our Company or our assets. This concentrated control could discourage others from initiating any potential merger, takeover, or other change-of-control transaction that other stockholders may view as beneficial;     - our board of directors has the right to elect directors to fill a vacancy created by the expansion of our board of directors or the resignation, death, or removal of a director, which prevents stockholders from being able to fill vacancies on our board of directors;     - our Amended Charter prohibits cumulative voting in the election of directors. This limits the ability of minority stockholders to elect directors; and     - our board of directors may issue, without stockholder approval, shares of undesignated preferred stock. The ability to issue undesignated preferred stock makes it possible for our board of directors to issue preferred stock with voting or other rights or preferences that could impede the success of any attempt to acquire us. Any provision of our Amended Charter, Bylaws, or Delaware law that has the effect of delaying or deterring a change in control could limit the opportunity for our stockholders to receive a premium for their shares of our common stock, and could also affect the price that some investors are willing to pay for our Class B common stock.

Few companies have conducted direct listings, and the direct listing process we undertook is relatively novel. The absence of a traditional underwritten offering may contribute to a less orderly market for our Class B common stock, resulting in increased volatility in the trading price and potential difficulties in achieving a stable market price. Unlike a traditional initial public offering, there was no firm-commitment underwritten offering to help inform efficient and sufficient price discovery. Consequently, the public price of our Class B common stock may be more volatile than it would be if shares were initially listed in connection with a firm-commitment underwritten initial public offering. In addition, the trading volume and price of shares of our Class B common stock may be more volatile and subject to greater fluctuations due to the direct listing method.

Electric vehicle companies have historically experienced high levels of stock price volatility. The price of our Class B common stock also could be subject to wide fluctuations in response to the risk factors described in this annual report and others beyond our control, including: - the number of shares of our Class B common stock and Class A common stock publicly owned and available for trading;     - actual or anticipated fluctuations in our financial condition, operating results and other operating and non-GAAP metrics;     - our actual or anticipated operating performance and the operating performance of our competitors;     - changes in the projected operational and financial results we provide to the public or our failure to meet those projections;     - any major change in our board of directors, management, or key personnel;     - the economy as a whole and market conditions in our industry;     - rumors and market speculation involving us or other companies in our industry;     - announcements by us or our competitors of significant innovations, new products, services, features, integrations or capabilities, acquisitions, strategic investments, partnerships, joint ventures, or capital commitments;     - lawsuits threatened or filed against us;     - other events or factors, including pandemics, war, incidents of terrorism, or responses to these events; and     - sales or expected sales of our Class B common stock by us, and our officers, directors, and principal stockholders. Moreover, to the extent the trading value of our Class B common stock diverge, holders of our Class B common stock may engage in hedging and other activities which could result in additional volatility in the price of our Class B common stock and could result in significant declines in the price of our Class B common stock. There will likely be more ability for such investors to short our Class B common stock in early trading than is typical for a traditional underwritten public offering given increased availability of our Class B common stock on the trading markets in part due to the lack of contractual lock-up agreements or other restrictions on transfer. To the extent that there is a lack of awareness among retail investors, such lack of awareness could reduce the value of our Class B common stock and cause volatility in the public trading price of our Class B common stock. Furthermore, the stock market has recently experienced extreme price and volume fluctuations that have affected and continue to affect the market prices of equity securities of many companies and financial services and technology companies in particular. These fluctuations often have been unrelated or disproportionate to the operating performance of those companies. These broad market and industry fluctuations, as well as general economic, political, and market conditions such as recessions, interest rate changes, or international currency fluctuations, may negatively impact the market price of our Class B common stock. In the past, companies that have experienced volatility in the market price of their stock have been subject to securities class action litigation. We may be the target of this type of litigation in the future. Securities litigation against us could result in substantial costs and divert our management's attention from other business concerns, which could harm our business.

In addition to the supply and demand and volatility factors discussed above, sales of a substantial number of shares of our Class B common stock into the public market, particularly sales by our Co-CEOs, directors, executive officers, and principal stockholders, or the perception that these sales might occur in large quantities, could cause the trading price of our Class B common stock to decline. None of our securityholders are subject to any contractual lock-up or other contractual restriction on the transfer or sale of their shares.

