tiprankstipranks
Advertisement

UPGD - ETF AI Analysis

Compare

Top Page

UPGD

Invesco Raymond James Sb-1 Equity Etf (UPGD)

Rating:70Neutral
Price Target:
UPGD’s rating suggests it is a solid, but not perfect, equity ETF, supported by several strong, diversified holdings. Standout positions like Expedia, Incyte, and Expeditors International contribute positively through robust financial performance, growth initiatives, and generally favorable technical trends, while companies such as International Paper introduce some drag due to weaker earnings, cash flow challenges, and bearish momentum. The main risk factor is that a few holdings face valuation and leverage concerns, which could increase volatility even though the overall mix remains reasonably balanced.
Positive Factors
Solid Recent Performance
The ETF has shown strong gains so far this year and over the last few months, indicating positive momentum.
Broad Sector Diversification
Holdings are spread across several sectors, including industrials, consumer cyclical, consumer defensive, technology, utilities, health care, materials, and communication services, which helps reduce reliance on any single industry.
Strong Leading Holding
NetApp, one of the largest positions, has delivered very strong performance, providing a meaningful boost to the fund.
Negative Factors
High U.S. Concentration
Almost all assets are invested in U.S. companies, which limits geographic diversification and ties the fund closely to the U.S. economy.
Several Weak Top Holdings
Multiple major positions, including Rivian Automotive, Expedia, Mettler-Toledo, Dollar General, International Paper, and Verisk Analytics, have shown weak performance, which can drag on overall returns.
Moderate Expense Ratio
The fund’s expense ratio is not especially low, meaning fees take a noticeable bite out of investor returns compared with cheaper ETFs.

UPGD vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)

UPGD Summary

The Invesco Raymond James SB-1 Equity ETF (UPGD) tracks the Bloomberg ANR Improvers Index, aiming to invest in U.S. companies that analysts at Raymond James rate as strong buys. It holds a mix of large, mid, and small companies across many sectors, with a tilt toward industrial and consumer-focused businesses. Well-known names in the fund include Dollar General and Expedia. An investor might choose this ETF for broad diversification with a focus on companies expected to grow. A key risk is that the ETF’s value can rise or fall with the overall stock market and the analysts’ stock picks may not perform as expected.
How much will it cost me?The expense ratio for the Invesco Raymond James SB-1 Equity ETF (UPGD) is 0.4%, which means you’ll pay $4 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is slightly higher than average because the fund is actively managed, focusing on equities with strong growth potential and solid fundamentals. It reflects the additional costs of expert insights and strategic stock selection.
What would affect this ETF?The UPGD ETF, with its focus on U.S. equities across multiple sectors, could benefit from economic growth and technological advancements, particularly in its top-weighted sectors like Industrials and Technology. However, it may face challenges from rising interest rates, which can impact growth-focused companies, and sector-specific risks such as regulatory changes in Technology or Consumer Cyclical industries. Its broad exposure provides diversification but also makes it sensitive to overall market volatility.

UPGD Top 10 Holdings

UPGD leans heavily into U.S. consumer and industrial names, and that’s where the story starts. Travel plays like Expedia and Airbnb have been rising, giving the fund a nice tailwind as demand stays strong. NetApp adds a steady tech backbone, benefiting from the broader AI and cloud boom. On the softer side, International Paper has been lagging, and Estée Lauder is still trying to shake off past weakness, which keeps a lid on returns. Overall, it’s a North America–centric, consumer-driven portfolio with a sprinkle of tech momentum.
Name
Company Name
Weight %
Market Value
Market Cap
Yearly Gain
Overall Rating
NetApp2.98%$3.57M$36.70B65.81%
76
Outperform
Expedia2.87%$3.44M$39.54B53.37%
80
Outperform
Airbnb2.65%$3.17M$113.43B45.12%
71
Outperform
The Estée Lauder Companies2.50%$3.00M$37.41B12.71%
56
Neutral
Williams-Sonoma2.47%$2.96M$27.68B24.92%
75
Outperform
Mettler-Toledo2.44%$2.93M$28.02B7.50%
64
Neutral
Incyte2.42%$2.91M$25.21B46.99%
81
Outperform
International Paper Co2.41%$2.89M$20.82B-20.87%
49
Neutral
Cognizant2.36%$2.83M$28.85B-11.36%
79
Outperform
Allegion2.31%$2.77M$13.39B-7.26%
72
Outperform

UPGD Technical Analysis

Technical Analysis Sentiment
Neutral
Last Price
Price Trends
50DMA
82.84
Negative
100DMA
80.71
Positive
200DMA
78.04
Positive
Market Momentum
MACD
0.04
Positive
RSI
39.89
Neutral
STOCH
0.62
Positive
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For UPGD, the sentiment is Neutral. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 83.76, equal to the 50-day MA of 82.84, and equal to the 200-day MA of 78.04, indicating a neutral trend. The MACD of 0.04 indicates Positive momentum. The RSI at 39.89 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 0.62 is Positive, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Neutral sentiment for UPGD.

UPGD Peer Comparison

Comparison Results
Name
Price
Price Target
AUM
Expense Ratio
Overall Rating
$120.14M0.40%
70
Neutral
$981.20M0.18%
71
Outperform
$950.48M0.50%
76
Outperform
$922.90M0.27%
71
Outperform
$909.95M0.15%
73
Outperform
$814.11M0.45%
74
Outperform
Performance Comparison
Ticker
Company Name
Price
Change
% Change
UPGD
Invesco Raymond James Sb-1 Equity Etf
81.93
9.51
13.13%
VFMF
Vanguard U.S. Multifactor ETF
HLAL
Wahed FTSE USA Shariah ETF
AUSF
Global X Adaptive U.S. Factor ETF
FDMO
Fidelity Momentum Factor ETF
BGDV
Bahl & Gaynor Dividend ETF
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
DisclaimerThis AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents
Advertisement