Want to see PHI full AI Analyst Report?
PLDT (PHI) Risk Analysis
Risk Overview Q4, 2025
Source: the company's latest filing for the period ended Dec 31, 2025, filed Apr 27, 2026
Risk Change Over Time
- Regulation - Risk 1Our business is subject to extensive laws and regulations, including regulations in respect of our public ownership, service rates and taxes, as well as antitrust laws. Any changes in such laws and regulations or interpretations thereto, or failure to comply with regulatory changes, could adversely affect our business, financial performance and prospects.
Our business is subject to extensive laws and regulations, including regulations in respect of our public ownership, service rates and taxes, in addition to antitrust laws. Republic Act No. 7925, otherwise known as the "Public Telecommunications Policy of the Philippines" (R.A. 7925), requires a telecommunications entity with regulated types of services to make a bona fide public offering through the stock exchange of its shares representing at least 30% of its aggregate common shares within five years from: (a) the date the law became effective; or (b) the entity's commencement of commercial operations, whichever date is later. Republic Act No. 10926 provides an exemption from the public listing requirement if the grantee is wholly-owned by a company that has publicly listed at least 30% of its authorized capital stock. PLDT is a publicly listed company and therefore in compliance with this requirement. Smart, as a wholly-owned subsidiary of PLDT, a publicly listed company, is not required to offer any of its shares to the public. Meanwhile, DMPI takes the position that it has satisfied the public offering requirement under R.A. 7925 and Republic Act No. 9180 (R.A. 9180), or the legislative franchise of DMPI (DMPI's Franchise), by virtue of the fact that PLDT, a publicly listed company, holds a 99.6% equity interest in DMPI's parent company, Digitel Telecommunications Philippines, Inc. (DTPI), which in turn, holds a 100% equity interest in DMPI. The NTC regulates the rates we are permitted to charge for services that have not been deregulated, such as local exchange services. We are subject to various national and local taxes, and regulatory fees imposed by LGUs through their respective ordinances. We cannot assure you that we will not be subject to new, increased and/or additional taxes or that we will be able to pass on such additional expenses to our customers. See Note 26 – Provisions and Contingencies to the accompanying audited consolidated financial statements in Item 18. "Financial Statements" for further discussion. Moreover, we are subject to antitrust laws and regulations. Republic Act No. 10667, otherwise known as the Philippine Competition Act (Philippine Competition Act), came into effect on August 8, 2015, and prohibits practices that restrict market competition through anti-competitive agreements or the abuse of dominant position. The Philippine Competition Act also requires parties to provide notification and obtain clearance for certain mergers and acquisitions. Violators may be subject to administrative and criminal penalties. While our business practices have not in the past been found to have violated any antitrust laws and regulations, we cannot assure you that any new or existing governmental regulators will not, in the future, take the position that our current or past business practices have an anti-competitive effect on the Philippine telecommunications industry. Smart is currently subject to an ongoing inquiry by the Philippine Competition Commission (PCC) involving multiple subpoenas, hearings, and continuing requests for information in relation to its operations as a public telecommunications entity (PTE), interconnection arrangements with other carriers, and International Simple Resale (ISR)-related matters involving DITO. As of this writing, no final ruling has been issued. See Note 26 – Provisions and Contingencies to the accompanying audited consolidated financial statements in Item 18. "Financial Statements" for further discussion. In 2025, House Bill 178, otherwise known as the Automatic Refund for Internet and Telecommunications Services Outages and Disruptions Act, was transmitted by Congress to the Senate, where it remained pending. The bill would require PTEs, including ISPs, to automatically refund or adjust a customer's bill when they experience a cumulative internet service outage or interruption lasting twenty-four (24) hours or more within a month. However, the bill provides exemptions in the case of scheduled maintenance (with a 48-hour advance notice and not exceeding 48 hours per month), fortuitous events, or acts of third parties or subscribers. The implementation of House Bill 178 would require PLDT Group to implement granular, per-customer service-quality monitoring and undertake substantial adjustments to operations, processes, and network infrastructure, which could entail significant capital expenditure and operating expenditure, and may present challenges in meeting regulatory transition timelines. The KP Act lapsed into law on August 24, 2025. The IRR, published on December 1, 2025, establishes a comprehensive and liberalized regulatory framework that removes the requirement for a legislative franchise and Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity (CPCN) for data transmission industry participants, and opens all segments of the data transmission network to competition. Under the IRR, entities classified as Data Transmission Industry Participants must comply with new eligibility, registration, reporting, and