TipRanks
Go Ultimate55% OFF

Top Page

LFSC

F/M Emerald Life Sciences Innovation ETF (LFSC)

Rating:51Neutral
Price Target:$42.00â–¼(-3.66% Downside)

LFSC’s rating reflects a mix of promising life sciences innovators alongside several high-risk, unprofitable biotech names. Strong holdings like United Therapeutics and Corcept Therapeutics, which show solid financial performance, positive earnings calls, and supportive technical trends, help lift the fund’s quality. However, weaker positions such as Cogent Biosciences and Spyre Therapeutics, which face ongoing losses, bearish momentum, and valuation challenges, weigh on the rating, and the fund’s concentration in early-stage biotech and life sciences companies is a key risk factor.

Positive Factors
Strong Year-to-Date PerformanceThe ETF has delivered solid gains so far this year, showing positive momentum despite recent short-term pullbacks.
Top Holdings with Strong GainsSeveral of the largest positions, including companies like Corcept Therapeutics and Spyre Therapeutics, have posted strong year-to-date gains that support the fund’s overall performance.
Focused Health Care ExposureWith most of the portfolio in health care and life sciences, the ETF gives targeted access to a sector with significant innovation potential.
Negative Factors
High Sector ConcentrationA very large share of assets is invested in health care, which increases the risk if this single sector faces a downturn.
Limited Geographic DiversificationThe fund is almost entirely invested in U.S. companies, offering little protection if the U.S. market or economy weakens.
Above-Average Expense RatioThe ETF’s fee is relatively high compared with many broad market funds, which can modestly reduce net returns over time.

LFSC vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)

AUM
125.43M
Region
North America
Expense Ratio
0.54%
Beta
1.07
Issuer
F/m
Inception Date
Oct 30, 2024
Dividend Yield
N/A
Asset Class
Equity
Index Tracked
No Underlying Index

LFSC Summary

The F/M Emerald Life Sciences Innovation ETF (LFSC) focuses on innovative health care companies, especially in pharmaceuticals, biotechnology, and life sciences. It does not track a traditional index, but instead selects U.S. firms working on new drugs, medical treatments, and diagnostic tools. Well-known names in the fund include Guardant Health and United Therapeutics. Someone might invest in this ETF to seek growth from medical breakthroughs and to add specialized health care exposure to their portfolio. However, it is heavily concentrated in a single, high-risk sector, so its price can swing sharply up or down.

How much will it cost me?

This ETF has an expense ratio of 0.54%, which means you’ll pay about $5.40 per year for every $1,000 invested. That’s higher than the average low-cost index ETF because this fund is actively managed and focuses on a specialized niche in life sciences and biotech.

What would affect this ETF?

LFSC could benefit from ongoing medical breakthroughs, supportive health care policies, and strong demand for innovative treatments among its U.S. pharma and biotech holdings, which may boost growth for companies like Corcept Therapeutics and Guardant Health. On the downside, setbacks in drug trials, tighter regulations, changes in health care reimbursement, or rising interest rates that make riskier growth stocks less attractive could hurt the fund’s performance given its heavy concentration in life sciences and smaller, specialized firms.

LFSC Top 10 Holdings

LFSC is a pure play on U.S. life sciences, with a heavy tilt toward smaller, high‑beta biotech names. United Therapeutics and Corcept Therapeutics are the steadier engines, rising on solid revenue and profitability, helping anchor the fund. Guardant Health and LivaNova add to the upside with improving momentum, while still wrestling with financial and valuation questions. On the flip side, Cogent Biosciences and Travere Therapeutics are lagging, their losses and weak trends acting like sandbags on performance. Overall, this ETF leans into innovative, higher‑risk health care stories rather than defensive blue chips.

LFSC top ten holdings
NameCompany NameWeight %Market ValueMarket CapYearly GainOverall Rating
REPLREPLReplimune Group8.66%$10.86M$1.67B71.80%42Neutral
LIVNLIVNLivaNova6.88%$8.62M$4.35B49.59%63Neutral
COGTCOGTCogent Biosciences6.04%$7.58M$5.38B91.36%37Underperform
TVTXTVTXTravere Therapeutics5.69%$7.14M$4.75B69.95%56Neutral
GHGHGuardant Health5.61%$7.04M$23.99B93.49%61Neutral
BLLNBLLNBillionToOne, Inc. Class A4.99%$6.26M$5.35B4.02%――
CORTCORTCorcept Therapeutics4.76%$5.97M$8.77B12.26%76Outperform
MANEMANEVeradermics, Incorporated4.28%$5.37M$5.84B270.04%――
SYRESYRESpyre Therapeutics4.10%$5.14M$8.91B298.02%43Neutral
UTHRUTHRUnited Therapeutics3.83%$4.80M$25.68B32.01%79Outperform

LFSC Technical Analysis

Technical Analysis SentimentPositive
Last Price43.60

Price Trends

50DMA44.30Negative
100DMA44.71Negative
200DMA40.59Positive

Market Momentum

MACD-0.11Negative
RSI52.44Neutral
STOCH87.49Negative

Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For LFSC, the sentiment is Positive. The current price of 43.60 is above the 20-day moving average (MA) of 42.27, below the 50-day MA of 44.30, and above the 200-day MA of 40.59, indicating a neutral trend. The MACD of -0.11 indicates Negative momentum. The RSI at 52.44 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 87.49 is Negative, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Positive sentiment for LFSC.

LFSC Peer Comparison

Comparison Results

LFSC against its peer funds
NamePricePrice TargetAUMExpense RatioOverall Rating
LFSCLFSC$43.60$42.00(-3.66% Downside)$125.43M0.54%51Neutral
GTOPGTOP$46.82$63.15(34.87% Upside)$707.62M0.65%73Outperform
FEPIFEPI$38.58$54.31(40.77% Upside)$717.23M0.65%71Outperform
IETCIETC$102.17$144.05(41.00% Upside)$671.84M0.18%74Outperform
AIPIAIPI$33.76$46.83(38.72% Upside)$478.04M0.65%73Outperform
PINKPINK$40.62$50.37(24.00% Upside)$335.60M0.51%65Neutral

Performance Comparison

-20%0%20%40%LFSCGTOPFEPIIETCAIPIPINKDec '25Jan '26Feb '26Mar '26Apr '26May '26Jun '26Jul '26Aug '26Sep '26Oct '26
LFSC and its peers over the selected period
Show on chartTickerCompany NamePriceChange% Change
LFSCF/M Emerald Life Sciences Innovation ETF43.6011.3135.02%
GTOPGoldman Sachs Technology Opportunities ETF46.826.8217.06%
FEPIREX FANG & Innovation Equity Premium Income ETF38.580.451.17%
IETCiShares Evolved US Technology ETF102.17-5.31-4.94%
AIPIREX AI Equity Premium Income ETF33.762.217.01%
PINKSimplify Health Care ETF40.627.9924.47%
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
Disclaimer

This AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.