SMOG - ETF AI Analysis
Top Page
VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF (SMOG)
SMOG, the VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF, has a solid but not top-tier overall rating, largely driven by strong holdings like Tesla and First Solar, which show robust financial performance, growth potential, and supportive valuations. Iberdrola, Enel, and NextEra Energy also contribute positively with stable profitability and dividends, though high debt and some bearish or cautious technical signals, along with weaker names like Rivian and Bloom Energy facing leverage and cash flow challenges, hold the fund back. The main risk factor is the fund’s concentration in low-carbon and clean energy companies, which can make performance more sensitive to sector-specific volatility and policy changes.
SMOG vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)
- AUM
- 127.61M
- Region
- Global
- Expense Ratio
- 0.64%
- Beta
- 0.82
- Issuer
- VanEck
- Inception Date
- May 03, 2007
- Dividend Yield
- 1.56%
- Asset Class
- Equity
- Index Tracked
- MVIS Global Low Carbon Energy
SMOG Summary
The VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF (SMOG) tracks the MVIS Global Low Carbon Energy index and focuses on companies helping the world shift to cleaner energy. It holds businesses involved in renewable power, electric vehicles, and energy technology, including well-known names like Tesla and NextEra Energy. Investors might consider SMOG if they want growth potential from the long-term move toward green energy and diversification across many low-carbon companies worldwide. However, because it is concentrated in the clean energy sector, its price can be volatile and may rise or fall sharply as investor sentiment and government policies toward green energy change.
How much will it cost me?
The VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF (SMOG) has an expense ratio of 0.61%, which means you’ll pay $6.10 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is higher than the average for ETFs because it is actively managed and focuses on a specialized sector like low-carbon energy, which requires more research and management.
What would affect this ETF?
The VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF (SMOG) could benefit from global policies and consumer demand shifting towards renewable energy and electric vehicles, as well as advancements in clean energy technologies. However, it may face challenges from fluctuating energy prices, potential regulatory hurdles, or slower-than-expected adoption of green energy solutions in certain regions. Its global exposure and reliance on top holdings like Tesla and NextEra Energy make it sensitive to changes in the performance of these companies and broader market trends.
SMOG Top 10 Holdings
SMOG is leaning heavily into global clean power and electric vehicles, with European utilities like Iberdrola and Enel providing a steadier backbone while U.S. peer NextEra has seen more mixed momentum. On the flashier side, Tesla is clearly dragging the fund, and Rivian isn’t helping much either, as both EV names have been losing steam. BYD offers a brighter spot with more recently rising performance, and Bloom Energy adds a volatile but energetic growth tilt. Overall, the ETF is tightly focused on low‑carbon energy and EVs across the U.S., Europe, and Asia.
| Name | Company Name | Weight % | Market Value | Market Cap | Yearly Gain | Overall Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Iberdrola | 8.79% | $11.22M | EUR 140.00B | 28.41% | 67Neutral | |
| NextEra Energy | 7.00% | $8.93M | $164.50B | -1.13% | 71Outperform | |
| Enel S.p.A. | 6.84% | $8.72M | EUR 91.19B | 8.44% | 67Neutral | |
| Tesla | 8.88% | $11.32M | $1.53T | -14.67% | 73Outperform | |
| BYD Co | 5.05% | $6.44M | HKD 753.13B | -34.50% | 66Neutral | |
| Bloom Energy | 5.61% | $7.16M | $65.58B | 130.76% | 62Neutral | |
| Samsung SDI Co., Ltd | 4.65% | $5.93M | KRW 43.27T | 95.05% | ―― | |
| First Solar | 2.69% | $3.43M | $18.75B | -23.33% | 75Outperform | |
| Rivian Automotive | 2.54% | $3.24M | $18.00B | -6.66% | 61Neutral |
SMOG Technical Analysis
Price Trends
Market Momentum
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For SMOG, the sentiment is Negative. The current price of 130.50 is below the 20-day moving average (MA) of 133.88, below the 50-day MA of 136.72, and below the 200-day MA of 140.94, indicating a bearish trend. The MACD of -1.37 indicates Positive momentum. The RSI at 38.07 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 20.14 is Neutral, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Negative sentiment for SMOG.
SMOG Peer Comparison
Comparison Results
| Name | Price | Price Target | AUM | Expense Ratio | Overall Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| $130.51 | $138.00(5.74% Upside) | $127.61M | 0.64% | 53Neutral | |
| $71.04 | $72.07(1.45% Upside) | $1.21B | 0.47% | 62Neutral | |
| $73.40 | $81.85(11.51% Upside) | $945.36M | 0.40% | 62Neutral | |
| $38.30 | $54.35(41.91% Upside) | $917.04M | 0.75% | 70Outperform | |
| $46.02 | $56.25(22.25% Upside) | $195.68M | 0.12% | 66Neutral | |
| $31.65 | $38.82(22.63% Upside) | $170.57M | 0.19% | 65Neutral |
Performance Comparison
| Show on chart | Ticker | Company Name | Price | Change | % Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SMOG | VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF | 130.50 | -1.93 | -1.45% | |
| IHAK | iShares Cybersecurity & Tech ETF | 71.04 | 18.52 | 35.26% | |
| GII | SPDR S&P Global Infrastructure ETF | 73.40 | 4.65 | 6.77% | |
| IVES | Dan IVES Wedbush AI Revolution ETF | 38.30 | 3.69 | 10.67% | |
| NZAC | SPDR MSCI ACWI Climate Paris Aligned ETF | 46.02 | 3.21 | 7.50% | |
| IQSZ | Invesco Global Equity Net Zero ETF | 31.65 | 4.66 | 17.28% |
This AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.