performance standards, including mandatory annual submissions, adherence to minimum quality-of-service benchmarks, separate accounting per network segment, and compliance with cybersecurity certification requirements. The IRR also requires access providers, including incumbent operators such as us, to publish Reference Access Offers on open, fair, reasonable, and non-discriminatory terms, while granting regulators the authority to impose ex-ante obligations on entities designated as having significant market power. Further, the forthcoming SMPF contemplates periodic spectrum audits and potential recall of unutilized or underutilized spectrum, which may affect network planning and asset utilization. These changes substantially increase compliance obligations and lower barriers for new entrants, thereby intensifying competitive pressures. The KP Act and its IRR may introduce operational, financial, and strategic challenges for incumbent players that may materially affect our business, results of operations, or financial condition. House Bill 87, approved by the House of Representatives in December 2025 and pending Senate action, proposes to mandate a roll-over data allocation scheme requiring ISPs to carry over unused data to the next billing cycle and impose penalties for non-compliance. The roll-over regime outlined under the bill, if enacted, would require extensive changes to data-management frameworks, billing systems, and related operational processes to ensure accurate tracking, accumulation, and application of unused data entitlements. These requirements may result in significant capital expenditure and operating expenditure for the PLDT Group, and any failure to meet the prescribed standards or timelines may subject us to penalties or sanctions. On September 29, 2025, the NTC issued Memorandum Order No. ###-##-####. The memorandum requires internet intermediaries under the supervision of the NTC, including us, to submit quarterly compliance reports on the implementation of R.A. No. 11930 or the Anti-Online Sexual Abuse or Exploitation of Children and Anti-Child Sexual Abuse or Exploitation Materials Act, including blocking and preservation of data traffic and any measures adopted to strengthen safeguards. As part of its advocacy on online safety, PLDT has invested in a child protection platform to detect and access malicious sites and URLs, and continually monitors and submits reports as required. It also undertakes regular awareness campaigns on internet safety. However, there is no assurance that our users are fully protected against the dangers of the internet. On January 26, 2026, the SEC issued SEC Memorandum Circular No. 7, Series of 2026 (effective February 1, 2026 after publication in two newspapers of general and national circulation), which covers PSE-listed companies and limits an individual's ability to serve as an independent director in the same company to a maximum cumulative term of nine years, with the maximum term for incumbent independent directors generally reckoned from calendar year 2012. An independent director who has served the maximum cumulative term is perpetually barred from re-election as an independent director of the same company, subject to a transitory provision allowing incumbents who have already reached the maximum term upon effectivity to continue until the 2026 annual stockholders' meeting (or another date approved by the SEC). Covered companies that breach the maximum cumulative term limit are subject to a basic penalty of Php1,000,000.00 per independent director per year and a continuing penalty of Php30,000.00 for every month that the independent director holds the seat, and a third or succeeding offense for the same violation may result in the suspension or revocation of the company's secondary or primary license. While the Company is taking steps to comply with the SEC Memorandum Circular and update relevant corporate policies to align with the amended guidelines, nonetheless, if not timely implemented, the Company may be exposed to penalties. Regulators have been increasingly focused on online and mobile payment services, and other developments could reduce the convenience or utility of our payment services for users. Governmental regulation of certain aspects of mobile payment systems which PLDT utilizes could result in obligations or restrictions with respect to the types of products that we may offer to consumers, the payment card systems that link to our mobile payments systems, the jurisdictions in which our payment services or apps may be used, and higher costs, such as fees charged by banks to process funds through our mobile payments systems. We may be subject to more obligations and restrictions as more jurisdictions regulate payment systems. Moreover, if new regulations provide resources, preferential treatment or protection to selected payments and processing providers, we could be displaced, prevented or substantially restricted from participating in the relevant geographies. Any adverse changes in applicable laws and regulations can have an adverse impact on our business, results of operations, financial condition and prospects. For additional details of the impact of regulations on our business, see "Franchises, Licenses and Regulations."
- Regulation - Risk 2The franchises, licenses and regulatory approvals, upon which PLDT relies, may be subject to revocation or delay in issuance, which could result in the suspension of our services or abandonment of any planned expansions and could thereby have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition and prospects.