Certain stock index providers, such as S&P Dow Jones, exclude companies with multiple classes of shares of common stock from being added to certain stock indices, including the S&P 500. In addition, several stockholder advisory firms and large institutional investors oppose the use of multiple class structures. As a result, the dual class structure of our common stock may prevent the inclusion of our Class B common stock in such indices, may cause stockholder advisory firms to publish negative commentary about our corporate governance practices or otherwise seek to cause us to change our capital structure, and may result in large institutional investors not purchasing shares of our Class B common stock. Any exclusion from stock indices could result in a less active trading market for our Class B common stock. Any actions or publications by stockholder advisory firms or institutional investors critical of our corporate governance practices or capital structure could also adversely affect the value of our Class B common stock.

The trading market for our Class B common stock depends in part on the research and reports that securities or industry analysts publish about us or our business, our market, and our competitors. We do not have control over these securities analysts. If industry analysts do not cover us or cease coverage of us, the trading price for our Class B common stock would be negatively affected. If one or more of the analysts who cover us downgrade our Class B common stock or publish inaccurate or unfavorable research about our business, our Class B common stock price would likely decline. If one or more of these analysts cease coverage of us or cannot publish reports on us regularly, demand for our Class B common stock could decrease, which might cause our Class B common stock price and trading volume to decline.

We are an "emerging growth company" as defined in the JOBS Act. We will remain an emerging growth company until the earliest of (1) the last day of the fiscal year in which we have total annual gross revenue of $1.235 billion or more; (2) the last day of the fiscal year following the fifth anniversary of the date of our first public equity sale; (3) the date on which we have issued more than $1.0 billion in nonconvertible debt during the previous three years; and (4) the date on which we are deemed to be a "large accelerated filer" under the rules of the SEC. For so long as we remain an emerging growth company, we are permitted to, and intend to, rely on exemptions from certain disclosure requirements that are applicable to other public companies that are not "emerging growth companies," including: - not being required to comply with the auditor attestation requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act;     - reduced disclosure obligations regarding executive compensation; and     - exemptions from the requirements of holding a nonbinding advisory vote on executive compensation and stockholder approval of any golden parachute payments not previously approved. We currently intend to take advantage of the available exemptions described above. We have taken advantage of reduced reporting burdens in this annual report. We cannot predict if investors will find our Class B common stock less attractive if we rely on these exemptions. If some investors find our Class B common stock less attractive as a result of these decisions, there may be a less active trading market for our Class B common stock and the price of our Class B common stock may be more volatile.

As a public benefit corporation, our board of directors has a duty to balance (i) the pecuniary interest of our stockholders, (ii) the best interests of those materially affected by our conduct, and (iii) specific public benefits identified in our charter documents. While we believe our public benefit designation and obligation will benefit our stockholders, in balancing these interests, our board of directors may take actions that do not maximize stockholder value. Any benefits to stockholders resulting from our public benefit purposes may not materialize within the timeframe we expect or at all and may have negative effects. For example: - we may choose to revise or implement policies in ways that we believe will be beneficial to our stakeholders, including suppliers, employees, and local communities, even though the changes may be costly;- we may be influenced to pursue programs and services to demonstrate our commitment to the communities to which we serve even though there is no immediate return to our stockholders; and     - in responding to a possible proposal to acquire the Company, our board of directors may be influenced by the interests of our stakeholders, including suppliers, employees, and local communities, whose interests may be different from the interests of our stockholders.

While directors of traditional corporations are required to make decisions they believe to be in the best interests of their stockholders, directors of a public benefit corporation have a fiduciary duty to consider not only the stockholders' pecuniary interests, but also the Company's specific public benefit and the best interests of stakeholders materially affected by the Company's actions. Under Delaware law, directors are shielded from liability for breach of these obligations if they make informed and disinterested decisions that are not such that no person of ordinary, sound judgment would approve. Thus, unlike traditional corporations which must focus exclusively on stockholder value, our directors are not merely permitted, but obligated, to consider our specific public benefit and the interests of other stakeholders. In the event of a conflict between the interests of our stockholders and the interests of our specific public benefit or our other stakeholders, our directors must only make informed and disinterested decisions that are not such that no person of ordinary, sound judgment would approve; thus, there is no guarantee such a conflict would be resolved in favor of our stockholders, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations, which in turn could cause our stock price to decline.