tiprankstipranks
Trending News
More News >
Advertisement

RVER - AI Analysis

Compare

Top Page

RVER

Trenchless Fund ETF (RVER)

Rating:66Neutral
Price Target:
$35.00
The Trenchless Fund ETF (RVER) has a solid overall rating, reflecting a mix of strong performers and some weaker holdings. Leading contributors include Alphabet (GOOGL), which benefits from robust financial performance and strategic investments in AI and cloud services, and Eli Lilly (LLY), which shows strong revenue growth and market share gains despite some financial risks. However, weaker holdings like Rocket Companies (RKT), with significant financial challenges and poor valuation metrics, slightly weigh down the fund's rating. Investors should note the ETF's exposure to diverse sectors, which helps mitigate risks but also includes holdings with varying levels of performance.
Positive Factors
Strong Year-to-Date Performance
The ETF has delivered solid gains so far this year, indicating strong overall momentum.
Sector Diversification
The fund is spread across multiple sectors, including Consumer Cyclical, Health Care, and Technology, reducing reliance on any single industry.
Top Holdings with Positive Returns
Several key holdings, such as Alphabet, Rocket Companies, and Oscar Health, have shown strong year-to-date performance, supporting the fund’s growth.
Negative Factors
High Geographic Concentration
Nearly 90% of the fund’s exposure is in U.S. companies, limiting diversification across global markets.
Underperforming Key Holdings
Some major positions, like Novo Nordisk and Mobileye, have lagged this year, potentially dragging down overall performance.
Relatively High Expense Ratio
The ETF’s expense ratio is higher than many low-cost alternatives, which could eat into long-term returns.

RVER vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)

RVER Summary

The Trenchless Fund ETF (Ticker: RVER) is an investment fund that focuses on companies involved in trenchless technology, which uses innovative methods to build and maintain infrastructure without traditional digging. It includes well-known companies like Amazon and Novo Nordisk, along with others in sectors such as healthcare, technology, and consumer goods. Investors might consider RVER for its potential growth in a niche market that supports modern infrastructure development. However, new investors should be aware that this ETF is heavily influenced by the performance of the U.S. market, which makes it vulnerable to economic fluctuations.
How much will it cost me?The Trenchless Fund ETF (Ticker: RVER) has an expense ratio of 0.66%, which means you’ll pay $6.60 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is higher than average because it is actively managed, focusing on a niche sector with specialized expertise to target growth opportunities. While it costs more, the fund aims to deliver value through its unique investment strategy.
What would affect this ETF?The Trenchless Fund ETF (RVER) could benefit from increasing demand for innovative infrastructure solutions, particularly in the U.S., where trenchless technology is gaining traction in utility installations and pipeline rehabilitation. However, its exposure to consumer cyclical and technology sectors may face challenges during economic downturns or periods of high interest rates, which can reduce spending and innovation. Regulatory changes or shifts in government infrastructure priorities could also impact the ETF's performance positively or negatively.

RVER Top 10 Holdings

The Trenchless Fund ETF is leaning heavily on consumer cyclical and healthcare sectors, with Amazon and Novo Nordisk playing pivotal roles in shaping recent performance. Amazon appears to be losing steam, with mixed sentiment around its valuation and AWS challenges, while Novo Nordisk is struggling with headwinds in the U.S. market and declining cash flow. On the brighter side, Eli Lilly is rising steadily, buoyed by strong growth prospects, and LVMH is shining with resilience in margins and cash flow. The fund’s U.S.-centric focus and sector concentration make it a niche play, but mixed results from key holdings may temper enthusiasm.
Name
Company Name
Weight %
Market Value
Market Cap
Yearly Gain
Overall Rating
Amazon10.17%$10.05M$2.60T23.39%
76
Outperform
Eli Lilly & Co9.07%$8.95M$815.73B5.36%
76
Outperform
Novo Nordisk8.47%$8.36M$216.52B-55.82%
71
Outperform
Mobileye Global, Inc. Class A7.71%$7.61M$10.70B-15.54%
59
Neutral
PayPal Holdings5.39%$5.32M$64.81B-10.33%
78
Outperform
LVMH Moet Hennessy Louis Vuitton SE5.33%$5.26M$350.72B7.37%
75
Outperform
Alphabet Class A5.24%$5.18M$3.40T64.16%
80
Outperform
Monday.com5.18%$5.11M$10.42B-31.48%
73
Outperform
Rocket Companies4.65%$4.59M$46.88B8.71%
47
Neutral
Oscar Health4.49%$4.43M$4.65B1.98%
54
Neutral

RVER Technical Analysis

Technical Analysis Sentiment
Positive
Last Price
Price Trends
50DMA
32.98
Positive
100DMA
32.11
Positive
200DMA
30.42
Positive
Market Momentum
MACD
<0.01
Positive
RSI
49.31
Neutral
STOCH
28.81
Neutral
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For RVER, the sentiment is Positive. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 33.24, equal to the 50-day MA of 32.98, and equal to the 200-day MA of 30.42, indicating a neutral trend. The MACD of <0.01 indicates Positive momentum. The RSI at 49.31 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 28.81 is Neutral, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Positive sentiment for RVER.

RVER Peer Comparison

Comparison Results
Name
Price
Price Target
AUM
Expense Ratio
Overall Rating
$98.75M0.66%
66
Neutral
$99.20M0.65%
70
Outperform
$98.47M0.89%
69
Neutral
$94.14M0.29%
74
Outperform
$94.13M0.85%
70
Neutral
$85.73M0.52%
72
Outperform
Performance Comparison
Ticker
Company Name
Price
Change
% Change
RVER
Trenchless Fund ETF
33.01
6.10
22.67%
YALL
God Bless America ETF
BAMD
Brookstone Dividend Stock ETF
LCAP
Principal Capital Appreciation Select ETF
STNC
Stance Equity ESG Large Cap Core ETF
RFDA
RiverFront Dynamic US Dividend Advantage ETF
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.

Disclaimer

This AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents
Advertisement