tiprankstipranks
Advertisement

PEZ - ETF AI Analysis

Compare

Top Page

PEZ

Invesco DWA Consumer Cyclicals Momentum ETF (PEZ)

Rating:67Neutral
Price Target:
PEZ’s rating suggests it is a solid but not top-tier ETF, driven by strong consumer and travel names that show good financial performance and positive outlooks. Standout holdings like Delta Air Lines and Ross Stores support the fund with robust revenue growth, strong cash flow, and effective operations, while companies such as CVS and Marriott face profitability, leverage, and valuation challenges that weigh on the overall rating. The main risk factor is the fund’s focus on consumer cyclicals, which can be sensitive to economic slowdowns and issues in key regions like the U.S. and China.
Positive Factors
Strong Top Holdings
Several of the largest positions, including Victoria's Secret, Rush Street Interactive, and eBay, have shown strong gains, helping support the ETF’s overall results.
Momentum Tilt in Consumer Areas
The fund focuses on consumer-related stocks that are currently showing positive momentum, which can benefit investors when these trends continue.
Mix of Multiple Sectors
While it leans heavily toward consumer cyclical stocks, the ETF also holds names in communication services, industrials, health care, consumer defensive, and real estate, adding some diversification across industries.
Negative Factors
Recent Weak Performance
The ETF has recently delivered negative returns over the past month, three months, and year-to-date, which may concern investors looking for steady growth.
High Concentration in Consumer Cyclicals
A large share of the portfolio is tied to consumer cyclical companies, making the fund sensitive to changes in consumer spending and economic conditions.
Higher Expense Ratio
The fund’s expense ratio is relatively high for an ETF, which means more of the returns are used to cover fees instead of going to investors.

PEZ vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)

PEZ Summary

PEZ is the Invesco DWA Consumer Cyclicals Momentum ETF, which follows the Dorsey Wright Consumer Cyclicals Tech Leaders index. It focuses mainly on U.S. consumer discretionary companies—businesses that sell non‑essential goods and services that people tend to spend more on when the economy is doing well. Well-known holdings include Amazon and Ford Motor, along with retailers and travel companies. Investors might consider PEZ for growth potential and diversification within consumer-focused stocks that are currently performing strongly. A key risk is that these types of stocks can be very sensitive to the economy, so the ETF’s value can rise and fall sharply with changes in consumer spending.
How much will it cost me?The Invesco DWA Consumer Cyclicals Momentum ETF (PEZ) has an expense ratio of 0.6%, meaning you’ll pay $6 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is higher than average because the fund is actively managed, focusing on a momentum strategy within the Consumer Discretionary sector to select outperforming stocks.
What would affect this ETF?The PEZ ETF, focused on the Consumer Discretionary sector, could benefit from economic growth and rising consumer spending, which often drive demand for cyclical goods and services. However, it may face challenges during economic downturns or periods of high inflation, as consumers tend to cut back on discretionary spending. Additionally, interest rate hikes or regulatory changes affecting top holdings like Amazon or Carvana could impact performance.

PEZ Top 10 Holdings

PEZ is leaning hard into U.S. consumer cyclicals, with names like Victoria’s Secret and Rush Street Interactive acting as the fund’s momentum engines after strong multi-month runs, even if Victoria’s Secret has cooled a bit lately. Amazon, usually a market darling, has been more of a mixed player here, losing some near-term steam. Travel and leisure exposure via Delta, Marriott, and Hilton adds a cyclical twist, with Delta helping more than the hotel duo, which have been steadier. Overall, the fund is a U.S.-focused bet on discretionary spending and travel staying resilient.
Name
Company Name
Weight %
Market Value
Market Cap
Yearly Gain
Overall Rating
Amazon5.58%$1.28M$2.92T34.19%
71
Outperform
Victoria's Secret5.51%$1.27M$7.05B333.41%
71
Outperform
Delta Air Lines3.96%$910.59K$57.50B74.39%
80
Outperform
eBay3.91%$898.18K$50.62B15.37%
70
Outperform
Ross Stores3.78%$870.01K$80.54B78.14%
80
Outperform
CVS Health3.76%$865.09K$133.25B71.47%
64
Neutral
Rush Street Interactive3.66%$842.58K$5.93B42.87%
68
Neutral
Ford Motor3.50%$804.80K$58.54B31.78%
71
Outperform
Hilton Worldwide Holdings3.48%$800.31K$72.13B19.78%
67
Neutral
Cheesecake Factory3.45%$792.65K$5.04B67.58%
66
Neutral

PEZ Technical Analysis

Technical Analysis Sentiment
Positive
Last Price
Price Trends
50DMA
101.26
Positive
100DMA
99.68
Positive
200DMA
100.88
Positive
Market Momentum
MACD
0.56
Negative
RSI
65.56
Neutral
STOCH
94.38
Negative
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For PEZ, the sentiment is Positive. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 101.06, equal to the 50-day MA of 101.26, and equal to the 200-day MA of 100.88, indicating a bullish trend. The MACD of 0.56 indicates Negative momentum. The RSI at 65.56 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 94.38 is Negative, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Positive sentiment for PEZ.

PEZ Peer Comparison

Comparison Results
Name
Price
Price Target
AUM
Expense Ratio
Overall Rating
$22.86M0.60%
67
Neutral
$50.53M0.15%
70
Outperform
$28.00M0.18%
70
Outperform
$23.54M0.29%
66
Neutral
$7.16M0.65%
58
Neutral
$2.99M0.99%
64
Neutral
Performance Comparison
Ticker
Company Name
Price
Change
% Change
PEZ
Invesco DWA Consumer Cyclicals Momentum ETF
105.07
5.95
6.00%
GXPD
Global X PureCap MSCI Consumer Discretionary ETF
IEDI
iShares Evolved US Discretionary Spending ETF
PSCD
Invesco S&P SmallCap Consumer Discretionary ETF
CLIX
ProShares Long Online/Short Stores ETF
BEDZ
AdvisorShares Hotel ETF
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
DisclaimerThis AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents
Advertisement