OUSM - ETF AI Analysis
Top Page
OShares U.S. Small-Cap Quality Dividend ETF (OUSM)
OUSM, the OShares U.S. Small-Cap Quality Dividend ETF, earns a solid overall rating, largely driven by strong, high-quality holdings like Badger Meter, Lincoln Electric, A. O. Smith, and The New York Times, which show robust financial performance, good cash flow, and generally positive business outlooks. Some holdings such as Concentra Group and Encompass Health face issues like weaker cash flow, mixed or bearish technical trends, and operational challenges, which slightly weigh on the fund’s rating. The main risk factor is that several holdings have valuation concerns or legal/operational issues, so while the fund is built around quality small-cap dividend payers, investors should be aware that not all positions are equally strong.
OUSM vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)
- AUM
- 828.28M
- Region
- North America
- Expense Ratio
- 0.48%
- Beta
- 0.64
- Issuer
- ALPS
- Inception Date
- Dec 30, 2016
- Dividend Yield
- 1.96%
- Asset Class
- Equity
- Index Tracked
- O'Shares US Small-Cap Quality Dividend Index
OUSM Summary
OUSM is an ETF that follows the O'Shares US Small-Cap Quality Dividend Index, focusing on smaller U.S. companies that pay regular dividends and have solid financials. It spreads your money across many sectors, including industrials, financials, and technology. Well-known names in the fund include Hasbro and The New York Times. Someone might invest in OUSM to diversify beyond large, famous companies while aiming for both growth and steady dividend income. A key risk is that small-cap stocks can be more volatile, so the value of this ETF can go up and down sharply with the market.
How much will it cost me?
OUSM has an expense ratio of 0.48%, which means you’ll pay about $4.80 per year for every $1,000 invested. This cost is higher than the average ETF because OUSM is more actively managed, focusing on a specific group of high-quality, dividend-paying small-cap stocks.
What would affect this ETF?
OUSM could benefit if the U.S. economy stays healthy, supporting small-cap industrial, financial, and technology companies, and if demand for steady dividend income grows as investors look for quality stocks. On the downside, rising interest rates, an economic slowdown that hits small businesses harder, or regulatory changes affecting sectors like health care and financials could pressure its holdings and reduce returns.
OUSM Top 10 Holdings
OUSM leans into U.S. small caps with a tilt toward industrials and tech, and a handful of names are doing the heavy lifting. Concentra Group and Hasbro have been rising, helping power recent gains, while Lincoln Electric adds a steadier, dividend-friendly backbone. On the flip side, Universal Display and Amdocs have been lagging, acting like a bit of sand in the ETF’s gears, and A. O. Smith is more mixed than exciting. Overall, it’s a domestically focused, quality-driven small-cap mix with no single stock dominating the story.
| Name | Company Name | Weight % | Market Value | Market Cap | Yearly Gain | Overall Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 BMI | Badger Meter | 2.35% | $19.28M | $4.50B | -16.13% | 78Outperform |
 CON | Concentra Group Holdings Parent, Inc. | 2.26% | $18.55M | $5.14B | 104.01% | 66Neutral |
 AOS | A. O. Smith Corporation | 2.17% | $17.79M | $8.79B | -2.77% | 77Outperform |
 LECO | Lincoln Electric Holdings | 2.18% | $17.92M | $15.46B | 22.75% | 77Outperform |
 HAS | Hasbro | 2.18% | $17.87M | $16.55B | 55.53% | 56Neutral |
 EHC | Encompass Health | 2.15% | $17.60M | $13.53B | 16.13% | 64Neutral |
 OLED | Universal Display | 2.09% | $17.15M | $4.04B | -38.70% | 66Neutral |
 DOX | Amdocs | 1.99% | $16.37M | $6.84B | -25.79% | 69Neutral |
 CHE | Chemed | 1.99% | $16.36M | $7.06B | 21.10% | 68Neutral |
 NYT | New York Times | 1.94% | $15.91M | $11.28B | 17.63% | 79Outperform |
OUSM Technical Analysis
Price Trends
Market Momentum
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For OUSM, the sentiment is Positive. The current price of 49.25 is above the 20-day moving average (MA) of 47.88, above the 50-day MA of 47.77, and above the 200-day MA of 46.64, indicating a bullish trend. The MACD of 0.46 indicates Negative momentum. The RSI at 62.31 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 79.80 is Neutral, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Positive sentiment for OUSM.
OUSM Peer Comparison
Comparison Results
| Name | Price | Price Target | AUM | Expense Ratio | Overall Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OUSM | $49.25 | $52.00(5.58% Upside) | $828.28M | 0.48% | 72Outperform |
 SFLO | $39.61 | $47.68(20.37% Upside) | $902.37M | 0.49% | 68Neutral |
 BBSC | $86.27 | $108.63(25.91% Upside) | $726.70M | 0.09% | 64Neutral |
 JHSC | $47.71 | $56.27(17.95% Upside) | $703.01M | 0.42% | 67Neutral |
 EES | $66.11 | $79.69(20.54% Upside) | $690.82M | 0.38% | 67Neutral |
 SMDV | $75.15 | $83.16(10.67% Upside) | $676.64M | 0.40% | 69Neutral |
Performance Comparison
| Show on chart | Ticker | Company Name | Price | Change | % Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OUSM | OShares U.S. Small-Cap Quality Dividend ETF | 49.25 | 6.65 | 15.60% | |
| SFLO | VictoryShares Small Cap Free Cash Flow ETF | 39.61 | 11.79 | 42.39% | |
| BBSC | JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF | 86.27 | 13.90 | 19.20% | |
| JHSC | John Hancock Multifactor Small Cap ETF | 47.71 | 7.22 | 17.82% | |
| EES | WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Fund | 66.11 | 12.41 | 23.11% | |
| SMDV | ProShares Russell 2000 Dividend Growers ETF | 75.14 | 11.68 | 18.40% |
This AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.