We operate our business in a highly regulated environment. We cannot assure you that there will be no adverse changes in applicable public ownership requirements or interpretations thereof, or that none of our franchises, permits or licenses will be revoked or fail to be renewed. Any such occurrences could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial conditions and prospects. PLDT has obtained Certificates of Public Convenience and Necessity (CPCN) for its international gateway facilities, local exchange carriers, and interexchange carrier services. While CPCNs are typically co-terminus with the term of a public utility's franchise, the NTC may amend certain terms of a CPCN, or revoke a CPCN for cause, subject to due process procedures. Following the enactment of the KP Act and the issuance of its Implementing Rules and Regulations (IRR), the requirement for a legislative franchise and CPCN for data transmission services was removed and replaced with a registration-based regulatory regime administered by the relevant government agencies. We cannot guarantee that the NTC will not impose additional obligations on us that, if unmet, could lead to the revocation of our licenses and/or a reduction in our total revenues or profitability. The NTC could amend applicable regulations or implement additional guidelines governing our interconnection with other telecommunications companies or the rates and terms upon which we provide services to our customers. In addition, any future expansions in our services, particularly in our mobile services, could subject us to additional conditions in the granting of our provisional authorities by the NTC and to increased regulatory scrutiny, which could have a material adverse effect on our growth and prospects. The occurrence of any of the foregoing could impose substantial costs on us, cause interruptions or considerable delays in the provision, development or expansion of our services, or materially reduce our revenues and profitability. There is no assurance that the regulatory environment will support increases in our business and financial activity. We continue to hold various provisional authorities, CPCNs, spectrum assignments, and other regulatory approvals, some of which are transitional in nature and will expire between now and 2042. Certain CPCNs and provisional authorities have already expired; however, applications for renewal were filed prior to their expiry. Under Executive Order No. 292 (Philippine Revised Administrative Code of 1987) and Republic Act No. 11032 (Ease of Doing Business and Efficient Government Service Delivery Act of 2018), such authorizations are deemed effective until the regulator acts on the renewal applications. Failure to maintain the necessary regulatory authority, approvals, or compliance status may materially and adversely affect our ability to conduct essential business operations, result in penalties, suspension of authority, or increased compliance costs, and adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations. See Item 4. "Information on the Company – Franchises, Licenses and Regulations" for more information.
- Environmental / Social - Risk 3Climate change could increase the likelihood of natural disasters and environmental legislation and regulations, which may damage our infrastructure and hinder our operations, and also spur the Philippine Government to introduce new regulations that result in higher compliance costs.
Climate change poses infrastructural and regulatory risks for telecommunications operators like us. Climate change may exacerbate the severity and frequency of natural disasters, such as typhoons, flooding and earthquakes. The occurrence of such natural disasters increases the likelihood of damage to our infrastructure and failure of our wired and wireless networks. Should severe natural disasters occur in quick succession, we may not have sufficient resources to repair and restore our infrastructure in a timely and cost-effective manner. Natural disasters could also affect and disrupt our supply chain, resulting in delays in the delivery of our supplies, and further hampering efforts to repair and restore our infrastructure. The cost of restoring and/or repair damaged infrastructure and any failure of our networks could have a material adverse impact on our operations, financial performance, reputation and prospects. Climate change and resulting natural disasters may also affect certain communities' livelihoods and adversely impact our customers' ability to afford our services. The Philippine Government could introduce new and more stringent environmental legislation and regulations. The KP Act and its IRR impose specific obligations on data transmission providers during natural disasters and emergencies. During such times, we are required to design and maintain infrastructure in accordance with nationally and internationally accepted resiliency standards, ensure the prompt restoration of services, and provide temporary shared-access data services where feasible. The IRR also mandates strict outage reporting, including immediate notification to regulators for service interruptions caused by natural events such as typhoons, floods, earthquakes, or cable cuts. Failure to comply with these requirements may subject us to administrative penalties or sanctions, including the suspension or revocation of authorizations. These heightened obligations may increase our operating and capital expenditures as we work to meet strengthened compliance requirements. We are also now subject to expanded sustainability reporting obligations under the Philippine Financial Reporting Standards on Sustainability Disclosures, particularly PFRS S1 and PFRS S2. These standards require entities to disclose material sustainability-related and climate-related risks and opportunities in a manner aligned with global International Sustainability Standards Board (ISSB) expectations. PFRS S2, in particular, introduces extensive climate-related disclosure requirements covering greenhouse gas emissions, transition risks, physical climate risks, scenario analysis, and the anticipated financial impacts of climate-related events. In addition, Extended Producers Responsibility (EPR) Act (R.A. 11898) requires companies with assets exceeding Php100 million and generating plastic packaging waste to manage the full environmental lifecycle of their products and to recover or remove an equivalent volume of the plastic they introduce into the market. PLDT and Smart have strengthened their commitment to the EPR Act. The Group has engaged PCX Markets Philippines, Inc. as its Producer Responsibility Organization for the implementation of its EPR programs and reporting.
