SAEF - ETF AI Analysis
Top Page
Schwab Ariel ESG ETF (SAEF)
Rating:67Neutral
Price Target:―
Positive Factors
Solid Recent Performance
The ETF has delivered strong gains so far this year, with especially strong returns in the most recent month.
Strong Top Contributors
Several of the largest holdings, such as Lindblad Expeditions, Sphere Entertainment, and Northern, have shown strong year-to-date performance that supports the fund’s overall results.
Broad Sector Diversification
Holdings spread across consumer, industrial, financial, technology, health care, and other sectors help reduce the impact of weakness in any single industry.
Negative Factors
Higher Expense Ratio
The fund’s expense ratio is on the higher side for an ETF, which can modestly reduce net returns over time.
Concentrated in U.S. Market
With almost all assets in U.S. companies, the ETF offers limited geographic diversification and is heavily tied to the U.S. economy.
Mixed Performance Among Top Holdings
Some key positions, including Brink's Company, Norwegian Cruise Line, and Prestige Consumer Healthcare, have shown weak year-to-date performance, which can drag on the fund if the trend continues.
SAEF vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)
AUM25.15M
RegionNorth America
Expense Ratio0.59%
Beta1.01
IssuerSchwab
Inception DateNov 15, 2021
Dividend Yield0.34%
Asset ClassEquity
Index TrackedNo Underlying Index
Share Statistics
EPS (TTM)N/A
Shares OutstandingN/A
10 Day Avg. Volume1,142
30 Day Avg. Volume1,866
Financial Highlights & Ratios
PEG RatioN/A
Price to Book (P/B)N/A
Price to Sales (P/S)N/A
P/FCF RatioN/A
Enterprise Value/Market CapN/A
Enterprise Value/RevenueN/A
Enterprise Value/Gross ProfitN/A
Enterprise Value/EbitdaN/A
Forecast
1Y Price Target
36.00Price Target Upside― Downside
Rating ConsensusModerate Buy
Number of Analyst Covering58
EPS Forecast (FY)N/A
Revenue Forecast (FY)N/A
SAEF Summary
The Schwab Ariel ESG ETF (SAEF) is a U.S. stock fund that focuses on mid-size and smaller companies chosen for strong environmental, social, and governance (ESG) practices, rather than tracking a traditional index. It spreads investments across many sectors, including consumer, industrial, financial, and tech businesses. Well-known names in the fund include Norwegian Cruise Line and Northern Trust. Someone might invest in SAEF to seek long-term growth while aligning their money with their values and gaining diversification beyond large, famous companies. A key risk is that smaller-company stocks can be more volatile and can go up and down sharply with the market.
How much will it cost me?The Schwab Ariel ESG ETF (SAEF) has an expense ratio of 0.59%, which means you’ll pay $5.90 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is higher than the average for passively managed ETFs because SAEF is actively managed, focusing on ESG principles and niche market opportunities.
What would affect this ETF?The Schwab Ariel ESG ETF (SAEF) could benefit from increasing investor interest in ESG-focused investments and growth in mid-cap and small-cap companies, particularly in sectors like Consumer Cyclical and Technology, which are heavily weighted in this ETF. However, it may face challenges from economic slowdowns, rising interest rates, or regulatory changes that impact ESG standards or the extended market. Additionally, its U.S.-focused exposure means its performance is closely tied to domestic economic conditions.
SAEF Top 10 Holdings
SAEF leans heavily into U.S. mid- and small-cap names, with a clear tilt toward consumer and industrial stories rather than the usual Big Tech crowd. Recent strength from Generac, Keysight, and nVent Electric has been doing much of the heavy lifting, as these industrial and tech players ride solid demand and upbeat outlooks. On the flip side, Norwegian Cruise Line and Brink’s have been lagging, acting like a headwind just as travel and security should be tailwinds. Overall, the fund’s performance is being driven by a concentrated mix of U.S. niche operators rather than mega-cap giants.
Name | Company Name | Weight % | Market Value | Market Cap | Yearly Gain | Overall Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OneSpaWorld Holdings | 5.60% | $1.29M | $2.42B | 24.36% | 70 Outperform | |
| Brink's Company | 3.93% | $903.45K | $4.24B | 24.12% | 74 Outperform | |
| Lindblad Expeditions Holdings | 3.55% | $816.61K | $1.49B | 107.68% | 53 Neutral | |
| Norwegian Cruise Line | 3.40% | $780.48K | $8.32B | -0.82% | 64 Neutral | |
| Jones Lang Lasalle | 3.26% | $749.54K | $13.73B | 31.60% | 79 Outperform | |
| Sphere Entertainment | 3.17% | $729.76K | $5.08B | 274.14% | 66 Neutral | |
| Generac Holdings | 2.84% | $651.82K | $16.75B | 123.67% | 59 Neutral | |
| Keysight Technologies | 2.83% | $650.86K | $59.44B | 115.54% | 77 Outperform | |
| Northern | 2.80% | $643.98K | $31.42B | 58.61% | 78 Outperform | |
| nVent Electric | 2.73% | $626.53K | $28.04B | 161.84% | 76 Outperform |
SAEF Technical Analysis
Positive
―
Price Trends
29.18
Positive
29.03
Positive
28.26
Positive
Market Momentum
0.26
Negative
60.93
Neutral
84.80
Negative
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For SAEF, the sentiment is Positive. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 29.60, equal to the 50-day MA of 29.18, and equal to the 200-day MA of 28.26, indicating a bullish trend. The MACD of 0.26 indicates Negative momentum. The RSI at 60.93 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 84.80 is Negative, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Positive sentiment for SAEF.
SAEF Peer Comparison
Comparison Results
Performance Comparison
SAEF
Schwab Ariel ESG ETF
30.34
6.03
24.80%
OASC
OneAscent Small Cap Core ETF
―
―
―
ASCE
Allspring SMID Core ETF
―
―
―
SMOX
Horizon Small/Mid Cap Core Equity ETF
―
―
―
BCSM
Baron SMID Cap ETF
―
―
―
HSMV
First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Small/Mid ETF
―
―
―
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
DisclaimerThis AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents