tiprankstipranks
Advertisement

SPHQ - ETF AI Analysis

Compare

Top Page

SPHQ

Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF (SPHQ)

Rating:74Outperform
Price Target:
SPHQ, the Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF, earns a solid overall rating thanks to major positions in high-quality companies like Apple, Lam Research, and Cisco, which combine strong financial performance with generally bullish outlooks and strategic focus on growth areas such as AI and services. The fund’s rating is held back somewhat by holdings like GE Vernova and Procter & Gamble, where valuation and cash flow or market-share challenges introduce caution, and by several stocks showing bearish technical trends. A key risk factor is the fund’s reliance on a concentrated group of large, often richly valued U.S. companies, which could be more sensitive to market downturns or shifts in sentiment toward high-valuation stocks.
Positive Factors
Strong Overall Year-to-Date Performance
The ETF has delivered strong gains so far this year, showing that its quality-focused strategy has worked well in the current market.
Leading Quality Companies in Top Holdings
Several major positions like Apple, Lam Research, GE Vernova, Cisco, and Costco have shown strong or steady performance, helping support the fund’s returns.
Low Expense Ratio
The fund’s relatively low annual fee means more of the investment gains stay in investors’ pockets over time.
Negative Factors
High Concentration in a Few Stocks
A small number of companies make up a large share of the portfolio, which increases the impact if any of these holdings run into trouble.
Mixed Performance Among Top Holdings
Some key positions, such as Mastercard and Netflix, have shown weak or negative performance this year, which can drag on the ETF’s results.
Heavy U.S. and Technology Exposure
The fund is almost entirely invested in U.S. stocks and has a large tilt toward the technology sector, making it more sensitive to downturns in the U.S. market or tech industry.

SPHQ vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)

SPHQ Summary

SPHQ is an ETF that follows the S&P 500 Quality index, focusing on strong, established U.S. companies with solid finances and steady earnings. It mainly holds large, well-known businesses such as Apple and Visa, along with firms in technology, industrials, and financials. Investors might consider SPHQ if they want stock market growth while tilting toward higher-quality companies instead of owning the whole market. However, it still invests in stocks, especially many tech-related names, so its price can go up and down with the overall market and may be volatile at times.
How much will it cost me?The Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF (SPHQ) has an expense ratio of 0.15%, meaning you’ll pay $1.50 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is lower than the average for actively managed funds because SPHQ is passively managed, tracking the S&P 500 Quality Index to keep costs down.
What would affect this ETF?The SPHQ ETF, with its focus on high-quality large-cap U.S. stocks, could benefit from continued strength in the technology sector, which is its largest exposure, as well as stable consumer demand for defensive products from companies like Procter & Gamble and Coca-Cola. However, rising interest rates or economic slowdowns could negatively impact industrial and financial sectors, which also make up significant portions of the fund's holdings. Regulatory changes or geopolitical tensions affecting major companies like Apple and Visa could further influence the ETF's performance.

SPHQ Top 10 Holdings

SPHQ leans heavily into U.S. large-cap quality, with Big Tech and chip-related names setting the tone. Lam Research and Western Digital have been the fund’s turbochargers, riding strong momentum tied to AI and data demand, while Cisco has been a steady engine in the background. Apple is still rising, but not quite as explosively as the semiconductor plays. On the flip side, Netflix has been losing steam and weighing on returns, and Costco’s more cautious trading has kept it from adding much spark. Overall, the ETF is concentrated in U.S. technology and financial strength.
Name
Company Name
Weight %
Market Value
Market Cap
Yearly Gain
Overall Rating
Mastercard5.60%$1.10B$493.41B-1.82%
75
Outperform
Visa5.44%$1.07B$676.80B7.57%
70
Outperform
Apple5.15%$1.01B$4.57T35.69%
79
Outperform
Lam Research4.11%$809.56M$389.37B200.39%
77
Outperform
GE Vernova Inc.4.09%$806.50M$263.76B52.26%
69
Neutral
GE Aerospace3.98%$785.32M$383.98B33.25%
72
Outperform
Costco3.96%$779.89M$420.34B-3.64%
72
Outperform
Netflix3.91%$770.46M$308.71B-37.38%
73
Outperform
Cisco Systems3.90%$769.39M$478.61B73.44%
77
Outperform
Procter & Gamble2.85%$562.71M$338.88B-5.51%
69
Neutral

SPHQ Technical Analysis

Technical Analysis Sentiment
Positive
Last Price
Price Trends
50DMA
86.47
Negative
100DMA
83.14
Positive
200DMA
79.50
Positive
Market Momentum
MACD
-0.07
Negative
RSI
50.84
Neutral
STOCH
58.22
Neutral
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For SPHQ, the sentiment is Positive. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 85.34, equal to the 50-day MA of 86.47, and equal to the 200-day MA of 79.50, indicating a neutral trend. The MACD of -0.07 indicates Negative momentum. The RSI at 50.84 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 58.22 is Neutral, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Positive sentiment for SPHQ.

SPHQ Peer Comparison

Comparison Results
Name
Price
Price Target
AUM
Expense Ratio
Overall Rating
$19.74B0.15%
74
Outperform
$1.03T0.03%
74
Outperform
$903.58B0.03%
74
Outperform
$803.31B0.09%
74
Outperform
$490.91B0.18%
73
Outperform
$168.22B0.02%
74
Outperform
Performance Comparison
Ticker
Company Name
Price
Change
% Change
SPHQ
Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF
86.50
14.42
20.01%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
IVV
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
SPY
SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust
QQQ
Invesco QQQ Trust
SPYM
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
DisclaimerThis AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents
Advertisement