- Environmental / Social - Risk 4Changes in regulations or user concerns regarding the privacy and protection of user data, or any failure to comply with data privacy laws, could adversely affect our business.
We are subject to various laws and regulations regulating data privacy matters, including Republic Act No. 10173, otherwise known as the Data Privacy Act of 2012 (Data Privacy Act). The Data Privacy Act regulates the processing of personal data in the public and private sectors, within and outside the Philippines. Pursuant to Republic Act No. 11934, otherwise known as the SIM Registration Act, we are required to maintain a SIM register of all our end users, exposing us to heightened risks of data breaches and cybersecurity attacks. Bills impacting privacy and the processing of personal data have been filed with the Philippine Congress. While these bills do not directly seek to amend the Data Privacy Act, if signed into law, these legislation could increase our compliance costs and impact business innovation. In addition, various foreign legislative or regulatory bodies continue to enact new or additional laws and regulations concerning privacy, data retention and data protection issues, including laws or regulations mandating disclosure to domestic or international law enforcement bodies, which could adversely impact our results of operations, businesses, brand or reputation with users. Transfers of personal data across jurisdictions subject us to regulation by foreign authorities, which may require us to incur additional costs in complying with such regulations. The interpretation and application of privacy, data protection and data retention laws and regulations in each jurisdiction may be subject to change and such laws and regulations may be interpreted and applied inconsistently from country to country, complicating long-term business planning decisions. Complying with varying international requirements could cause us to incur substantial costs or require us to change our business practices or operating platforms in a manner adverse to our business. While the PLDT Group periodically conducts compliance audits and regularly holds privacy and information security training and awareness campaigns, it cannot guarantee that personal data breaches resulting from failure of our personnel to comply with PLDT policies will not occur. Furthermore, while PLDT periodically releases public advisories to remind our customers of safe online behavior, there is no guarantee that our customers will not be victims of data breaches. If our current policies and practices are found to be incompatible with privacy, data protection or data retention laws, we may be fined or ordered to change our business practices in a manner that adversely impacts our operating results. Any failure, or perceived failure, by us to comply with any privacy, data-retention or data-protection-related laws, regulations, orders or industry self-regulatory principles, including the Data Privacy Act, could result in proceedings or actions against us by governmental entities or affected parties, loss of user confidence, damage to the PLDT brands and reputation, or the loss of users or advertising partners. Any of the foregoing could have a material adverse impact on our business operations, financial conditions and prospects.
Risk Highlights Q4, 2025
Risk Word Cloud
Risk Factors Full Breakdown - Total Risks 30
- Economy & Political Environment - Risk 1AddedEscalation of geopolitical tensions in the Middle East, including the Iran regional conflict, could disrupt global energy markets, supply chains, and financial conditions, which may indirectly adversely affect our business, financial condition, and results of operations.
Ongoing geopolitical tensions in the Middle East, including the Iran regional conflict, present risks to global economic stability. Any escalation of hostilities could disrupt international energy markets, shipping routes, and supply chains, leading to volatility in fuel prices, inflationary pressures, and tighter global financial conditions. Such developments may adversely affect foreign exchange rates, interest rates, and capital markets, and could reduce consumer and business spending in the Philippines. Although our operations are primarily domestic, we rely on global supply chains for network equipment, technology, fuel, and other critical inputs. Disruptions arising from geopolitical instability, including sanctions, trade restrictions, or logistical constraints, could increase our operating and capital expenditures, delay network deployments or maintenance activities, and impact service delivery. In addition, heightened global risk aversion may increase borrowing costs or limit access to financing. Any of these developments could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows. There can be no assurance that the Iran regional conflict or related geopolitical tensions will not intensify further.
