TipRanks
Advertisement

QEW - ETF AI Analysis

Compare

Top Page

QEW

Invesco QQQ Equal Weight ETF (QEW)

Rating:71Outperform
Price Target:
QEW, the Invesco QQQ Equal Weight ETF, has a solid overall rating that reflects a portfolio of generally strong, growing companies with some valuation and technical risks. High-quality holdings like Regeneron, Amgen, PayPal, and DoorDash support the fund’s rating through strong financial performance, positive earnings outlooks, and strategic growth initiatives, while names like Axon and Palo Alto Networks introduce some caution due to bearish technical signals and high valuations. The main risk factor is that several key holdings show signs of being expensive or facing negative price momentum, which could increase volatility even though the fund is diversified by equally weighting its positions.
Positive Factors
Strong Year-to-Date Performance
The ETF has delivered strong gains so far this year, indicating that its overall mix of stocks has recently worked well for investors.
Equal-Weight Approach Within the Nasdaq-100
By spreading investments more evenly across its holdings, the fund avoids relying too heavily on just a few mega-cap stocks for returns.
Broad Sector Diversification
Holdings spread across technology, consumer, health care, industrials, and other sectors help reduce the impact if any single industry runs into trouble.
Negative Factors
Heavy Tilt Toward Technology
With a large share of assets in technology companies, the fund can be more sensitive to swings in the tech sector.
Recent Short-Term Weakness
The ETF has shown weak performance over the past month and three months, which may signal near-term volatility or a pause in its earlier strength.
High Dependence on U.S. Market
Because almost all of the fund’s assets are invested in U.S. companies, investors get limited diversification benefits from international markets.

QEW vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)

QEW Summary

Invesco QQQ Equal Weight ETF (QEW) tracks the NASDAQ-100 Equally Weighted Index, which means it invests in about 100 of the biggest non-financial companies on the Nasdaq and gives each one a similar size in the fund. It holds many well-known growth names like Airbnb and Palo Alto Networks, along with other tech, consumer, and healthcare companies. Someone might invest in QEW to get broad exposure to innovative U.S. companies while avoiding too much dependence on a few giants. A key risk is that it is still heavily tied to the stock market and tech-related sectors, so its value can rise and fall sharply.
How much will it cost me?This ETF has an expense ratio of 0.25%, which means you’ll pay about $2.50 per year for every $1,000 you invest. That’s a bit higher than the cheapest index ETFs because QEW uses an equal-weight strategy that requires more frequent rebalancing than a simple passive, cap-weighted index fund.
What would affect this ETF?This ETF is heavily tied to U.S. technology and other growth-oriented companies, so advances in innovation, strong corporate earnings, and a stable or falling interest-rate environment could support its future performance, especially if mid-sized tech names do well. On the other hand, higher interest rates, tighter regulations on big tech and data, or a broad slowdown in the U.S. economy could hurt many of its holdings at the same time, and its equal-weight approach may lag if a few mega-cap tech giants strongly outperform the rest of the market.

QEW Top 10 Holdings

QEW’s equal-weight twist means no single giant calls the shots, but a few names still set the tone. Palo Alto Networks has been a standout, giving the fund a strong cybersecurity tailwind, while fast-rising growth stories like Axon and Airbnb add extra spark from tech-enabled services. On the flip side, Workday, Shopify, and Booking Holdings have been lagging, acting like small anchors on an otherwise lively portfolio. Overall, the ETF leans heavily into U.S. technology and digital consumer businesses, with a broad spread rather than a mega-cap takeover.
Name
Company Name
Weight %
Market Value
Market Cap
Yearly Gain
Overall Rating
Palo Alto Networks1.40%$282.11K$307.28B82.35%
73
Outperform
CrowdStrike Holdings1.38%$279.25K$247.14B95.53%
67
Neutral
Workday1.34%$271.50K$45.25B-14.66%
73
Outperform
Regeneron1.32%$266.47K$79.75B31.86%
78
Outperform
Airbnb1.31%$265.67K$100.30B32.25%
71
Outperform
Fortinet1.30%$263.15K$126.03B113.94%
71
Outperform
DoorDash1.29%$261.10K$85.26B-27.42%
76
Outperform
Automatic Data Processing1.29%$260.35K$108.53B-6.43%
70
Outperform
Paychex1.26%$254.45K$41.55B-11.88%
77
Outperform
Dexcom1.24%$250.40K$32.96B14.26%
79
Outperform

QEW Technical Analysis

Technical Analysis Sentiment
Negative
Last Price
Price Trends
50DMA
29.71
Negative
100DMA
29.29
Negative
200DMA
Market Momentum
MACD
-0.24
Positive
RSI
39.51
Neutral
STOCH
16.97
Positive
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For QEW, the sentiment is Negative. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 29.80, equal to the 50-day MA of 29.71, and equal to the 200-day MA of ―, indicating a neutral trend. The MACD of -0.24 indicates Positive momentum. The RSI at 39.51 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 16.97 is Positive, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Negative sentiment for QEW.

QEW Peer Comparison

Comparison Results
Name
Price
Price Target
AUM
Expense Ratio
Overall Rating
$26.02M0.25%
71
Outperform
$1.38B0.35%
71
Outperform
$94.10M0.22%
74
Outperform
$91.42M1.00%
73
Outperform
$86.65M0.60%
71
Outperform
$85.35M0.09%
74
Outperform
Performance Comparison
Ticker
Company Name
Price
Change
% Change
QEW
Invesco QQQ Equal Weight ETF
29.15
4.35
17.54%
QQQE
Direxion NASDAQ-100 Equal Weighted Index Shares
PQUS
Pictet AI Enhanced US Equity ETF
PRMR
PeakShares RMR Prime Equity ETF
ALTL
Pacer Lunt Large Cap Alternator ETF
SPXE
ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Energy ETF
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
DisclaimerThis AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents
Advertisement