tiprankstipranks
Advertisement

PBW - ETF AI Analysis

Compare

Top Page

PBW

Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF (PBW)

Rating:54Neutral
Price Target:
PBW’s rating suggests it is a mixed-quality clean energy ETF, balancing a few strong, profitable companies with several more speculative, unprofitable names. Strong contributors like MYR Group and Powell Industries help the fund with solid financial performance, healthy backlogs, and supportive earnings outlooks, while weaker holdings such as Hyliion, Aspen Aerogels, and Ballard Power Systems face ongoing losses, bearish technical signals, and cash flow issues that drag on the overall rating. The main risk is that many holdings share similar financial challenges in the clean energy space, creating sector-specific risk if these companies struggle to reach consistent profitability.
Positive Factors
Strong Recent Fund Performance
The ETF has delivered strong gains so far this year, showing positive momentum in its clean energy focus.
Many Top Holdings Are Performing Well
Several of the largest positions, including companies in semiconductors and clean energy technology, have shown strong year-to-date performance, helping support the fund’s returns.
Broad Sector Diversification Within Clean Energy
Holdings spread across industrials, technology, materials, consumer sectors, and utilities help reduce the impact if one clean energy industry segment struggles.
Negative Factors
High Expense Ratio
The fund’s fee is relatively high for an ETF, which can eat into long-term returns compared with lower-cost alternatives.
Very Heavy U.S. Concentration
With the vast majority of assets in U.S. companies, the ETF offers limited geographic diversification and is highly tied to the U.S. market and policy environment.
Exposure to Volatile and Underperforming Names
While many holdings are doing well, at least one top position is showing weak performance and several are in early-stage or niche clean energy areas that can be more volatile.

PBW vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)

PBW Summary

The Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF (PBW) tracks the WilderHill Clean Energy Index, focusing on companies involved in renewable energy like solar, wind, and energy storage. It mainly holds U.S. stocks across industrial, technology, and materials sectors, including names such as Bloom Energy and Monolithic Power. Someone might invest in PBW to tap into the long-term growth potential of clean energy and to align their portfolio with the global shift toward greener power. A key risk is that clean energy stocks can be very volatile and may rise or fall more than the overall market.
How much will it cost me?The Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF (PBW) has an expense ratio of 0.64%, meaning you’ll pay $6.40 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is higher than average because it is actively managed and focuses on a niche sector like renewable energy, which requires more specialized research and management.
What would affect this ETF?The Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF (PBW) could benefit from increasing global demand for renewable energy, driven by environmental regulations and the shift toward sustainable energy solutions. However, it may face challenges from rising interest rates, which can increase borrowing costs for companies in the clean energy sector, and potential geopolitical or regulatory changes that impact global supply chains for materials like lithium. Its focus on technology and industrial sectors, along with top holdings in energy storage and efficiency companies, positions it well for long-term growth but also exposes it to volatility in these industries.

PBW Top 10 Holdings

PBW is leaning hard into the clean energy story, with a heavy tilt toward industrial and tech names tied to fuel cells, grid gear, and next-gen power systems, mostly in North America but with some global flavor. Hyliion and Bloom Energy have been doing much of the heavy lifting lately, rising on optimism around their technology and growth plans. MYR Group and Powell Industries are steady workhorses, benefiting from grid and infrastructure demand. On the flip side, FuelCell Energy, Navitas Semiconductor, and Ballard Power are losing steam, dragging on returns as investors question their path to consistent profits.
Name
Company Name
Weight %
Market Value
Market Cap
Yearly Gain
Overall Rating
OPAL Fuels2.46%$10.24M$436.89M0.00%
51
Neutral
Darling Ingredients2.01%$8.38M$9.72B76.01%
69
Neutral
BETA Technologies, Inc. Class A1.96%$8.18M$4.07B
Gevo1.96%$8.17M$387.02M4.49%
55
Neutral
Rivian Automotive1.93%$8.05M$24.74B32.48%
61
Neutral
Cadeler A/S Sponsored ADR1.89%$7.86M$2.29B11.96%
73
Outperform
Gentherm1.84%$7.68M$1.14B20.24%
74
Outperform
Rex American1.84%$7.65M$1.52B77.36%
78
Outperform
XPeng, Inc. ADR1.80%$7.48M$13.79B-22.94%
50
Neutral
Itron1.79%$7.47M$3.81B-36.95%
70
Outperform

PBW Technical Analysis

Technical Analysis Sentiment
Negative
Last Price
Price Trends
50DMA
39.61
Negative
100DMA
36.56
Negative
200DMA
34.45
Negative
Market Momentum
MACD
-1.63
Positive
RSI
34.80
Neutral
STOCH
16.12
Positive
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For PBW, the sentiment is Negative. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 36.75, equal to the 50-day MA of 39.61, and equal to the 200-day MA of 34.45, indicating a bearish trend. The MACD of -1.63 indicates Positive momentum. The RSI at 34.80 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 16.12 is Positive, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Negative sentiment for PBW.

PBW Peer Comparison

Comparison Results
Name
Price
Price Target
AUM
Expense Ratio
Overall Rating
$425.04M0.64%
54
Neutral
$931.22M0.40%
61
Neutral
$783.87M0.85%
52
Neutral
$762.09M0.45%
59
Neutral
$725.45M0.65%
69
Neutral
$660.24M0.75%
54
Neutral
Performance Comparison
Ticker
Company Name
Price
Change
% Change
PBW
Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF
33.39
9.73
41.12%
GII
SPDR S&P Global Infrastructure ETF
NUKZ
Range Nuclear Renaissance Index ETF
AGIX
KraneShares Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF
ROBT
First Trust Nasdaq Artificial Intelligence & Robotics ETF
UFO
Procure Space ETF
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
DisclaimerThis AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents
Advertisement