- Economy & Political Environment - Risk 2Developments outside of the Philippines, including U.S. policies related to global trade and tariffs could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
The current international political environment, including existing and potential changes to U.S. policies related to global trade and tariffs, have resulted in some uncertainty surrounding the future state of the global economy. Since 2018, the U.S. began to increase or impose tariffs on many products, particularly from China, among other jurisdictions, including, but not limited to, solar panels, steel and aluminum products, consumer electronics, and industrial chemicals. In 2025, President Donald Trump imposed tariffs of at least 10% on goods from a number of countries. In response, the European Union, China and other affected jurisdictions have introduced tariffs on U.S. goods. An escalating trade war may have material adverse effects on the power industry and our business may be impacted by these tariffs. Any further expansion in the types or levels of tariffs implemented has the potential to negatively impact our business, financial condition and results of operations. Additionally, there is a risk that the U.S. tariffs on imports are met with tariffs on U.S. produced exports and that a broader trade conflict could ensue, which has the potential to significantly impact global trade and economic conditions. Potential costs and any attendant impact on pricing arising from these tariffs and any further expansion in the types or levels of tariffs implemented could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. While there are ongoing discussions between the U.S. and China regarding tariffs, there is no certainty as to the timing and scale of reduction in tariffs, if any, and the overall impact on global markets. Thus, economic disruption in other countries, even in countries in which we do not currently conduct business or have operations, could also adversely affect our businesses and results.
- Economy & Political Environment - Risk 3Political and social instability in the Philippines may have a negative effect on the general economic conditions in the Philippines which could have a material adverse impact on our results of operations and financial condition.
The Philippines has, from time to time, experienced episodes of political uncertainty and unrest, including recent public and political protests arising from alleged misconduct involving the current and prior administrations, as well as ongoing legislative and institutional controversies. Over the past two decades, the Philippines has also faced hearings and investigations into graft and corruption involving senior government officials, impeachment proceedings against two former presidents and a chief justice of the Supreme Court, the nullification of the appointment of another chief justice, allegations of electoral fraud, and instances of extra-judicial killings. There can be no assurance that acts of election-related or other political violence will not occur in the future, and any such events could negatively impact the Philippine economy. We may be affected by political and social developments in the Philippines and changes in the political leadership and/or government policies in the Philippines. Any major deviation from the policies of the previous administration or fundamental change of direction, including a change in the form of government, may lead to an increase in political or social uncertainty and instability. Such political or regulatory changes may include (but are not limited to) the introduction of new laws and regulations that could impact our business. We cannot assure you that the political environment in the Philippines will be stable or that the current or future administration will adopt economic policies that are conducive to sustained economic growth or which do not materially and adversely impact the current regulatory environment for the telecommunications and other companies. An unstable political or social environment in the Philippines could negatively affect the general economic conditions and business environment in the Philippines which, in turn, could have a material and adverse impact on our business, financial position and financial performance.
- Economy & Political Environment - Risk 4Territorial disputes with China and a number of Southeast Asian countries may disrupt the Philippine economy and business environment.
The Philippines, China and several Southeast Asian nations have been engaged in a series of longstanding territorial disputes over certain areas in the West Philippine Sea, also known as the South China Sea. The Philippines maintains that its claim over the disputed territories is supported by recognized principles of international law consistent with the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS). Over the years, tensions have periodically risen in disputed features such as the Scarborough Shoal and other areas within the Philippine exclusive economic zone, with maritime incidents, diplomatic protests, and overlapping patrols contributing to regional uncertainty. These developments have the potential to affect trade flows, investment sentiment, and bilateral relations. In addition, heightened tensions in the Taiwan Strait have emerged as a broader regional geopolitical risk. Given the Philippines' geographic proximity to Taiwan and its strategic role in regional security dynamics, any escalation of cross-strait tensions – whether involving military activity, blockades, or disruptions to shipping lanes – could affect regional stability, trade routes, labor mobility, supply chains, and investor confidence. Such developments could indirectly impact the Philippine economy and may also disrupt the business environment in ways that affect our operations. Should territorial disputes between the Philippines and other countries in the region continue or escalate further, the Philippines may experience disruptions across key sectors. These include potential impacts on the supply and prices of energy, food and other critical commodities; delays in the delivery of equipment and materials sourced from the affected routes; and volatility in capital markets, foreign-exchange conditions, and investment activity. Heightened geopolitical tensions could also give rise to more restrictive regulatory or governmental actions or reciprocal trade measures, particularly in the context of disputes involving China. Any such escalation may materially and adversely affect the Philippine economy and, in turn, our business, financial condition, and results of operations. There can be no assurance that these regional disputes or tensions will not intensify in the future.
See a full breakdown of risk according to category and subcategory. The list starts with the category with the most risk. Click on subcategories to read relevant extracts from the most recent report.