tiprankstipranks
Advertisement

SCZ - ETF AI Analysis

Compare

Top Page

SCZ

iShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF (SCZ)

Rating:58Neutral
Price Target:
SCZ, the iShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF, has a solid but not outstanding overall rating, reflecting a mix of strong and weaker international small-cap holdings. High-quality names like NGK SPARK PLUG, Games Workshop, IMI, and The Weir Group support the fund with strong financial performance and generally positive momentum, while weaker positions such as Rohm Co and Bluescope Steel, which face financial and technical challenges, drag on the overall score. The main risk is that the fund is concentrated in smaller international companies, where individual stock volatility and sector or regional shocks can have a bigger impact on performance.
Positive Factors
Strong Top Holdings
Many of the largest positions have shown strong gains this year, helping support the ETF’s overall performance.
Broad International Diversification
The fund spreads its investments across many countries outside the U.S., which can reduce the impact of problems in any single market.
Wide Sector Spread
Holdings are spread across multiple sectors such as industrials, consumer companies, materials, financials, and technology, helping to balance sector-specific risks.
Negative Factors
Heavy Japan Exposure
A large share of the portfolio is invested in Japan, so the fund is sensitive to economic and market conditions there.
Small-Cap Volatility
Because the ETF focuses on smaller companies, its share price can be more volatile than funds that hold larger, more established firms.
Moderate Expense Ratio
The fund’s fees are not especially low, which means a noticeable portion of returns goes toward covering the expense ratio each year.

SCZ vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)

SCZ Summary

The iShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF (SCZ) tracks the MSCI EAFE Small Cap Index, which focuses on smaller companies in developed markets outside North America, mainly in places like Japan, the UK, and Australia. It owns many different businesses across industries, including well-known names like Diploma in the UK and Bluescope Steel in Australia. Investors might choose SCZ to add international diversification and tap into the growth potential of smaller, more nimble companies. However, small-cap stocks can be more volatile, so the ETF’s price can move up and down more sharply than funds focused on larger companies.
How much will it cost me?The iShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF (SCZ) has an expense ratio of 0.40%, which means you’ll pay $4 per year for every $1,000 invested. This expense ratio is slightly higher than average because the fund is passively managed but focuses on a niche category of international small-cap stocks, which can require more specialized tracking. Overall, it’s a reasonable cost for the diversification and growth potential it offers.
What would affect this ETF?The SCZ ETF, which focuses on small-cap companies in developed markets outside North America, could benefit from economic growth in regions like Europe and Asia, as smaller companies often thrive during periods of innovation and expansion. However, it may face challenges from rising interest rates, which can increase borrowing costs for small-cap firms, and global economic uncertainty, which could lead to higher volatility in these markets. Sector-specific trends, such as advancements in technology or shifts in industrial demand, could also impact the ETF's performance positively or negatively.

SCZ Top 10 Holdings

SCZ leans into international small caps, with a mix of rising industrial and financial names helping set the tone. UK engineering firms like Diploma and IMI have been climbing steadily, giving the fund a solid industrial backbone, while insurer Beazley adds a steady, cash-rich financial anchor. On the other side, Japanese chip-related players such as Kokusai Electric and Rohm have seen more mixed, recently lagging moves, injecting volatility into returns. With holdings spread across Europe, Japan, and Australia, the ETF is globally diversified but clearly tilted toward developed-market small-cap cyclicals and industrials.
Name
Company Name
Weight %
Market Value
Market Cap
Yearly Gain
Overall Rating
Diploma0.37%$49.40M£9.53B36.24%
66
Neutral
Beazley0.28%$37.10M£7.63B44.27%
76
Outperform
Bluescope Steel 0.28%$37.02MAU$14.06B36.91%
54
Neutral
IMI plc0.27%$35.62M£6.80B32.58%
75
Outperform
Weir Group plc (The)0.26%$35.06M£7.08B1.42%
75
Outperform
Kokusai Electric Corporation0.26%$34.66M¥1.44T88.38%
66
Neutral
Games Workshop0.24%$32.10M£6.56B19.21%
78
Outperform
Accelleron Industries AG0.24%$31.95MCHF6.64B-0.15%
73
Outperform
NGK SPARK PLUG CO0.24%$31.74M¥1.80T65.32%
79
Outperform
0.24%$31.73M

SCZ Technical Analysis

Technical Analysis Sentiment
Positive
Last Price
Price Trends
50DMA
83.31
Positive
100DMA
81.89
Positive
200DMA
79.68
Positive
Market Momentum
MACD
RSI
STOCH
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For SCZ, the sentiment is Positive. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 83.06, equal to the 50-day MA of 83.31, and equal to the 200-day MA of 79.68, indicating a bullish trend. The MACD of ― indicates undefined momentum. The RSI at ― is undefined, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of ― is undefined, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Positive sentiment for SCZ.

SCZ Peer Comparison

Comparison Results
Name
Price
Price Target
AUM
Expense Ratio
Overall Rating
$13.35B0.40%
58
Neutral
$186.57B0.07%
65
Neutral
$76.47B0.32%
66
Neutral
$11.72B0.20%
65
Neutral
$10.96B0.24%
67
Neutral
$10.69B0.28%
67
Neutral
Performance Comparison
Ticker
Company Name
Price
Change
% Change
SCZ
iShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF
83.90
12.71
17.85%
IEFA
iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF
EFA
iShares MSCI EAFE ETF
ESGD
iShares ESG Aware MSCI EAFE ETF
JIRE
JPMorgan International Research Enhanced Equity ETF
FENI
Fidelity Enhanced International ETF
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
DisclaimerThis AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents
Advertisement